Adams, E. (2010). Fundamentals of game design
(2nd ed.). Berkeley: New Riders Pub.Google Scholar
Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind—creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7
(1), 84–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72
(5), 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9
(4), 403–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21
(4), 755–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, G., Schwartz, D., & Bransford, J. (2001). Technology support for complex problem solving: From SAD environments to AI. In K. D. Forbus & P. J. Feltovich (Eds.), Smart machines in education
(pp. 71–98). Menlo Park: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Belynne, K., & Adebiyi, B. (2005). Case studies in learning by teaching behavioral differences in directed versus guided learning. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 828–833). Stresa, Italy.
Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., & Vye, N. (2005b). Learning by teaching: a new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19
(3–4), 363–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, G., Jeong, H., Kinnebrew, J., Sulcer, B., & Roscoe, R. (2010). Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 5
(2), 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24
(1), 61–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: exploring ideas in high technology
(pp. 115–141). Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn
. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Brophy, S., Biswas, G., Katzlberger, T., Bransford, J., & Schwartz, D. (1999). Teachable agents: Combining insights from learning theory and computer science. In S. P. Lajoie & M. Vivet (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education
(pp. 21–28). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Chan, T. W., & Chou, C. Y. (1997). Exploring the design of computer supports for reciprocal tutoring. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 8
, 1–29.Google Scholar
Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18
(4), 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarebout, G., & Elen, J. (2008). Advice on tool use in open learning environments. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 17
(1), 81–97.Google Scholar
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28
(2), 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, P., Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: a meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19
(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches
(pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Goos, M. (1994). Metacognitive decision making and social interactions during paired problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 6
, 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnebrew, J. & Biswas, G. (2012). Identifying learning behaviors by contextualizing differential sequence mining with action features and performance evolution. In: K. Yacef, O. Zaîane, H. Hershkovitz, M. Yudelson, & J. Stamper (Eds.) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 57–64). International Educational Data Mining Society.
Kinnebrew, J., Loretz, K., & Biswas, G. (2013). A contextualized, differential sequence mining method to derive students’ learning behavior patterns. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5
(1), 190–219.Google Scholar
Kinnebrew, J. S., Segedy, J. R., & Biswas, G. (2014). Analyzing the temporal evolution of students’ behavior in open-ended learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 9
(2), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, S. (2000). Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48
(3), 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, S., Hannafin, M., & Oliver, K. (2012). Student-centered learning environments: Foundations, assumptions and design. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments
(pp. 3–25). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation
. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leelawong, K., & Biswas, G. (2008). Designing learning by teaching agents: The Betty’s Brain system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 18
(3), 181–208.Google Scholar
Michie, D., Paterson, A., & Hayes-Michie, J. (1989). Learning by Teaching. In: 2nd Scandinavian Conference on Artificial Intelligence 89 (pp. 307–331). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Obayashi, F., Shimoda, H., & Yoshikawa, H. (2000). Construction and evaluation of CAI system based on learning by teaching to virtual student. World Multiconference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (pp. 94–99). Volume 3. Orlando, Florida.
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49
, 345–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1
, 117–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. The Elementary School Journal, 93
(5), 643–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palthepu, S., Greer, J., & McCalla, G. (1991). Learning by teaching. In The Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (pp. 357–363). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77
(4), 534–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1989). Conceptions of teaching and approaches to core problems. In M. C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the beginning teacher
(pp. 37–46). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, D. L., Blair, K. P., Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., & Davis, J. (2007). Animations of thought: Interactivity in the teachable agent paradigm. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research and implications for design
(pp. 114–140). UK: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Segedy, J. R. (2014). Adaptive scaffolds in open-ended computer-based learning environments (Doctoral dissertation)
. Nashville: Department of EECS, Vanderbilt University.Google Scholar
Segedy, J.R., Kinnebrew, J., & Biswas, G. (2012a). Relating student performance to action out-comes and context in a choice-rich learning environment. In: S. Cerri, W. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & L. Panourgia (Eds.), Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Vol. 7315. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 505–510). Springer.
Segedy, J.R., Kinnebrew, J., and Biswas, G. (2012b). Supporting student learning using conversational agents in a teachable agent environment. In J. van Aalst, K. Thompson, M. Jacobson, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The future of learning: Proceedings of the 10th international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2012): Vol. 2. Short Papers, Symposia, and Abstracts (pp. 251–255). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Segedy, J.R., Biswas, G., Blackstock, E., & Jenkins, A. (2013a). Guided skill practice as an adaptive scaffolding strategy in open-ended learning environments. In: H.C. Lane, K. Yacef, J. Mostow, & P. Pavlik, (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Vol. 7926. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 532–541). Springer.
Segedy, J. R., Kinnebrew, J., & Biswas, G. (2013b). The effect of contextualized conversational feedback in a complex open-ended learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61
(1), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segedy, J. R., Biswas, G., & Sulcer, B. (2014). A model-based behavior analysis approach for open-ended environments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17
(1), 272–282.Google Scholar
Segedy, J.R., Kinnebrew, J.S., & Biswas, G. (2015). Using coherence analysis to characterize self-regulated learning behaviours in open-ended learning environments. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), in press.
Tan, J., & Biswas, G. (2006). The role of feedback in preparation for future learning: A case study in learning by teaching environments. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Vol. 4053. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 370–381). Springer.
Tan, J., Biswas, G., & Schwartz, D. (2006). Feedback for metacognitive support in learning by teaching environments. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 828–833). Vancouver, Canada.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes
. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wagster, J., Tan, J., Biswas, G., & Schwartz, D. (2007). Do learning by teaching environments with metacognitive support help students develop better learning behaviors? In: D. McNamara & J. Trafton (Eds.) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 695–700). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Wagster, J., Kwong, H., Segedy, J., Biswas, G., & Schwartz, D. (2008). Bringing CBLEs into classrooms: Experiences with the Betty's Brain system. In Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp. 252–256). Santander, Cantabria, Spain.
Willis, J., & Crowder, J. (1974). Does tutoring enhance the tutor’s academic learning? Psychology in the Schools, 11
, 68–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar