Purpose of Review
This review integrates historical developments and key events in bringing ethics into epidemiology in general and into environmental epidemiology in particular. The goal is to provide context for and discern among the various approaches and motivations that drive the need for ethical conduct in support of the public interest.
The need for ethics guidelines in epidemiology is different from developments in other biomedical-related fields by virtue of its focus on populations rather than on individuals. The need for ethics guidelines in environmental epidemiology as a subspecialty of epidemiology stems from the larger scale of its mission than that of epidemiology per se.
Ethics guidelines in the field of environmental epidemiology have been established. They articulate not only the profession’s core values and mission, but more specifically, they address the environmental epidemiologist’s obligations to the participants in research, to colleagues, and to employers. They are the product of consensus, scholarship, and diligent stewardship over several decades. The next challenge is ensuring their value and impact. The forces that support professional and institutional success, and the power of special interests, are the major threats to achieving the goals of ethical conduct and research for the public good. In environmental epidemiology, these threats have global implications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •Of importance ••Of major importance
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Scientific Responsibility, Human Rights & Law Program: Part of the Center of Science, Policy, and Society Programs. 2016. https://www.aaas.org/program/scientific-responsibility-human-rights-law. Accessed 18 Oct 2016.
Chalk R, Frankel MS, Chafter SB. AAAS Professional Ethics Project: professional ethics activities in the scientific and engineering societies (AAAS Publication No. 80-R-4). AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility: Washington; 1980.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva: CIOMS/WHO; 2002.
Shuster E. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg code. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(20):1436–40.
Lindert J, Stein Y, Guggenheim H, Jaakkola JJK, Strous RD. How ethics failed—the role of psychiatrists and physicians in Nazi programs from exclusion to extermination, 1933-1945. Public Health Rev. 2013;34(1):1–25.
Sass HM. Reichsrundschreiben 1931: pre-Nuremberg German regulations concerning new therapy and human experimentation. J Med Philos. 1983;8(2):99–111.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis study at Tuskegee: the Tuskegee Timeline. 2013. http://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm. Accessed 18 Oct 2016.
International Military Tribunal. Trials of war criminals before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Vol. II: “The Medical Case”, “The Milch Case”. Washington: U.S: Government Printing Office; 1949. p. 181–2.
Dunn CM, Chadwick G. Protecting study volunteers in research: a manual for investigative sites. University of Rochester Medical Center: CenterWatch, Inc.; 1999.
World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Geneva. 1948. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-geneva/. Accessed 11 Oct 2016.
United Nations (UN). The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/. Accessed 11 Oct 2016.
World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 1964. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/. Accessed 9 Oct 2016.
World Medical Association (WMA). Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Office for Human Research Protections. 2016. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/. Accessed 18 Oct 2016.
•• International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE), Kramer S, Soskolne CL, Al-Delaimy WK, Mustapha BA. “Ethics guidelines for environmental epidemiologists” adopted on April 25, 2012. 2012. http://www.iseepi.org/About/Docs/ethics_guidelines_adopted_april_25_2012.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2016. The complete ISEE Guidelines for Environmental Epidemiology are available on the ISEE website.
Soskolne CL. Epidemiology: questions of science, ethics, morality, and law. Am J Epidemiol. 1989;129(1):1–18.
Metcalf J. Ethics codes: history, context, and challenges. Council for Big Data, Ethics, and Society. 2014. http://bdes.datasociety.net/council-output/ethics-codes-history-context-and-challenges/. Accessed 12 Oct 2016.
The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. 1979. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2016.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical. Ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45: Public Welfare, Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46). 2009. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html. Accessed 11 Oct 2016.
Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1966;274(24):1354–60.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office for Human Research Protections. International compilation of human research standards: 2016 Edition. 2016. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/internationalcomp2016.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2016.
Soskolne CL. Epidemiological research, interest groups, and the review process. J Public Health Policy. 1985;6(2):173–84.
Gordis L, Gold E, Seltser R. Privacy protection in epidemiologic and medical research: a challenge and a responsibility. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;105(3):163–8.
Susser M. Judgement and causal inference: criteria in epidemiologic studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;105(1):1–15.
Susser M, Stein Z, Kline J. Ethics in epidemiology. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci. 1978;437:128–41.
Soskolne CL, Zeighami EA. Research, interest groups, and the review process (Abstract #016). Paper presented at the 10th Scientific Meeting of the International Epidemiological Association, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 1984.
Soskolne CL. Should epidemiologists subscribe to a code of ethical conduct? (Abstract #68). Paper presented at the 11th Scientific Meeting of the International Epidemiological Association, Helsinki, Finland. 1987.
Industrial Epidemiology Forum’s Conference on Ethics in Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(Suppl 1):1S–169S.
International Epidemiological Association (IEA). IEA Guidelines for proper conduct in epidemiologic research. 2007. http://ieaweb.org/good-epidemiological-practice-gep/. Accessed 9 Oct 2016.
American College of Epidemiology (ACE). Ethics guidelines. 2003. http://acepidemiology.org/sites/default/files/EthicsGuide.pdf Accessed 9 Oct 2016.
American College of Epidemiology (ACE). American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8):487–97.
McKeown RE, Weed DL, Kahn JP, Stoto MA. American College of Epidemiology Ethics Guidelines: foundations and dissemination. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003;9:207–14.
