Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Review of the Literature on Community Resilience and Disaster Recovery

  • Environmental Disasters (D Sandler and A Miller, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Environmental Health Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The concept of resilience continues to grow in influence and prominence in national and international programs seeking to improve individual and collective capacity to prepare for and respond to disasters. This review of the literature published in 2018 examines how disaster scholars and professionals are conceptualizing and applying the concept of community disaster resilience.

Recent Findings

Three trends in the literature on community disaster resilience are observed: (1) advancements in the measurement of resilience continue to refine the concept and its related mechanisms using both primary and secondary data, (2) social capital continues to be a central mechanism through which community resilience reduces disaster impact and enhances recovery, and (3) programs across the globe are advancing the practice of improving resilience through community interventions to enhancing adaptive capacities.

Summary

Community disaster resilience offers much promise as a guiding paradigm for the promotion of disaster risk reduction and the enabling of disaster recovery through attention to, and investment in, local capacities for adaptation to a changing and uncertain environment. However, there remains work to be done in the clarification of the concept and the operationalization of the mechanisms leading to enhancing community capacity for resilience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Norris FH, Stevens SP, Pfefferbaum B, Wyche KF, Pfefferbaum RL. Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(1–2):127–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9156-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. National Academies (US). Disaster resilience: a national imperative: National Academies Press; 2012. https://doi.org/10.17226/13457.

  3. Maini R, Clarke L, Blanchard K, Murray V. The Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction and its indicators—where does health fit in? Int J Disaster Risk Sci. 2017;8(2):150–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1662-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koliou M, van de Lindt JW, McAllister TP, Ellingwood BR, Dillard M, Cutler H. State of the research in community resilience: Progress and challenges. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct. 2017;1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547.

  5. Holling CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1973;41:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Uekusa S. Rethinking resilience: Bourdieu’s contribution to disaster research. Resilience. 2018;6(3):181–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2017.1308635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tiernan A, Drennan L, Nalau J, Onyango E, Morrissey L, Mackey B. A review of themes in disaster resilience literature and international practice since 2012. Policy Des Pract. 2018;2:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1507240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. • Matin N, Forrester J, Ensor J. What is equitable resilience? 2018:109:1970295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.04.020. This article articulates a vision for equitable resilience as a ‘middle range’ theory that can be observed and tested alongside existing measures of resilience. Unlike many of the extant operationalizations of resilience, equitable resilience takes into greater account social vulnerabilities and differential access to power, knowledge, and resources.

  9. Khazai B, Anhorn J, Burton CG. Resilience performance scorecard: measuring urban disaster resilience at multiple levels of geography with case study application to Lalitpur, Nepal. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;31:604–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rus K, Kilar V, Koren D. Resilience assessment of complex urban systems to natural disasters: a new literature review. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;31:311–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abenayake CC, Mikami Y, Matsuda Y, Jayasinghe A. Ecosystem services-based composite indicator for assessing community resilience to floods. Environ Dev. 2018;27:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Summers JK, Harwell LC, Smith LM, Buck KD. Measuring community resilience to natural hazards: the Natural Hazard Resilience Screening Index (NaHRSI)—development and application to the United States. GeoHealth. 2018;2(12):372–94. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GH000160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Saja AA, Teo M, Goonetilleke A, Ziyath AM. An inclusive and adaptive framework for measuring social resilience to disasters. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;28:862–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones L, Samman E, Vinck P. Subjective measures of household resilience to climate variability and change: insights from a nationally representative survey of Tanzania. Ecol Soc. 2018;23:1–9. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09840-230109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwok AH, Paton D, Becker J, Hudson-Doyle EE, Johnston D. A bottom-up approach to developing a neighbourhood-based resilience measurement framework. Disaster Prev Manag Int J. 2018;27(2):255–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2017-0169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuang WC, Garmestani A, Eason TN, Spanbauer TL, Fried-Petersen HB, Roberts CP, et al. Enhancing quantitative approaches for assessing community resilience. J Environ Manag. 2018;213:353–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. • Serfilippi E, Ramnath G. Resilience measurement and conceptual frameworks: a review of the literature. Ann Public Coop Econ. 2018;89(4):645–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/apce.12202. This article examines an extensive set of resilience concepts and indicators, linking each model of resilience to an application and set of indicators – bridging the diversity in various definitions and operationalizations that exist in the literature.

  18. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR). 2009 UNISDR terminology on disaster risk reduction. 2009. Geneva. http:www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology. Accessed 28 June 2019.

  19. United States Agency for International Development. Building resilience to recurrent crisis. USAID policy and programe guidance. 2012. https://www.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/1870/USAIDResiliencePolicyGuidanceDocument.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2019.

