Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation of collision characteristics of non-spherical particles on ductile surfaces under normal impact

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The particle–wall collision behavior plays a crucial role in determining particle motion during the simulation of multiphase flow processes. The coefficient of restitution (COR) is generally used to characterize the particle–wall collisional behavior. Correct consideration of COR is essential for obtaining accurate results in numerical simulations. In the present work, the COR during the normal impact of a rigid prolate ellipsoidal particle on the target wall is investigated using the finite element method. The loss in kinetic energy of the particles after impact is used to analyze the COR. The simulations are conducted with a particle of sphericity 1, 0.9, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.5 impacted at different orientation angles (angle between particle major axis to the horizontal plane) in the range 0°–90°. The effect of particle sphericity, particle orientation before impact, impact velocity, and target surface material on COR is determined. Further, an understanding is established on the deviation in COR for the impact of non-spherical particles as compared to the COR for the impact of spherical particles. The insights gained from this study are valuable for accurately predicting the motion of non-spherical particles in multiphase processes using the discrete element method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tarodiya R, Levy A (2021) Surface erosion due to particle surface interactions—a review. Powder Technol 387:527–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Brach RM (1984) Friction, restitution, and energy loss in planar collisions. J Appl Mech 51:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thornton C (1997) Coefficient of restitution for collinear collisions of elastic perfectly plastic spheres. J Appl Mech 64:383–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li LY, Wu CY, Thornton C (2001) A theoretical model for the contact of elastoplastic bodies. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C Mech Eng 216(4):421–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CY, Li LY, Thornton C (2003) Rebound behaviour of spheres for plastic impacts. Int J Impact Eng 28:929–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu CY, Thornton C, Li LY (2009) A semi-analytical model for oblique impacts of elastoplastic spheres. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 465(2103):937–960

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu K, Tafti D (2016) Impact model for micrometer-sized sand particles. Powder Technol 294:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Uzi A, Levy A (2018) Energy absorption by the particle and the surface during impact. Wear 404–405:92–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grant G, Tabakoff W (1975) Erosion prediction in turbomachinery resulting from environmental solid particles. J Aircraft 12:471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Forder A, Thew M, Harrison D (1998) A numerical investigation of solid particle erosion experienced within oilfield control valves. Wear 216:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yardeny I, Portnikov D, Kalman H (2020) Experimental investigation of the coefficient of restitution of particles colliding with surfaces in air and water. Adv Powder Tech 31:3747–3759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cai L, Wang S, Li Y, Mao J, Li F, Liu Z, Gao J (2021) Experimental and numerical studies on rebound characteristics of non-spherical particles impacting on stainless-steel at high temperature. Powder Technol 381:110–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hastie DB (2013) Experimental measurement of the coefficient of restitution of irregular shaped particles impacting on horizontal surfaces. Chem Eng Sci 101:828–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J, Zhang M, Feng L, Yang H, Wu Y, Yue G (2020) The behaviors of particle-wall collision for non-spherical particles: experimental investigation. Powder Technol 363:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brosh T, Kalman H, Levy A (2014) DEM-CFD simulation of particle comminution in jet-mill. Powder Technol 257:104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Uzi A, Levy A (2018) Flow characteristics of coarse particles in horizontal hydraulic conveying. Powder Technol 326:302–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tarodiya R, Khullar S, Levy A (2022) Particulate flow and erosion modeling of a Pelton turbine injector using CFD-DEM simulations. Powder Technol 399:117168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adesina P, O’Sullivan C, Wang T (2023) DEM study on the effect of particle shape on the shear behaviour of granular materials. Comput Part Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00632-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. de Arruda Tino AA, Tavares LM (2022) Simulating breakage tests using the discrete element method with polyhedral particles. Comput Part Mech 9:811–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu G, Third JR, Müller CR (2012) Critical assessment of two approaches for evaluating contacts between super-quadric shaped particles in dem simulations. Chem Eng Sci 78:226–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rakotonirina AD, Wachs A (2018) Grains3D, a flexible DEM approach for particles of arbitrary convex shape—part II: parallel implementation and scalable performance. Powder Technol 324:18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Höhner D, Wirtz S, Scherer V (2015) A study on the influence of particle shape on the mechanical interactions of granular media in a hopper using the discrete element method. Powder Technol 278:286–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kiangi K, Potapov A, Moys M (2013) DEM validation of media shape effects on the load behaviour and power in a dry pilot mill. Miner Eng 46–47:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ben-Ami Y, Levy A (2016) Absorbed shear energy during solid particle impact on ductile surface. Wear 368–369:162–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Eng Fract Mech 21:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dahneke B (1975) Further measurements of the bouncing of small latex spheres. J Colloid Interface Sci 51:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wall S, John W, Wang H, Goren SL (1990) Measurements of kinetic energy loss for particles impacting surfaces. Aerosol Sci Technol 12(4):926–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Tarodiya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarodiya, R., Levy, A. Numerical investigation of collision characteristics of non-spherical particles on ductile surfaces under normal impact. Comp. Part. Mech. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00746-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-024-00746-7

Keywords

Navigation