Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reovirus: Friend and Foe

  • Virology (A Nicola, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Clinical Microbiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Mammalian orthoreovirus (reovirus) is a powerful tool for studying viral replication and pathogenesis. Most reovirus infections are subclinical; however, recent work has catapulted reovirus into the clinical spotlight.

Recent Findings

Owing to its capacity to kill cancer cells more efficiently than normal cells, reovirus is under development as a therapeutic for a variety of cancers. New efforts have focused on genetically engineering of reovirus to increase its oncolytic capacity, and determining how reovirus potentiates immunotherapy. Other recent studies highlight a potential role for reovirus in celiac disease (CeD). Using mouse models of CeD, reovirus caused loss of oral tolerance to dietary antigens, opening the possibility that reovirus could trigger CeD in humans.

Summary

We will focus on new developments in reovirus oncolysis and studies suggesting a role for reovirus as a trigger for celiac disease (CeD) that makes reovirus a potential friend and foe to human health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Sabin AB. Reoviruses. A new group of respiratory and enteric viruses formerly classified as ECHO type 10 is described. Science. 1959;130(3386):1387–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gomatos PJ, Tamm I, Dales S, Franklin RM. Reovirus type 3: physical characteristics and interaction with L cells. Virology. 1962;17:441–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dermody TS, Parker JSL, Sherry B. Orthoreovirus. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins; 2013. p. 1304–46.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tai JH, Williams JV, Edwards KM, Wright PF, Crowe JE Jr, Dermody TS. Prevalence of reovirus-specific antibodies in young children in Nashville, Tennessee. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(8):1221–4. https://doi.org/10.1086/428911.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellamy AR, Shapiro L, August JT, Joklik WK. Studies on reovirus RNA. I. Characterization of reovirus genome RNA. J Mol Biol. 1967;29(1):1–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Millward S, Graham AF. Structural studies on reovirus: discontinuities in the genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1970;65(2):422–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Barton ES, Forrest JC, Connolly JL, Chappell JD, Liu Y, Schnell FJ, et al. Junction adhesion molecule is a receptor for reovirus. Cell. 2001;104(3):441–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell JA, Schelling P, Wetzel JD, Johnson EM, Forrest JC, Wilson GA, et al. Junctional adhesion molecule a serves as a receptor for prototype and field-isolate strains of mammalian reovirus. J Virol. 2005;79(13):7967–78. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.79.13.7967-7978.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dermody TS, Nibert ML, Bassel-Duby R, Fields BN. A sigma 1 region important for hemagglutination by serotype 3 reovirus strains. J Virol. 1990;64(10):5173–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Barton ES, Connolly JL, Forrest JC, Chappell JD, Dermody TS. Utilization of sialic acid as a coreceptor enhances reovirus attachment by multistep adhesion strengthening. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(3):2200–11. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M004680200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maginnis MS, Mainou BA, Derdowski A, Johnson EM, Zent R, Dermody TS. NPXY motifs in the beta1 integrin cytoplasmic tail are required for functional reovirus entry. J Virol. 2008;82(7):3181–91. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01612-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Maginnis MS, Forrest JC, Kopecky-Bromberg SA, Dickeson SK, Santoro SA, Zutter MM, et al. Beta1 integrin mediates internalization of mammalian reovirus. J Virol. 2006;80(6):2760–70. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.80.6.2760-2770.2006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Ebert DH, Deussing J, Peters C, Dermody TS. Cathepsin L and cathepsin B mediate reovirus disassembly in murine fibroblast cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(27):24609–17. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201107200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Joklik WK. Studies on the effect of chymotrypsin on reovirions. Virology. 1972;49(3):700–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Borsa J, Copps TP, Sargent MD, Long DG, Chapman JD. New intermediate subviral particles in the in vitro uncoating of reovirus virions by chymotrypsin. J Virol. 1973;11(4):552–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Dryden KA, Wang G, Yeager M, Nibert ML, Coombs KM, Furlong DB, et al. Early steps in reovirus infection are associated with dramatic changes in supramolecular structure and protein conformation: analysis of virions and subviral particles by cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction. J Cell Biol. 1993;122(5):1023–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Joklik WK. The molecular biology of reovirus. J Cell Physiol. 1970;76(3):289–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.1040760308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bellamy AR, Joklik WK. Studies on reovirus RNA. II. Characterization of reovirus messenger RNA and of the genome RNA segments from which it is transcribed. J Mol Biol. 1967;29(1):19–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Excoffon KJ, Guglielmi KM, Wetzel JD, Gansemer ND, Campbell JA, Dermody TS, et al. Reovirus preferentially infects the basolateral surface and is released from the apical surface of polarized human respiratory epithelial cells. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(8):1189–97. https://doi.org/10.1086/529515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lai CM, Boehme KW, Pruijssers AJ, Parekh VV, Van Kaer L, Parkos CA, et al. Endothelial JAM-A promotes reovirus viremia and bloodstream dissemination. J Infect Dis. 2014;211:383–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiu476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tyler KL, McPhee DA, Fields BN. Distinct pathways of viral spread in the host determined by reovirus S1 gene segment. Science. 1986;233(4765):770–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tardieu M, Weiner HL. Viral receptors on isolated murine and human ependymal cells. Science. 1982;215(4531):419–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiner HL, Tardieu M, Epstein RL, Fontana A, Powers ML. Viral interactions with receptors in the central nervous system and on lymphocytes. Prog Brain Res. 1983;59:23–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(08)63848-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Raine CS, Fields BN. Reovirus type 3 encephalitis--a virologic and ultrastructural study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1973;32(1):19–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiner HL, Drayna D, Averill DR Jr, Fields BN. Molecular basis of reovirus virulence: role of the S1 gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977;74(12):5744–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Fields BN. Molecular basis of reovirus virulence. Arch Virol. 1982;71(2):95–107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Goody RJ, Schittone SA, Tyler KL. Experimental reovirus-induced acute flaccid paralysis and spinal motor neuron cell death. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2008;67(3):231–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/NEN.0b013e31816564f0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Phillips MB, Stuart JD, Rodriguez Stewart RM, Berry JT, Mainou BA, Boehme KW. Current understanding of reovirus oncolysis mechanisms. Oncolytic Virother. 2018;7:53–63. https://doi.org/10.2147/OV.S143808.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21387.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2019. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/home. Accessed 12 May 2019.

  31. National Cancer Institute. 2019. https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/side-effects. Accessed 10 May 2019.

  32. Dagogo-Jack I, Shaw AT. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(2):81–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miest TS, Cattaneo R. New viruses for cancer therapy: meeting clinical needs. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hobbs GA, Der CJ, Rossman KL. RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2016;129(7):1287–92. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.182873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Fernandes J. Oncogenes: the passport for viral oncolysis through PKR inhibition. Biomark Cancer. 2016;8:101–10. https://doi.org/10.4137/BIC.S33378.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams BR. PKR; a sentinel kinase for cellular stress. Oncogene. 1999;18(45):6112–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Farassati F, Yang AD, Lee PW. Oncogenes in Ras signalling pathway dictate host-cell permissiveness to herpes simplex virus 1. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(8):745–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/35087061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Strong JE, Coffey MC, Tang D, Sabinin P, Lee PW. The molecular basis of viral oncolysis: usurpation of the Ras signaling pathway by reovirus. EMBO J. 1998;17(12):3351–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.12.3351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Pansky A, Hildebrand P, Fasler-Kan E, Baselgia L, Ketterer S, Beglinger C, et al. Defective Jak-STAT signal transduction pathway in melanoma cells resistant to growth inhibition by interferon-alpha. Int J Cancer. 2000;85(5):720–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang KX, Matsui Y, Hadaschik BA, Lee C, Jia W, Bell JC, et al. Down-regulation of type I interferon receptor sensitizes bladder cancer cells to vesicular stomatitis virus-induced cell death. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(4):830–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.25088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Katze MG, He Y, Gale M Jr. Viruses and interferon: a fight for supremacy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2(9):675–87. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri888.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Borden EC. Interferons alpha and beta in cancer: therapeutic opportunities from new insights. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(3):219–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-018-0011-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Schneider WM, Chevillotte MD, Rice CM. Interferon-stimulated genes: a complex web of host defenses. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32:513–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Davola ME, Mossman KL. Oncolytic viruses: how “lytic” must they be for therapeutic efficacy? Oncoimmunology. 2019;8(6):e1581528. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2019.1596006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wheelock EF, Dingle JH. Observations on the repeated administration of viruses to a patient with acute leukemia. A preliminary report. N Engl J Med. 1964;271:645–51. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196409242711302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Asada T. Treatment of human cancer with mumps virus. Cancer. 1974;34(6):1907–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. • Conry RM, Westbrook B, McKee S, Norwood TG. Talimogene laherparepvec: first in class oncolytic virotherapy. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(4):839–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2017.1412896 This review describes talimogene laherparepvec, the first virus approved for use as a cancer therapeutic.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Liu BL, Robinson M, Han ZQ, Branston RH, English C, Reay P, et al. ICP34.5 deleted herpes simplex virus with enhanced oncolytic, immune stimulating, and anti-tumour properties. Gene Ther. 2003;10(4):292–303. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3301885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2017. clinicaltrials.gov.

  50. Bourhill T, Mori Y, Rancourt DE, Shmulevitz M, Johnston RN. Going (reo)viral: factors promoting successful reoviral oncolytic infection. Viruses. 2018;10(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/v10080421.

  51. Zhao X, Chester C, Rajasekaran N, He Z, Kohrt HE. Strategic combinations: the future of oncolytic virotherapy with reovirus. Mol Cancer Ther. 2016;15(5):767–73. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pan D, Marcato P, Ahn DG, Gujar S, Pan LZ, Shmulevitz M, et al. Activation of p53 by chemotherapeutic agents enhances reovirus oncolysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Roulstone V, Twigger K, Zaidi S, Pencavel T, Kyula JN, White C, et al. Synergistic cytotoxicity of oncolytic reovirus in combination with cisplatin-paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy. Gene Ther. 2013;20(5):521–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2012.68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Sei S, Mussio JK, Yang QE, Nagashima K, Parchment RE, Coffey MC, et al. Synergistic antitumor activity of oncolytic reovirus and chemotherapeutic agents in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2009;8:47. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-8-47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. McEntee G, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Smith H, Wilkinson M, Gregory C, et al. Enhanced cytotoxicity of reovirus and radiotherapy in melanoma cells is mediated through increased viral replication and mitochondrial apoptotic signalling. Oncotarget. 2016;7(30):48517–32. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Kobayashi T, Antar AA, Boehme KW, Danthi P, Eby EA, Guglielmi KM, et al. A plasmid-based reverse genetics system for animal double-stranded RNA viruses. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;1(2):147–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.03.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kobayashi T, Ooms LS, Ikizler M, Chappell JD, Dermody TS. An improved reverse genetics system for mammalian orthoreoviruses. Virology. 2010;398(2):194–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2009.11.037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Roner MR, Joklik WK. Reovirus reverse genetics: incorporation of the CAT gene into the reovirus genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(14):8036–41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.131203198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Roner MR, Steele BG. Features of the mammalian orthoreovirus 3 Dearing l1 single-stranded RNA that direct packaging and serotype restriction. J Gen Virol. 2007;88(Pt 12):3401–12. https://doi.org/10.1099/vir.0.83209-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Roner MR, Steele BG. Localizing the reovirus packaging signals using an engineered m1 and s2 ssRNA. Virology. 2007;358(1):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2006.08.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Demidenko AA, Blattman JN, Blattman NN, Greenberg PD, Nibert ML. Engineering recombinant reoviruses with tandem repeats and a tetravirus 2A-like element for exogenous polypeptide expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(20):E1867–76. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220107110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. • Kanai Y, Kawagishi T, Matsuura Y, Kobayashi T. In vivo live imaging of oncolytic mammalian orthoreovirus expressing NanoLuc luciferase in tumor xenograft mice. J Virol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00401-19 This study characterizes a replication-competent reovirus encoding a luciferase reporter gene to image reovirus infection of cancer cells in mice.

  63. Yousefi H, Yuan J, Keshavarz-Fathi M, Murphy JF, Rezaei N. Immunotherapy of cancers comes of age. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017;13(10):1001–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2017.1366315.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Murphy JP, Kim Y, Clements DR, Konda P, Schuster H, Kowalewski DJ, Paulo JA, Cohen AM, Stevanovic S, Gygi SP, Gujar S. 2019. Therapy-Induced MHC I Ligands Shape Neo-Antitumor CD8 T Cell Responses during Oncolytic Virus-Based Cancer Immunotherapy. J Proteome Res 18:2666–2675.

  65. Prestwich RJ, Errington F, Ilett EJ, Morgan RS, Scott KJ, Kottke T, et al. Tumor infection by oncolytic reovirus primes adaptive antitumor immunity. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(22):7358–66. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Prestwich RJ, Errington F, Steele LP, Ilett EJ, Morgan RS, Harrington KJ, et al. Reciprocal human dendritic cell-natural killer cell interactions induce antitumor activity following tumor cell infection by oncolytic reovirus. J Immunol. 2009;183(7):4312–21. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. •• Samson A, Scott KJ, Taggart D, West EJ, Wilson E, Nuovo GJ, et al. Intravenous delivery of oncolytic reovirus to brain tumor patients immunologically primes for subsequent checkpoint blockade. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10(422). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aam7577 This study assessed how reovirus contributes to immunotherapy in patients with brain tumors.

  68. Green PH, Jabri B. Celiac disease. Annu Rev Med. 2006;57:207–21. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.med.57.051804.122404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Pabst O, Mowat AM. Oral tolerance to food protein. Mucosal Immunol. 2012;5(3):232–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2012.4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hinterleitner R, Jabri B. A dendritic cell subset designed for oral tolerance. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(5):474–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.3435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Tjon JM, van Bergen J, Koning F. Celiac disease: how complicated can it get? Immunogenetics. 2010;62(10):641–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-010-0465-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Plot L, Amital H. Infectious associations of celiac disease. Autoimmun Rev. 2009;8(4):316–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2008.10.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Abadie V, Sollid LM, Barreiro LB, Jabri B. Integration of genetic and immunological insights into a model of celiac disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2011;29:493–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-040210-092915.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lerner A, Arleevskaya M, Schmiedl A, Matthias T. Microbes and viruses are bugging the gut in celiac disease. Are they friends or foes? Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1392. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01392.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. •• Bouziat R, Hinterleitner R, Brown JJ, Stencel-Baerenwald JE, Ikizler M, Mayassi T, et al. Reovirus infection triggers inflammatory responses to dietary antigens and development of celiac disease. Science. 2017;356(6333):44–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5298 This study revealed that reovirus could cause loss of tolerance to oral antigens in mice.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Bouziat R, Biering SB, Kouame E, Sangani KA, Kang S, Ernest JD, et al. Murine norovirus infection induces TH1 inflammatory responses to dietary antigens. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24(5):677–88 e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2018.10.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Public Health Award R01 AI118801 (to K.W.B.). Additional support was provided by the Center for Microbial Pathogenesis and Host Inflammatory Response (P20 GM103625).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl W. Boehme.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Virology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eledge, M.R., Zita, M.D. & Boehme, K.W. Reovirus: Friend and Foe. Curr Clin Micro Rpt 6, 132–138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-019-00121-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40588-019-00121-8

Keywords

Navigation