Beauchamp TL, Cook RR, Fayerweather WE, Raabe GK, Thar WE, Cowles SR, et al. Ethical guidelines for epidemiologists. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44(Suppl 1):151s–69s.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS), in collaboration with the World Health Organization. International guidelines for ethical review of epidemiological studies. J Law Med Ethics. 1991;19(3–4):247–58.
Soskolne CL, Jhangri GS, Hunter B, Close M. Interim report on the Joint International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE)—Global Environmental Epidemiology Network (GEENET) ethics survey. Sci Total Environ. 1996;184(1,2):5–11.
Soskolne CL. (ed.). Proceedings of the symposium on ethics and law in environmental epidemiology. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol Part II. 1993;3(Suppl 1):243–319.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO/ISEE international workshop on ethical and philosophical issues in environmental epidemiology—report on a WHO meeting. Sci Total Environ. 1996;184(1–2):131–6.
Soskolne CL, Sieswerda LE. Implementing ethics in the professions: examples from environmental epidemiology. Sci Eng Ethics. 2003;9(2):181–90.
Soskolne CL, Light A. Towards ethics guidelines for environmental epidemiologists. Sci Total Environ. 1996;184(1–2):137–47.
International Society for Environmental Epidemiology (ISEE). Ethics guidelines for environmental epidemiologists. 1999. http://www.iseepi.org/About/Docs/ethicsguidelinesforenvironmentalepidemiologists.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2016.
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS). International ethical guidelines for epidemiological studies. Geneva: CIOMS/WHO; 2009.
Kramer S, Soskolne CL, Mustapha BA, Al-Delaimy WK. Revised ethics guidelines for environmental epidemiologists. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(8):a299–301.
International Statistical Institute (ISI). Declaration on professional ethics. 2010. https://www.isi-web.org/images/about/Declaration-EN2010.pdf. Accessed 9 Oct 2016.
Prineas RJ, Goodman K, Soskolne CL, Buck G, Feinleib M, Last J, et al. Findings from the American College of Epidemiology’s survey on ethics guidelines: the American College of Epidemiology Ethics and Standards of Practice Committee. Ann Epidemiol. 1998;8(8):482–9.
Richter E, Soskolne CL, LaDou J. Efforts to stop repression bias by protecting whistleblowers. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2001;7(1):68–71.
Coughlin SS. Ethics in epidemiology and public health practice. 2nd ed. Washington: American Public Health Association; 2009.
Coughlin SS. Ethics in epidemiology at the end of the 20th century: ethics, values, and mission statements. Epidemiol Rev. 2000;22(1):169–75.
Michaels D. Doubt is their product: how industry’s assault on science threatens your health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
• Friedman L, Friedman M. Financial conflicts of interest and study results in environmental and occupational health research. J Occup Environ Med. 2016;58(3):238–47. This study provides evidence of the tendency to report negative results in environmental epidemiological studies depending on the source of funding or sponsorship
Capps B. Can a good tree bring forth evil fruit? The funding of medical research by industry. Br Med Bull. 2016;118(1):5–15.
Wells EM. Evidence regarding the impact of conflicts of interest on environmental and occupational health research. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017; in press
Smith R. What is research misconduct? A background paper prepared for the Joint Consensus Conference on Misconduct in Biomedical Research. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2000;30:4–8.
• Nichols-Casebolt A, Macrina FL. Current perspectives regarding institutional conflict of interest : commentary on “Institutional conflicts of interest in academic research”. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015; doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9703-8. This Commentary addresses the risks to research integrity of iCOI, and the processes that may be implemented to manage them
Benner M, Sandstrom U. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Res Policy. 2000;29:291–301.
Resnik DB, Ariansen JL, Jamal J, Kissling GE. Institutional conflict of interest policies at U.S. academic research institutions. Acad Med. 2016;91(2):242–6.
Ehringhaus SH, Weissman JS, Sears JL, Goold SD, Feibelmann S, Campbell EG. Responses of medical schools to institutional conflicts of interest. JAMA. 2008;299:665–71.
Aaron DG, Siegel MB. Sponsorship of National Health Organizations by two major soda companies. Am J Prev Med. 2016; doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.010.
Tallapragada M, Eosco GM, McComas KA. Aware, yet ignorant: exploring the views of early career researchers about funding and conflicts of interests in science. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016; doi:10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3.
The authors acknowledge Stephanie M. Hikel for assistance in formatting and editing.
Conflict of Interest
Shira Kramer is the President and an owner of Epidemiology International, Inc. (EI). She has served as an expert witness on behalf of Plaintiffs in toxic, environmental, and pharmaceutical tort litigation. EI has performed research under contract for the US CDC, pharmaceutical companies, and private corporations.
Colin L. Soskolne is retired and unfunded since 2013. He served for a few years until 2012 as an expert witness in litigation on behalf of plaintiffs, the monies from which generally went into a University-managed research account. As a professional legacy, he has been bankrolling the International Joint Policy Committee of the Societies of Epidemiology (IJPC-SE) (2011–2016) as a voluntary professional society in the hope that it will become self-sustaining in the pursuit of science in the public interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Ethics and Policy
About this article
Cite this article
Kramer, S., Soskolne, C.L. Ethics Guidelines in Environmental Epidemiology: Their Development and Challenges We Face. Curr Envir Health Rpt 4, 142–155 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-017-0138-z
- Conflicting interests
- Code of ethics
- Normative practices
- Standards of practice
- Regulatory controls and implementation
- Funding and research sponsorship