Systems thinking and ethics in public health: a necessary and mutually beneficial partnership
Systems thinking has emerged as a means of conceptualizing and addressing complex public health problems, thereby challenging more commonplace understanding of problems and corresponding solutions as straightforward explanations of cause and effect. Systems thinking tries to address the complexity of problems through qualitative and quantitative modeling based on a variety of systems theories, each with their own assumptions and, more importantly, implicit and unexamined values. To date, however, there has been little engagement between systems scientists and those working in bioethics and public health ethics. The goal of this paper is to begin to consider what it might mean to combine systems thinking with public health ethics to solve public health challenges. We argue that there is a role for ethics in systems thinking in public health as a means of elucidating implicit assumptions and facilitating ethics debate and dialogue with key stakeholders.
KeywordsPublic health ethics Social networks Systems dynamimcs Systems thinking
We would like to thank James Wilson for his important and helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the Fondation Brocher; Diego Silva and Maxwell Smith were fellows there when much of the conceptualization of this paper occurred.
- Forrester, J.W. 1969. Urban Dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jackson, M.C. 2003. Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Plsek, P.E. (2003) Complexity and the Adoption of Innovation in Health Care. Washington, D.C.: The National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation and the National Committee for Quality Health Care. Retrieved November 6, 2017. http://www.nihcm.org/pdf/Plsek.pdf.
- Powers, M., and R. Faden. 2006. Social Justice: The Moral Foundations of Public Health and Health Policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pruyt, E., and Kwakkel, J. (2007) Combining system dynamics and ethics: towards more science?” System Dynamics Society. Retrieved November 6, 2017. http://www.systemdynamics.org/conferences/2007/proceed/papers/PRUYT232.pdf.
- Silva, D.S., J.L. Gibson, A. Robertson, et al. 2012. Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of the Canadian public’s perspectives. BMC: Public Health 12: 241.Google Scholar
- Smith, M.J., C. Bensimon, D. Perez, et al. 2012. Restrictive measures in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of public perspectives. Canadian Journal of Public Health 103(5): e348–e352.Google Scholar
- Snowden, D.J. 2005. Multi-ontology sense making: a new simplicity in decision making. Informatics in Primary Care 13: 45–53.Google Scholar
- Upshur, R.E.G. 2002. Principles for the justification of public health intervention. Canadian Journal of Public Health 93 (2): 101–103.Google Scholar
- Williams, B., and S. Hof. 2016. Wicked Solutions: A Complex Approach to Complex Problems. North Carolina: Lulu.com.Google Scholar