Abstract
Objective
The authors sought to evaluate a formal mentorship program for second-year psychiatry residents at the University of Toronto after the program’s first year of implementation.
Methods
Ten mentees and ten faculty mentors were interviewed by fellow second-year residents and an independent researcher, respectively, about their experiences in the program. Interview data were thematically coded and analyzed using a grounded theory approach.
Results
Three major themes were identified. First, participants emphasized the importance of a natural, flexible, and engaging matching process for mentors and mentees. Many experienced the random assignment approach to matching and the mandatory nature of the program as barriers to developing a meaningful relationship with their mentors. Second, participants expressed a preference for geographic proximity between mentor and mentee workplaces and for meetings to take place in informal settings in order to improve the quality and quantity of their interactions. Lastly, participants felt that clear directions and expectations about the program’s goals should be communicated, and that a forum for information sharing among mentors was needed.
Conclusions
Overall, the majority of participants believed that the program facilitated growth and development and provided positive opportunities for both mentors and mentees. While challenges were present in the program, participants provided tangible recommendations to improve the process.
References
Clark RA, Harden SL, Johnson WB. Mentor relationships in clinical psychology doctoral training: results of a national survey. Teach Psychol. 2000;27:262–8. doi:10.1207/S15328023TOP2704_04.
DeFrancisci Lis L, Wood WC, Petkova E, Shatkin J. Mentoring in psychiatric residency programs: a survey of chief residents. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33(4):307–12. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.33.4.307.
Frei E, Stamm M, Buddeberg-Fischer B. Mentoring programs for medical students—a review of the PubMed literature 2000–2008. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(32). doi:10.1186/1472-6920-10-32.
Sambunjak D, Straus SE. Mentoring in academic medicine: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;296(9):1103–15. doi:10.1001/jama.296.9.1103.
Wise, MR, Shapiro H, Bodley J, Pittini R, McKay D, Willan A, Hannah ME. Factors affecting academic promotion in obstetrics and gynaecology in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 26(2), 127–136.
Moss J, Teshima J, Leszcz M. Peer group mentoring of junior faculty. Acad Psychiatry. 2008;32(3):230–5. doi:10.1176/appi.ap.32.3.230.
Scheckler WE, Tuffli G, Schalch D, MacKinney A, Ehrlich E. The Class Mentor Program at the University of Wisconsin Medical School: a unique and valuable asset for students and faculty. WMJ. 2004;103(7):46–50.
Kosoko-Lasaki O, Sonnino RE, Voytko ML. Mentoring for women and underrepresented minority faculty and students: experience at two institutions of higher education. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98(9):1449–59.
Levinson W, Kaufman K, Clark B, Tolle SW. Mentors and role models for women in academic medicine. West J Med. 1991;154(4):423–6.
Tesch BJ, Wood HM, Helwig AL, Nattinger AB. Promotion of women physicians in academic medicine: glass ceiling or sticky floor? J Am Med Assoc. 1995;273(13):1022–5. doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520370064038.
Association of American Medical Colleges Project Implementation Committee, Bickel J, Wara D, Atkinson BF, Cohen LS, Dunn M, et al. Increasing women’s leadership in academic medicine: report of the AAMC Project Implementation Committee. Acad Med. 2002;77(10):1043–61.
The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Canadian medical education statistics 2011. 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.afmc.ca/publications-statistics-e.php.
Barzansky B, Etzel SI. Medical Schools in the United States, 2010–2011. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;306(9):1007–14. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1220.
Allen TD, Lentz E, Day R. Career success outcomes associated with mentoring others: a comparison of mentors and nonmentors. J Career Dev. 2006;32(3):272–85. doi:10.1177/0894845305282942.
Rodenhauser P, Rudisill JR, Dvorak R. Skills for mentors and protégés applicable to psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2000;24(1):14–27.
Ragins BR, Scandura TA. Gender differences in expected outcomes of mentoring relationships. Acad Manag J. 1994;37:957–71. doi:10.2307/256606.
Russell JEA, Adams DM. The changing nature of mentoring in organizations: an introduction to the special issues on mentoring and organizations. J Vocat Behav. 1997;51:1–14. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1997.1602.
Steiner J, Curtis P, Lanphear B, Vu K, Main DS. Assessing the role of influential mentors in the research development of primary care fellows. Acad Med. 2004;79(9):865–72.
Wingard DL, Garman KA, Reznik V. Facilitating faculty success: outcomes and cost benefit of the UCSD National Center of Leadership in Academic Medicine. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S9–S11.
Ogunyemi D, Solnik MJ, Alexander C, Fong A, Azziz R. Promoting residents’ professional development and academic productivity using a structured faculty mentoring program. Teach Learn MedInt J. 2010;22(2):93–6. doi:10.1080/10401331003656413.
Zink BJ, Hammoud MM, Middleton E, Moroney D, Schigelone A. A comprehensive medical student career development program improves medical student satisfaction with career planning. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19(1):55–60.
Zerzan JT, Hess R, Schur E, Phillips RS, Rigotti N. Making the most out of mentors: a guide for mentees. Acad Med. 2009;84(1):140–4.
Bourdieu P. Understanding. Theory Culture Soc. 1996;13:17–37.
Iversen L, Farmer JC, Hannaford PC. Workload pressures in rural general practice: a qualitative investigation. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002;20(3):139–44.
Coar L, Sim J. Interviewing one’s peers: Methodological issues in a study of health professionals. 2006;24(4):251–6. doi:10.1080/02813430601008479.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 158_183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
Rossman G, Rallis S. Learning in the field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.
Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78(3):328–34.
Johnson BW. The intentional mentor: strategies and guidelines for the practice of mentoring. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2002;33(1):88–96.
Cesa IL, Fraser SC. A method for encouraging the development of good mentor-protégé relationships. Teach Psychol. 1989;16:125–8.
Flint JH, Jahangir AA, Browner BD, Mehta S. The value of mentorship in orthopaedic surgery resident education: the residents’ perspective. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009;91(4):1017–22. doi:10.2106/JBJS.H.00934.
Rose GL. Enhancement of mentor selection using the ideal mentor scale. Res High Educ. 2003;44(4):473–94. doi:10.1023/A:1024289000849.
Cahill L, Blanchard SR. GWA Mentoring Handbook. 2001. Retrieved from: http://www.asu.edu/clubs/gwa/.
Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;3(8 Suppl 2):II46–54.
Wenger-Trayner E. Communities of practice: a brief introduction. 2007. Retrieved from: http://www.ewenger.com/theory/.
Council of Canadian Academies. Strengthening Canada’s research capacity: the gender dimension. Ottawa, ON: The Expert Panel on Women in University Research, Council of Canadian Academies; 2012.
Morley L. Hidden transcripts: The micropolitics of gender in Commonwealth universities. Women’s Stud Int Forum. 2006;29:543–51.
van den Brink M, Benschop Y, Jansen W. Transparency in academic recruitment: a problematic tool for gender equality? Organ Stud. 2010;31(11):1459–83.
Joliff L, Leadley J, Coakley E, Sloane RA. Women in U.S. Academic Medicine and Science: Statistics and Benchmarking Report 2011–2012: Association of American Medical Colleges. 2012.
Bickel J. Women in academic psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2004;28(4):285–91.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Nick Gamble for his consultation during the editing process of writing this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank the reviewers for their thoughtful feedback of this manuscript.
Disclosures
On behalf of all authors, the first and corresponding author, Dr. Sophie Soklaridis, states that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Soklaridis, S., López, J., Charach, N. et al. Developing a Mentorship Program for Psychiatry Residents. Acad Psychiatry 39, 10–15 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0163-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0163-2