Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison of Longitudinal and Block Rotations for a Psychiatric Resident Consultation-Liaison Experience

  • In Brief Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Consultation-liaison psychiatry (CLPsych) is a required experience for psychiatry residents. There is considerable variation in the structure of the experience. We sought to compare a longitudinal and block design for a CLPsych residency experience.

Methods

This research was conducted in the context of a naturalist transition from a longitudinal CLPsych rotation design to a block rotation design. We surveyed residents from both models regarding their views of the CLPsych psychiatry experience. We also compared the scores on the Psychiatric Resident in Training Examination (PRITE). Lastly, we surveyed physicians who requested and received psychiatric consultations.

Results

Residents trained in the block CLPsych model reported a better education and clinical care compared longitudinal model. They also had better scores on the CLPsych section of the PRITE exam. Physicians receiving psychiatric consultations reported better overall quality of consults in the block model.

Conclusions

It appears that block CL psychiatry experiences may be better than longitudinal ones. Programs should consider this design in psychiatry residency education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Watts BV, Shiner B, Pomerantz A, Stender P, Weeks WB. Outcomes of a quality improvement project integrating mental health into primary care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16(5):378–81.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leentjens AF, Jr R, Diefenbacher A, Kathol R, Guthrie E. Psychosomatic medicine and consultation-liaison psychiatry: scope of practice, processes, and competencies for psychiatrists working in the field of CL psychiatry or psychosomatics. [corrected] A consensus statement of the European Association of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry and Psychosomatics (EACLPP) and [corrected] the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine (APM). J Psychosom Res. 2011;70(5):486–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gitlin DF, Schindler BA, Stern TA, Epstein SA, Lamdan RM, McCarty TA, et al. Recommended guidelines for consultation-liaison psychiatric training in psychiatry residency programs. A report from the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Task Force on Psychiatric Resident Training in Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry. Psychosomatics. 1996;37(1):3–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Worley LL, Levenson JL, Stern TA, Epstein SA, Rundell JR, Crone CC, et al. Core competencies for fellowship training in psychosomatic medicine: a collaborative effort by the APA Council on Psychosomatic Medicine, the ABPN Psychosomatic Committee, and the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):557–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Heinrich TW, Schwartz AC, Zimbrean PC, Wright MT. The state of the service: a survey of psychiatry resident education in psychosomatic medicine. Psychosomatics. 2013;54(6):560–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schwartz AC, Zimbrean PC, Lolak S, Wright MT, Brooks KB, Ernst CL, Gitlin DF. Recommendations for training psychiatric residents in psychosomatic medicine. Psychsomatics, 2014 Jan

  7. Juul D, Schneidman BS, Sexson SB, Fernandez F, Beresin EV, Ebert MH, et al. Relationship between resident-in-training examination in psychiatry and subsequent certification examination performances. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(5):404–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huey LY. Problems in behavioral health care: leap-frogging the status quo. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2002;29(4–5):403–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Neither author has any conflict of interest. This work was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH, USA

    Bradley V. Watts & Ronald L. Green

  2. VA National Center for Patient Safety White River Junction, Hartford, VT, USA

    Bradley V. Watts

Authors
  1. Bradley V. Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ronald L. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley V. Watts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watts, B.V., Green, R.L. A Comparison of Longitudinal and Block Rotations for a Psychiatric Resident Consultation-Liaison Experience. Acad Psychiatry 39, 196–199 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0242-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0242-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation