**Adamson, D., Dyke, G., Jang, H., & Rosé, C. P. (2014). Towards an agile approach to adapting dynamic collaboration support to student needs. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 92–124.
Article
Google Scholar
**Ainsworth, S. & Grimshaw, S. (2004). Evaluating the REDEEM authoring tool: can teachers create effective learning environments? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3), 279–312.
Google Scholar
~Arroyo, I., Woolf, B. P., Burelson, W., Muldner, K., Rai, D., & Tai, M. (2014). A multimedia Adaptive tutoring system for mathematics that addresses cognition, metacognition and affect. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 387–426.
Article
Google Scholar
**Baker, M. (1994). A model for negotiation in teaching-learning dialogues. Journal of artificial intelligence in education.
Google Scholar
Baker, R.S.J.d., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Evenson, S.E., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D.J., Beck, J. (2006) Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 392–401.
Baker, R.S.J.d., de Carvalho, A.M.J.A., Raspat, J., Aleven, V., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R. (2009) Educational Software Features that Encourage and Discourage "Gaming the System". Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 475–482.
**Bertels, K. (1994). A dynamic view on cognitive student modeling in computer programming. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
**Blandford, A. E. (1994). Teaching through collaborative problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
**Bos, E., & Van De Plassche, J. (1994). A knowledge-based, English verb-form tutor. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
~Britt, M. A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Larson, A. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (2004). Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students' essays. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3), 359–374.
Google Scholar
**Burns, L. M., Perkins, S. C., & Orth, D. (1994). A neural network approach to automatic recognition of children's handwriting. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(3), 349–369.
Google Scholar
Cen, H., Koedinger, K. R., & Junker, B. (2007). Is Over Practice Necessary?-improving learning efficiency with the cognitive tutor through Educational Data Mining. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 158, 511.
Google Scholar
**Chambreuil, A., Chambreuil, M., & Cherkaoui, C. (1994). Individualization within a multi-agent computer-assisted learning-to-read environment. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
**Chandler, T. N. (1994). The Science Education advisor: applying a User Centered Design approach to the development of an interactive case-based advising system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(3), 283–318.
Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243.
Article
Google Scholar
Christensen, G., Steinmetz, A., Alcorn, B., Bennett, A., Woods, D., & Emanuel, E. J. (2013). The MOOC phenomenon: who takes massive open online courses and why? Available at SSRN, 2350964.
Collins, A. & Halverson, R. (2010). The second educational revolution: rethinking education in the age of technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 18–27.
Article
Google Scholar
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012). Common core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects.
**Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A. (2004). SIETTE: A web-based tool for adaptive testing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(1), 29–61.
Google Scholar
**Devedzic, V. (2004). Education and the semantic web. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(2), 165–191.
Google Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (2013). Design for classroom orchestration. Computers & Education, 69, 485–492.
Article
Google Scholar
~Dzikovska, M., Steinhauser, N., Farrow, E., Moore, J., & Campbell, G. (2014). BEETLE II: deep natural language understanding and automatic feedback generation for Intelligent tutoring in Basic Electricity and Electronics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 284–332.
Article
Google Scholar
**Gegg-Harrison, T. S. (1994). Exploiting program schemata in an automated program debugger. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
Gilbert, J. (2013). Catching the knowledge wave? the knowledge society and the future of education. Journal Article, 2013(1).
**Gulz, A. (2004). Benefits of virtual characters in computer based learning environments: claims and evidence. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3), 313–334.
Google Scholar
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Article
Google Scholar
**Hamburger, H. (1994). Foreign language immersion: Science, practice, and a system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in education.
Google Scholar
**Harrington, M. (1994). CompLex: A tool for the development of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
~Heffernan, N. T. & Heffernan, C. L. (2014). The ASSISTments ecosystem: building a platform that brings scientists and teachers together for minimally invasive research on human learning and teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 470–497.
MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Golan Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to kirschner, sweller, and clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.
