Travel for reproductive health care has become a widespread global phenomenon. Within the field, the decision to travel to seek third parties to assist with reproduction is widely assumed to be autonomous. However there has been scant research exploring the application of the principle of autonomy to the experience of the cross-border traveller. Seeking to contribute to the growing, but still small, body of sociological bioethics research, this paper maps the application of the ethical principle of autonomy to the lived experience of infertile individuals who cross borders for reproductive care. It examines their choices as patient, consumer and traveller. It suggests that their experience evidences a contradictory autonomy, which offers them both choice and no choice in their final decision to travel. The paper argues that this lack of meaningful autonomy is enabled by a medicalised framework of infertility which prioritises technology as the cure to infertility. This both shapes expectations of infertile individuals and limits their options of family creation. Ultimately, the paper suggests that sociological bioethics research shows that the liberatory credentials of technology should be questioned, and identifies that this field demands greater scholarly attention.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
51.8 per cent of women aged 25–45 report infertility at some point in their lives and fewer than 50 percent of infertile women receive medical treatment (Greil et al. 2011).
While less relevant for Australia’s domestic legal system support for reproductive autonomy is found in international instruments (such as the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, the International Conference on Population and Development, and the European Convention on Human Rights).
This can be seen across medical law; see, for example, the use of the Bolam test for negligence (Brazier and Miola 2000).
One journalist calling it “terrifying” (Price 2017).
Unlike, for example, the fair trade movement (see Davenport and Low 2013: 89).
Alon, I., J. Guimon, and R. Urbanos-Garrido. 2019. Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 36 (8): 1665–1681.
Australian Business Register. (n.d.). Current details for ABN 80 129 643 492. https://abr.business.gov.au/ABN/View?abn=80129643492. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Australian Medical Council. (2009). Good Medical Practice: A Code of Conduct for Doctors in Australia. (Canberra: Australian Medical Council). https://www.amc.org.au/wp-content/uploads/about/good_medical_practice/2009-07_Final_Code.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Bailey, A. 2011. Reconceiving surrogacy: Toward a reproductive justice account of indian surrogacy. Hypatia 26 (4): 715–741.
Bartholomaeus, C., and D.W. Riggs. 2018. Embryo donation and receipt in Australia: views on the meanings of embryos and kinship relations. New Genetics and Society 38 (1): 1–17.
Beauchamp, T.L. 2004. Does Ethical Theory Have a Future in Bioethics? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 32 (2): 209–217.
Beauchamp, T., and J. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bell, A.V. 2010. Beyond (financial) accessibility: inequalities within the medicalisation of infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness 32 (4): 631–646.
Bentley, P., Smyth, S. & Faulkner, K. (2017). Crackdown on the IVF cowboys after probe reveals financial incentives to entice women into giving away eggs. Daily Mail, September 13. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/paper-4878048/Crackdown-IVF-cowboys-probe.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Brazier, M., and J. Miola. 2000. Bye-bye Bolam: a medical litigation revolution? Medical Law Review 8 (1): 85–114.
Chambers, G.M., V.P. Hoang, and P.J. Illingworth. 2013. Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs. Human Reproduction 28 (11): 3111–3117.
Conrad, P. 1992. Medicalization and Social Control. Annual Review of Sociology 18: 209–232.
Conrad, P., and K.K. Barker. 2010. The social construction of illness: key insights and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51 (Suppl): S67–S69.
Conrad, P. and Leiter, V. (2004). Medicalization, markets and consumers. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(Extra Issue), 158–176.
Conrad, P., T. Mackie, and A. Mehrotra. 2010. Estimating the cost of medicalization. Social Science & Medicine 70 (2): 1943–1947.
Corea, G. 1985. The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. New York: Harper & Row.
Couture, V., R. Drouin, J. Moutquin, P. Monnier, and C. Bouffard. 2019. Reproductive outsourcing: an empirical ethics account of cross-border reproductive care in Canada. Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (1): 41–47.
Cresswell v Attorney-General for the State of Queensland  QSC 142. Re Evelyn (1998) 145 FLR 90.
Culley, L., Hudson, N. & van Rooij, F. (2009). Introduction: Ethnicity, infertility and assisted reproductive technologies. (In L. Culley, N. Hudson, & F. van Rooij (Eds.), Marginalized reproduction: Ethnicity, infertility, and reproductive technologies (pp. 1–14). London: Earthscan.)
Culley, L., N. Hudson, F. Rapport, E. Blyth, W. Norton, and A.A. Pacey. 2011. Crossing borders for fertility treatment: motivations, destinations and outcomes of UK fertility travellers. Human Reproduction 26 (9): 2373–2381.
Dancet, E.A., I.W. Van Empel, P. Rober, W.L. Nelen, J.A. Kremer, and T.M. D’Hoogheet. 2011. Patient-centred infertility care: a qualitative study to listen to the patient’s voice. Human Reproduction 26 (4): 827–833.
Davenport, E., and W. Low. 2013. From trust to compliance: accountability in the fair trade movement. Social Enterprise Journal 9 (1): 88–101.
de Lacey, S. 2002. IVF as lottery or investment: contesting metaphors in discourses of infertility. Nursing Inquiry 9 (1): 43–51.
Donchin, A. 2011. In Whose Interest? Policy and Politics in Assisted Reproduction. Bioethics 25 (2): 92–101.
Dorr Goold, S., and M. Lipkin. 1999. The Doctor-patient relationship: Challenges, opportunities and strategies. Journal of General Internal Medicine 14 (1): 26–33.
Dworkin, G. (1988). The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).
Farrell, A., J. Devereux, I. Karpin, and P. Weller. 2017. Health Law: Frameworks and Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FertilitySA. (2018). The top 3 reasons infertility is on the rise. FertilitySA, January 11. https://fertilitysa.com.au/2018/01/11/the-top-3-reasons-fertility-is-on-the-rise/. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Firestone, S. 1970. The dialectic of sex: The case for feminist revolution. New York: Morrow.
Foster, C. 2009. Choosing Life, Choosing Death: The Tyranny of Autonomy in Medical Ethics and Law. Oxford, UK: Hart.
Fox, R.C., and J. Swazey. 2008. Observing Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franklin, S. 1997. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London and New York: Routledge.
Franklin, S. 2013. Conception through a looking glass. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 27 (6): 747–755.
Gerrits, T. 2014. The ambiguity of patient-centred practices: the case of a Dutch fertility clinic. Anthropology & Medicine 21 (2): 125–135.
Global Market Insights. 2016. Industry Trends: Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Market Size by Procedure. Ocean View: Global Market Insights.
Gorton, M. (2019). Helping Victorians create families with assisted reproductive treatment: Final Report of the Independent Review of Assisted Reproductive Treatment. (Melbourne: Department of Health and Human Services).
Greil, A.L., T.A. Leitko, and K.L. Porter. 1988. Infertility: His and hers. Gender and Society 2 (2): 172–199.
Greil, A.L., K. Slauson-Blevins, and J. McQuillan. 2010. The Experience of Infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health and Illness 32 (1): 140–162.
Greil, A.L., J. McQuillan, and K. Slauson-Blevins. 2011. The social construction of infertility. Sociology Compass 5 (8): 736–746.
Hall, M.A., E. Dugan, B. Zheng, and A.K. Mishra. 2001. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? The Milbank Quarterly 79 (4): 613–639.
Hodsona, N., and S. Bewley. 2019. Abuse in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic qualitative review and typology. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 238: 170–177.
Inhorn, M.C., and P. Patrizio. 2009. Rethinking reproductive ‘tourism’ as reproductive ‘exile.’ Fertility and Sterility 92 (3): 904–906.
Inhorn, M.C., and P. Patrizio. 2012. Procreative tourism: debating the meaning of cross-border reproductive care in the 21st century. Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 7 (6): 509–511.
Law Reform Committee. (2012). Inquiry into Access by Donor-Conceived People to Information about Donors. (Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria). https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/papers/govpub/VPARL2010-14No120.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2019
Jackson, E. 2001. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Jackson, E., J. Millbank, I. Karpin, and A. Stuhmcke. 2017. Learning from cross-border reproduction. Medical Law Review 25 (1): 23–46.
Jordan, C.B., C.D. Belar, and R.S. Williams. 2004. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up analysis of donors’ experiences. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetric Gynaecology 25 (2): 145–151.
Kidspot. (2016). IVF: “Our optimism drains away with every month”. Whimn, May 30. https://www.kidspot.com.au/birth/conception/ivf/ivf-our-optimism-drains-away-with-every-month/news-story/ddf011360977bb5e473a21b4e1089ef0. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.
Knoepfler, P. 2016. GMO Sapiens: The Life-Changing Science of Designer Babies. Singapore: World Scientific.
Krolokke, C. (2017). Negotiating Nationality and Fertility when Travelling for Eggs. (In M. Lie & N. Lykke (Eds.), Assisted Reproduction Across Borders: Feminist Perspectives on Normalizations, Disruptions and Transmissions (pp. 61–71). (New York: Routledge).
LaFrenz, C. (2018). Virtus Health says artificial intelligence has potential to make IVF babies. Australian Financial Review, June 27.
Lawson, A.K., J.E. Zweifel, and S.C. Klock. 2016. Blurring the line between life and death: a review of the psychological and ethical concerns related to posthumous-assisted reproduction. The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care 21 (5): 339–346.
Leyser-Whalen, O., A.L. Greil, J. McQuillan, K.M. Johnson, and K.M. Shrefffler. 2018. ‘Just because a doctor says something, doesn’t mean that [it] will happen’: self-perception as having a Fertility Problem among Infertility Patients. Sociology of Health and Illness 40 (3): 445–462.
Lindemann, K. (2018). I’m a feminist. So why does infertility make me feel like a failure? The Guardian, November 2.
Lupton, D., C. Donaldson, and P. Lloyd. 1991. Caveat emptor or blissful ignorance? Patients and the consumerist ethos. Social Science & Medicine 33 (5): 559–568.
Mackenzie, C., and N. Stoljar. 2000. Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Malin, M., E. Hemmink, O. Räikkönen, S. Sihvo, and M.L. Perälä. 2001. What do women want? Women’s experiences of infertility treatment. Social Science & Medicine 53 (1): 123–133.
McLean, S. 2010. Autonomy, Consent and the Law. London: Routledge.
Medical Board of Australia. (2018). Sexual boundaries in the doctor-patient relationship. https://www.medicalboard.gov.au/codes-guidelines-policies/sexual-boundaries-guidelines.aspx. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Mendel, J. 2007. The patient, the doctor and the family as aspects of community: New models of informed consent. Monash Bioethics Review 26 (1–2): 68–78.
Meyers, D.T. 1989. Self, Society and Personal Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mill, J.S. 1909. On Liberty. Boston: P. F. Collier & Son.
Millbank, J. 2018. The role of professional facilitators in cross-border assisted reproduction. Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online 6: 60–71.
Millbank, J. 2019. What is the responsibility of australian medical professionals whose patients travel abroad for assisted reproduction? Medical Law Review 27 (3): 365–389.
Milligan, E. & Jones, J. (2017). Rethinking Autonomy and Consent in Healthcare Ethics. (In P. A. Clark (Ed.), Bioethics – Medical, Ethical and Legal Perspectives. IntechOpen). https://www.intechopen.com/books/bioethics-medical-ethical-and-legal-perspectives/rethinking-autonomy-and-consent-in-healthcare-ethics. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Montgomery, R. (2016). WHO considers new definition of infertility that includes being single. BIO News, October 24. https://www.bionews.org.uk/page_95744. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Morgan, K. (1998). Contested bodies, contested knowledges: women, health, and the politics of medicalisation. (In S. Sherwin (Ed.), The politics of women’s health: exploring agency and autonomy (pp. 83–121). (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Morgan, D. (1998). Frameworks of analysis for feminisms’ accounts of reproductive technology. (In S. Sheldon (Ed.), Feminist Perspectives on Health Care Law (1 edition). (London: Routledge-Cavendish).
Nahman, M. 2011. Reverse traffic: Intersecting qualities in human egg donation. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 23 (5): 626–633.
Nedelsky, J. 1989. Reconceiving Autonomy: Sources, Thoughts and Possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 1: 7–36.
Nelson, E. 2013. Law, Policy and Reproductive Autonomy. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Paton, A. 2018. About time: how time influences and facilitates patient autonomy in the clinical encounter. Monash Bioethics Review 36: 68–85.
Paul, M. (2004). Fertility clinics a ‘wild west’. Chicago Tribune, February 4. https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-xpm-2004-02-04-0402040021-story.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Pennings, G., G. de Wert, F. Shenfield, J. Cohen, B. Tarlatzis, and P. Devroey. 2008. ESHRE Task Force on ethics and law 15: Cross-border reproductive care. Human Reproduction 23 (10): 2182–2184.
Pierret, J. 2003. The illness experience: state of knowledge and perspectives for research. Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3): 4–22.
Price, J. (2017). IVF: the only bonus paid should be a baby bonus. Sydney Morning Herald, September 11. https://www.smh.com.au/opinion/ivf-the-only-bonus-paid-should-be-a-baby-bonus-20170911-gyertn.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Purdy, L. 2006. Women’s reproductive autonomy: medicalisation and beyond. Journal of Medical Ethics 36: 287–291.
Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. (2016). Cross Border Reproductive Care. https://ranzcog.edu.au/RANZCOG_SITE/media/RANZCOG-MEDIA/Women%27s%20Health/Statement%20and%20guidelines/Clinical%20-%20Gynaecology/Cross-Border-Reproductive-Care-(C-Gyn-36)-New-March-2016.pdf?ext=.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Rich, A. 1977. Of Women Born: Motherhood as Experience and Institution. London: Virago.
Robertson, J. 1994. Children of choice: freedom and the new reproductive technologies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ross, H.L. 1982. Deterring the Drinking Driver: Legal Policy and Social Control, 2nd ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
Ross, H.L. 1992. Confronting Drunk Driving: Social Policy for Saving Lives. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Rowland, R. 1987. Technology and Motherhood: Reproductive Choice Reconsidered. Signs 12 (3): 512–528.
Salleh, A. (2018). Egg timer test for fertility: What is it and does it work? ABC News, September 23. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2018-09-23/what-is-an-egg-timer-test-for-fertility-and-does-it-work/10234086. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Sandel, M.J. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sandelowski, M. 1991. Compelled to try: The never-enough quality of conceptive technology. Medical Anthroplogy Quarterly 5 (1): 29–47.
Savulescu, J., and G. Kahane. 2009. The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics 23 (5): 274–290.
Schneider, C.E. 1998. The Practice of Autonomy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sherwin, S. (1998). A Relational Approach to Autonomy in Health Care. (In S. Sherwin (Ed.), The Politics of Women’s Health: Exploring Agency and Autonomy (pp. 19–47). Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Smart, C. 2002. Feminism and the Power of Law. New York: Routledge.
Snyder, J., V.A. Crooks, R. Johnston, and S. Dharamsi. 2013. “Do Your Homework… and Then Hope for the Best”: The Challenges That Medical Tourism Poses to Canadian Family Physicians’ Support of Patients’ Informed Decision-Making. BMC Medical Ethics 14: 37.
Spar, D. L. (2011). Fertility Industry is a Wild West, September 13. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2011/09/13/making-laws-about-making-babies/fertility-industry-is-a-wild-west. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Speier, A. 2016. Fertility Holidays: IVF Tourism and The Reproduction of Whiteness. New York: New York University Press.
Storrow, R. 2010. The pluralism problem in cross border reproductive care. Human Reproduction 25 (12): 2939–2943.
van Empel, I.W., E.A. Dancet, X.H. Koolman, W.L. Nelen, E.A. Stolk, W. Sermeus, T.M. D’Hooghe, and J.A. Kremer. 2011. Physicians underestimate the importance of patient-centredness to patients: a discrete choice experiment in fertility care. Human Reproduction 26 (3): 584–593.
Virtus Health. (2017). Virtus Health Australia’s leading Fertility group delivers patient care. September 17. https://www.virtushealth.com.au/virtus-health-australia’s-leading-fertility-group-delivers-patient-care. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Virtus Health. 2018. Annual Report. Sydney: Virtus Health.
Waldby, C. 2019. The Oocyte Economy. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
Waldby, C., and M. Cooper. 2008. The biopolitics of reproduction. Australian Feminist Studies 23 (55): 57–73.
Wangmo, T., and V. Provoost. 2017. The use of empirical research in bioethics: A survey of researchers in twelve European countries. BMC Medical Ethics 18: 79.
Whittaker, A., and A. Speier. 2010. “Cycling overseas”: care, commodification, and stratification in cross-border reproductive travel. Medical Anthropology 29 (4): 363–383.
World Health Organisation (n.d.). Infertility definitions and terminology. https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/infertility/definitions/en/. Accessed 11 Oct 2019.
Zadoroznyj, M. 2001. Birth and the “reflexive consumer”: trust, risk and medical dominance in obstetric encounters. Journal of Sociology 37 (2): 117–139.
This research was funded by Australian Research Council Grant DP 1510157. Thanks to Jenni Millbank, Isabel Karpin and Norman O’Dowd for comments on earlier versions of this paper and to Miranda Kaye, Rachel Carr, Norman O’Dowd, Michaela Stockey-Bridge and Susan Chandler for research assistance on the project and to our interview participants for sharing their views and thoughts.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Stuhmcke, A. Reflections on autonomy in travel for cross border reproductive care. Monash Bioeth. Rev. 39, 1–27 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-020-00125-x
- Cross border reproductive care
- Assisted reproductive technology