Abstract
Objective
The primary goal of this project was to create and evaluate the utility, validity, and reliability of an instrument assessing resident performance during child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) training. In three stages, the instrument was developed and evaluated for utility in assessing skills critical to CAP. Items on the Global Assessment Evaluation (GAE) were derived from the six core competencies identified by the American College of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Secondary goals included producing an instrument that could be used by other CAP training programs and describing a process that could be followed by training programs to create their own assessment instruments.
Methods
Faculty members developed a CAP resident performance evaluation instrument. In a three-stage process, faculty utilized the tool to evaluate residents during and after rotations. Statistical findings guided revisions to improve the utility and reliability of the instrument. For the final version of the GAE, intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated to assess inter-rater reliability, and Principal Components Analysis provided further insight into the dimensions of resident assessment.
Results
The final version of the GAE showed overall and construct validity by capturing significant differences among residents and matched faculty members’ overall impressions of resident performance. Intra-class correlation coefficient values for the overall score (0.945) and individual scales showed good reliability. Resident performance was not correlated with rotation site or model of care.
Conclusions
The GAE has proved a valuable instrument in tracking the progress, strengths, and weaknesses in resident performance over the course of training. Data from multiple evaluations over time provide useful information about resident performance in a way that one or few evaluations does not. This finding is consistent with the practice of semiannual reviews and the new Clinical Competency Committees, both of which are required by the ACGME.
References
Swing SR. The ACGME outcome project: retrospective and prospective. Med Teach. 2007;29:648–54.
Baker K. Determining resident clinical performance: getting beyond the noise. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:862–78.
Randall M, Romero-Gonzalez M, Gonzalez G, et al. Competency of psychiatric residents in the treatment of people with severe mental illness before and after a community psychiatry rotation. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35:15–20.
Gathright MM, Thrush C, Jarvis R, et al. Identifying areas for curricular program improvement based on perceptions of skills, competencies, and performance. Acad Psychiatry. 2009;33:37–42.
Young JQ, Lieu S, O’Sullivan P, et al. Development and initial testing of a structured clinical observation tool to assess pharmacotherapy competence. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35:27–34.
Montgomery GPJ, Crockford DN, Hecker K. The coordinators of psychiatric education (COPE) residency in-training exam: a preliminary psychometric assessment. Acad Psychiatry. 2010;34:203–7.
Hung EK, Binder RL, Fordwood SR, et al. A method for evaluating competency in assessment and management of suicide risk. Acad Psychiatry. 2012;36:23–8.
McNiel DE, Hung EK, Cramer RJ, et al. An approach to evaluating competence in assessing and managing violence risk. Psychiatr Serv. 2011;62:90–2.
Carlson DJ, Reisdorff EJ. The Fundamentals of Competency Evaluation. The Association for Hospital Medical Education’s Guide to Graduate Medical Education (Chapter 3) 2003; retrieved from http://www.ahme.org/.
ACGME Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education; http://www.acgme.org.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2007). ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in child and adolescent psychiatry; retrieved December 2, 2013 from http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/405pr07012007.pdf.
American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (2005). American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Core Competencies Outline from http://www.abpn.com/downloads/core_comp_outlines/ 2011_core_CAP_MREE.pdf.
The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (2013). The Psychiatry Milestone project; retrieved December 2, 2013 from https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/PsychiatryMilestones.pdf.
Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–8. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
Jolliffe IT. Principal component analysis. Springer-Verlag 1986; 487; doi:10.1007/b98835; ISBN 978-0-387-95442-4.
Lurie SJ, Mooney CJ, Lyness JM. Measurement of the general competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2009;84:301–9.
Williams RG, Verhulst S, Colliver JA, et al. Assuring the reliability of resident performance appraisals: more items or more observations? Surgery. 2005;137:141–7.
Dalack GW, Jibson MD. Clinical skills verification, formative feedback, and psychiatry residency trainees. Acad Psychiatry. 2012;36:122–5.
Disclosures
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendixes
Appendixes
Appendix 1
Example of GAE Item with Behavioral Descriptors and Levels
Item 11: Psychotherapy Primary core competency: Medical knowledge Secondary competencies: Patient care, Practice-based learning and improvement, Interpersonal and communication skills | |
1 | Does not understand and does not implement psychotherapeutic principles |
2 | Discusses and is able to implement some practical principles of limited psychotherapy models. Despite knowledge, fails to follow child’s lead, appears uncomfortable during the session, or uses some language/techniques not appropriate for patient’s age or presentation. |
3 | Discusses and is able to implement several models of psychotherapy and practical approaches as applied to children and families. Generally follows child’s lead, uses language/techniques appropriate for patient’s age and presentation, appears comfortable with the child, and appears comfortable with the chosen model of therapy. |
4 | Discusses cases fluently according to many models of psychotherapy as applied to children and families. Implements psychotherapeutic interventions flexibly, based on needs of child and family. Consistently follows child’s lead, uses language/techniques appropriate for patient’s age and presentation, follows the process of the session, asks relevant questions, and is comfortable with the child’s expressed affect. |
5 | Knows classic and modern theories and approaches to psychotherapy. Has in-depth, detailed knowledge of theory, principles, and practice guidelines for psychotherapies. Is highly proficient in implementing appropriate psychotherapeutic interventions. N/A |
Appendix 2
Outline of Items Included in Principal Components Analysis
Patient care
-
1.
Gathers accurate and essential information
-
2.
Gathers information from collateral sources
-
3.
Mental Status Examination
-
4.
Formulation
-
5.
Diagnoses
-
6.
Treatment plan
-
7.
Rapport and therapeutic alliance
-
8.
Evolution of treatment
Medical knowledge
-
9.
Overall medical knowledge
-
10.
Evidence-based medicine
-
11.
Psychotherapy
-
12.
Psychopharmacology
Practice-based learning and improvement
-
13.
Practice-based learning and improvement
Interpersonal and communication skills
-
14.
Supervision
-
15.
Communication with patients, families, and/or translators
-
16.
Communication and interaction with coworkers
-
17.
Communication through Medical Record
Professionalism and ethical behavior
-
18.
Professionalism
-
19.
Ethical decision-making and cultural sensitivity
Systems-based practice
-
20.
Systems-based practice
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomisato, S., Venter, J., Weller, J. et al. Evaluating the Utility, Reliability, and Validity of a Resident Performance Evaluation Instrument. Acad Psychiatry 38, 458–463 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0134-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-014-0134-7