Article
Google Scholar
**Hoppe, H. U. (1994). Deductive error diagnosis and inductive error generalization for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(1), 27–49.
Google Scholar
**Ikeda, M. & Mizoguchi, R. (1994). FITS: A framework for ITS–A computational model of tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5(3), 319–348.
Google Scholar
Kardan, S., Roll, I., & Conati, C. (2014). The usefulness of log based clustering in a complex simulation environment. In S. Trausan-Matu et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 168–177). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Katz, I. R. (2013). Testing information literacy in digital environments: ETS's iSkills assessment. Information Technology and Libraries, 26(3), 3–12.
Article
Google Scholar
**Khachatryan, G. A., Romashov, A. V., Khachatryan, A. R., Gaudino, S. J., Khachatryan, J. M., Guarian, K. R., et al. (2014). Reasoning mind Genie 2: An Intelligent tutoring system as a vehicle for international transfer of instructional methods in mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 333–382.
Article
Google Scholar
King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30–35.
Article
Google Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Article
Google Scholar
Koedinger, K. R. & Corbett, A. T. (2006). Cognitive tutors: technology bringing learning science to the classroom. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 61–78). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
**Kono, Y., Ikeda, M., & Mizoguchi, R. (1994). Themis: a nonmonotonic inductive student modeling system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5, 371–371.
Google Scholar
Lee, V. R., Ye, L., & Recker, M. (2012). What a long strange trip it’s been: A comparison of authors, abstracts, and references in the 1991 and 2010 ICLS proceedings. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. J. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012) (vol. 2, pp. 172–176). Sydney, NSW, Australia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Google Scholar
Leelawong, K. & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: the Betty’s brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18(3), 181–208.
Google Scholar
**Lelouche, R. (1994). Dealing with pragmatic and implicit information in an ICALL system: the PILÉFACE example. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
**Lenat, D. B. & Durlach, P. J. (2014). Reinforcing math knowledge by immersing students in a simulated learning-by-teaching experience. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 216–250.
Article
Google Scholar
Lesgold, A. (1988). SHERLOCK: A coached practice environment for an electronics troubleshooting job.
Google Scholar
**Lessard, G., Maher, D., Tomek, I. V., & Levison, M. (1994). Modelling second language learner creativity. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
Lomas, D., Kumar, A., Patel, K., Ching, D., Lakshmanan, M., Kam, M., & Forlizzi, J. L. (2013, April). The power of play: Design lessons for increasing the lifespan of outdated computers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2735–2744). ACM.
Martin, T., Berland, M., Benton, T., & Smith, C. P. (2013). Learning programming with IPRO: the effects of a mobile, social programming environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 24(3), 301–328.
Google Scholar
**Matthews, C. (1994). Intelligent Computer assisted language learning as cognitive science: the choice of syntactic frameworks for language tutoring. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
**McGraw, K. L. (1994). Performance support systems: integrating AI, hypermedia, and CBT to enhance user performance. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
~Murray, R. C., Vanlehn, K., & Mostow, J. (2004). Looking ahead to select tutorial actions: A decision-theoretic approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3), 235–278.
Google Scholar
NGSS (2013). Lead states: next generation Science standards: for states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Nye, B. D. (2015). Intelligent tutoring systems by and for the developing world: a review of trends and approaches for educational technology in a global context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–27.
~Nye, B. D., Graesser, A. C., & Hu, X. (2014). AutoTutor and family: A review of 17 years of natural language tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(4), 427–469.
Article
Google Scholar
Ogan, A., Walker, E., Baker, R., Rodrigo, M. M. T., Soriano, J. C., & Castro, M. J. (2015). Towards understanding how to assess help-seeking behavior across cultures. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 25(2), 229–248. doi:10.1007/s40593-014-0034-8.
Article
Google Scholar
Pappano, L. (2012). The year of the MOOC. The New York Times, 2(12), 2012.
