Abstract
Objective
Postdoctoral training is a critical stage of career development, and there has been a national effort to increase the consistency and quality of postdoctoral experiences. However, much of the effort has gone towards improving the process of training with less effort focusing on the content of what should be achieved during postdoctoral training, primarily because of a lack of empirical evidence in this area. One possible predictor of later scientific productivity is the number of peer-reviewed papers published during postdoctoral training. This manuscript reports on efforts to increase postdoctoral productivity.
Method
A single institution made postdoctoral training program changes designed to increase postdoctoral publication productivity. Postdoctoral publication productivity was compared between 114 trainees who matriculated prior to the changes and 20 trainees who matriculated after the changes.
Results
Postdoctoral trainees who matriculated after program changes had higher publication rates than postdoctoral trainees who matriculated prior to program changes [χ 2(df = 15) = 31.4, p = .002]. Four or more postdoctoral publications are associated with the greatest likelihood of sustained posttraining publications; postdocs matriculating after the program changes were more than twice as likely to have four or more publications (55 vs 26 %).
Conclusions
Postdoctoral program changes designed to increase postdoctoral publication rates can be successful. Defining, for each postdoc, a minimal postdoctoral publication rate may be an appropriate component of individualized development plans.
References
National Academcy of Sciences; National Academy of Engineering; Institute of Medicine. Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers: A Guide for Postdoctoral Scholars, Advisers, Institutions, Funding Organizations, and Disciplinary Societies. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2000.
Leshner AI. Standards for postdoc training. Science. 2012;336(6079):276.
Ross RG, Greco-Sanders L, Laudenslager M, Reite M. An institutional post-doctoral research training program: Predictors of publication rate and federal funding success of its graduates. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(3):234–40.
Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(46):16569–72.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armock, NY: IBM Corp: IBM Corp.; 2013.
Harzing AW. Publish or Perish, available from http://www.harzing.com/pop.htm. 4.8.2 ed2007.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by USPHS Grant MH015442. We would also like to give a special thank you to our trainees, our faculty, and the support of the Developmental Psychobiology Research Group.
Disclosures
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, R.G., Greco-Sanders, L. & Laudenslager, M. An Institutional Postdoctoral Research Training Program: Increasing Productivity of Postdoctoral Trainees. Acad Psychiatry 40, 207–212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0281-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-015-0281-5