  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO in emergencies. 2019. http://www.fao.org/emergencies/how-we-work/resilience/en/. Accessed 28 June 2019.

  21. NYU Marron Institute. 100 RC handbook: planning for resilient urban growth. 2018. NYU Marron Institute of Urban Management in collaboration with 100 Resilient Cities. https://www.100resilientcities.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/NYU-Urban-Growth-Handbook_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2019.

  22. Cai H, Lam NS, Qiang Y, Zou L, Correll RM, Mihunov V. A synthesis of disaster resilience measurement methods and indices. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;31:844–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.07.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Horney J, Dwyer C, Chirra B, McCarthy K, Shafer J, Smith G. Measuring successful disaster recovery. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2018;36(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12190. This article considers a substantial set of 79 publically available disaster recovery metrics. These metrics can improve how we assess resilience as an outcome by supporting proactive recovery planning.

  24. Zou L, Lam NS, Cai H, Qiang Y. Mining Twitter data for improved understanding of disaster resilience. Ann Am Assoc Geogr. 2018;108(5):1422–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1421897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kontokosta CE, Malik A. The resilience to emergencies and disasters index: applying big data to benchmark and validate neighborhood resilience capacity. Sustain Cities Soc. 2018;36:272–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zobel CW, Baghersad M, Zhang Y. An approach for quantifying the multidimensional nature of disaster resilience in the context of municipal service provision. In: Urban disaster resilience and security 2018. Cham: Springer. p. 239–59.

  27. Bertilsson L, Wiklund K, de Moura Tebaldi I, Rezende OM, Veról AP, Miguez MG. Urban flood resilience—a multi-criteria index to integrate flood resilience into urban planning. J Hydrol. 2018;573:970–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.06.052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moghadas M, Asadzadeh A, Vafeidis A, Fekete A, Kötter T. A multi-criteria approach for assessing urban flood resilience in Tehran, Iran. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2019;35:101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer MA. Social capital in disaster research. In: Handbook of disaster research. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 263–86.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Hikichi H, Aida J, Matsuyama Y, Tsuboya T, Kondo K, Kawachi I. Community-level social capital and cognitive decline after a natural disaster: a natural experiment from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Soc Sci Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.09.057.

  31. • Story WT, Tura H, Rubin J, Engidawork B, Ahmed A, Jundi F, Iddosa T, Abrha TH. Social capital and disaster preparedness in Oromia, Ethiopia: An evaluation of the “Women Empowered” approach. Soc Sci Med. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.08.027. This study examines the building of resilience in groups of Ethiopian women whose livelihoods are threatened by ongoing climate change. Through an assessment of an intervention to increase social and economic opportunities, the authors provide important insights into the mediating functions of social capital for disaster preparedness and resilience.

  32. Haney TJ. Paradise found? The emergence of social capital, place attachment, and civic engagement after disaster. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2018;36:2.

    Google Scholar 

  33. MacGillivray BH. Beyond social capital: the norms, belief systems, and agency embedded in social networks shape resilience to climatic and geophysical hazards. Environ Sci Pol. 2018;89:116–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sellberg MM, Ryan P, Borgström ST, Norström AV, Peterson GD. From resilience thinking to resilience planning: lessons from practice. J Environ Manag. 2018;217:906–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu W, Dugar S, McCallum I, Thapa G, See L, Khadka P, et al. Integrated participatory and collaborative risk mapping for enhancing disaster resilience. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform. 2018;7(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7020068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pandey CL. Making communities disaster resilient: challenges and prospects for community engagement in Nepal. Disaster Prev Manag Int J. 2019;28(1):106–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-05-2018-0156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Oktari RS, Shiwaku K, Munadi K, Shaw R. Enhancing community resilience towards disaster: the contributing factors of school-community collaborative network in the tsunami affected area in Aceh. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018;29:3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.07.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Osofsky JD, Osofsky HJ. Challenges in building child and family resilience after disasters. J Fam Soc Work. 2018;21(2):115–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2018.1427644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Coetzee C, Van Niekerk D, Raju E. Reconsidering disaster resilience: a nonlinear systems paradigm in agricultural communities in Southern Africa. Nat Hazards. 2018;90(2):777–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Demiroz F, Haase TW. The concept of resilience: a bibliometric analysis of the emergency and disaster management literature. Local Gov Stud. 2018;45:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1541796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Williams M, Chandra A, Spears A, Varda D, Wells K, Plough A, et al. Evaluating community partnerships addressing community resilience in Los Angeles, California. In: Int J Environ Res Public Health, vol. 154; 2018. p. 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040610.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Mayer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Environmental Disasters

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayer, B. A Review of the Literature on Community Resilience and Disaster Recovery. Curr Envir Health Rpt 6, 167–173 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00239-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-019-00239-3

Keywords

Navigation