Google Scholar
**Pareto, L. (2014). A teachable agent Game Engaging Primary School children to learn arithmetic concepts and reasoning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(3), 251–283.
Article
Google Scholar
**Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., Rummel, N., & Pardos, Z. (2014). How Should Intelligent Tutoring Systems sequence multiple graphical representations of fractions? A multi-methods study. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(2), 125–161.
Article
Google Scholar
**Reye, J. (2004). Student modelling based on belief networks. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(1), 63–96.
Google Scholar
**Robertson, J., Cross, B., Macleod, H., & Wiemer-Hastings, P. (2004). Children's interactions with animated agents in an intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3), 335–357.
Google Scholar
Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Improving students’ help-seeking skills using metacognitive feedback in an intelligent tutoring system. Learning and Instruction, 21, 267–280.
Article
Google Scholar
Roll, I., Baker, R. S. J.d., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014a). On the benefits of seeking (and avoiding) help in online problem solving environment. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23(4), 537–560. doi:10.1080/10508406.2014.883977.
Roll, I., Wiese, E., Long, Y., Aleven, V., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014b). Tutoring self- and co-regulation with intelligent tutoring systems to help students acquire better learning skills. In R. Sottilare, A. Graesser, X. Hu, & B. Goldberg (Eds.), Design recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems: volume 2 - Adaptive instructional strategies (pp. 169–182). Orlando, FL: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
Google Scholar
**Rosatelli, M. C. & Self, J. A. (2004). A collaborative case study system for distance learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(1), 97–125.
Google Scholar
**San Pedro, M. O. Z., d Baker, R. S., & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2014). Carelessness and affect in an Intelligent tutoring system for mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(2), 189–210.
Article
Google Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2011). Stealth assessment in computer-based games to support learning. Computer Games and Instruction, 55(2), 503–524.
Google Scholar
**Suraweera, P. & Mitrovic, A. (2004). An intelligent tutoring system for entity relationship modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(3), 375–417.
Google Scholar
**Tegos, S., Demetriadis, S., & Tsiatsos, T. (2014). A configurable conversational agent to trigger students’ productive dialogue: A pilot study in the CALL domain. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 62–91.
Article
Google Scholar
Tobias, S. & Duffy, T. M. (2009). Constructivist instruction: success or failure? (p. 392). New York: Taylor & Francis. Retrieved from Google Books.
Google Scholar
Toner, P. (2011), “Workforce Skills and Innovation: An Overview of Major Themes in the Literature”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 55, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kgk6hpnhxzq-en
Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. John Wiley & Sons.
**Uresti, J. A. R. & Boulay, B. D. (2004). Expertise, motivation and teaching in learning companion systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(2), 193–231.
Google Scholar
**Van Joolingen, W. R. (1995). QMaPS: qualitative reasoning for simulation learning environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Google Scholar
VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227–265.
Google Scholar
VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221.
Article
Google Scholar
**Vanlehn, K., Ohlsson, S., & Nason, R. (1994). Applications of simulated students: An exploration. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 5, 135–135.
Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). Thought and language. MIT press.
**Walker, A., Recker, M. M., Lawless, K., & Wiley, D. (2004). Collaborative information filtering: A review and an educational application. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(1), 3–28.
Google Scholar
**Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2014). Adaptive intelligent support to improve peer tutoring in algebra. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 33–61.
Article
Google Scholar
~Weragama, D. & Reye, J. (2014). Analysing student programs in the PHP Intelligent tutoring system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(2), 162–188.
Article
Google Scholar
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). nStudy: Tracing and supporting self-regulated learning in the Internet. In International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 293–308). Springer New York.
**Yoo, J. & Kim, J. (2014). Can online discussion participation predict group project performance? investigating the roles of linguistic features and participation patterns. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 24(1), 8–32.
Article
Google Scholar
**Zapata-Rivera, J. D. & Greer, J. E. (2004). Interacting with inspectable bayesian student models. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14(2), 127–163.
Google Scholar