Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation on the scale dependence of shear mechanical behavior of rock joints using DEM simulation

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Estimating the shear mechanical parameters of field-scale joints using laboratory tested results is a challenging task due to the scale effect. To further understand the effect of specimen size on shear mechanical parameters, this study not only focuses on the joint length effect, but also explores the effect of specimen height (the dimension in the direction perpendicular to the joint surface), while the latter has not been paid enough attention in the existing studies. Based on the particle discrete element method, numerical direct shear experiments are carried out for multiple specimen height and joint length conditions. The effects of specimen height and joint length on the pre-peak, peak and post-peak shear deformation stages are analyzed in detail. The results suggest that specimen height also has an effect on the shear mechanical parameters of the joints. In the pre-peak deformation stage, the specimen height effect on shear stiffness is diametrically opposed to that of joint length, while the effect on shear strength is similar to that of joint length. In the post-peak crack evolution stage, the specimen height effect also differs from the joint length effect. In terms of significance, the effects of specimen height and joint length on the same shear mechanical parameter are almost at the same level. Therefore, future experimental studies may need to pay more attention to the specimen height effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meng F, Zhou H, Wang Z, Zhang L, Kong L, Li S, Zhang C (2016) Experimental study on the prediction of rockburst hazards induced by dynamic structural plane shearing in deeply buried hard rock tunnels. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 86:210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yang X, Sun D, Jing H (2020) Morphological features of shear-formed fractures developed in a rock bridge. Eng Geol 278(5):105833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng Y, Song Z, Yang T, Han J, Wang B, Zhang Z (2022) Investigating the aging damage evolution characteristics of layered hard sandstone using digital image correlation. Constr Build Mater 353:128828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pratt HR, Black AD, Braze WF (1974) Friction and deformation of jointed quartz diorite. In: Proceedings of 3rd ISRM conference, Denver, USA, 2A, pp 306–310

  5. Barton N, Bandis S (1982) Effect of block size on the shear behavior of jointed rock. In: Proceedings of the 23rd symposium on rock mechanics, Berkeley, pp 739–760

  6. Bandis S, Lumsden AC, Barton N (1981) Experimental studies of scale effect on the shear behaviour of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20:249–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(81)90262-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cunha A (1991) Scale effect in rock mechanics. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on scale effect in rock masses, Loen, Norway, pp 3–27

  8. Giani GP, Ferero AM, Passarello G, Reinaudo L (1992) Scale effect evaluation on natural discontinuity shear strength. In: Proceedings of the regional confernce on fractured and jointed rock masses, Lake Tahoe, pp 447–452

  9. Barton N (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13(9):255–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(76)90003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fardin N, Stephansson O, Jing L (2001) The scale dependence of rock joint surface roughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(5):659–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(01)00028-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ueng TS, Jou YJ, Peng IH (2010) Scale effect on shear strength of computer-aided-manufactured joints. J Geoeng 5(2):29–37. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.2010.5(2).1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vallier F, Mitani Y, Boulon M, Esaki T, Pellet F (2010) A shear model accounting scale effect in rock joints behavior. Rock Mech Rock Eng 43(5):581–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-009-0074-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Du S, Huang M, Luo Z, Jia R (2010) Similar material study of mechanical prototype test of rock structural plane. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29(11):2263–2270 ((In Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang M, Du S, Luo Z, Ni X (2013) Study of shear strength characteristics of simulation rock structural planes based on multi-size direct shear tests. Rock Soil Mech 34(11):3180–3186 ((In Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang M, Hong C, Du S, Luo Z (2020) Experimental technology for the shear strength of the series-scale rock joint model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:5677–5695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02241-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang M, Hong C, Ma C, Luo Z, Du S, Yang F (2020) A new representative sampling method for series size rock joint surfaces. Sci Rep 10(1):9129. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66047-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang M, Xia C, Ma C (2019) A progressive coverage statistical method for series scales three-dimensional morphology of rock joints. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 38(8):1533–1541 ((In Chinese))

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bahaaddini M, Hagan PC, Mitra R, Hebblewhite BK (2014) Scale effect on the shear behaviour of rock joints based on a numerical study. Eng Geol 181:212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang C (1997) Numerical simulation of progressive rock failure and associated seismicity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34(2):249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(96)00039-3

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang Z, Harrison JP (2002) Development of a local degradation approach to the modelling of brittle fracture in heterogeneous rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(4):443–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(02)00035-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cundall PA, Hart RD (1992) Numerical modelling of discontinua. Eng Comput 9(2):101–113. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb023851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhuang X, Chun J, Zhu H (2014) A comparative study on unfilled and filled crack propagation for rock-like brittle material. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 72(1):110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2014.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang W, Dai B, Liu Z, Zhou C (2016) Modeling discontinuous rock mass based on smoothed finite element method. Comput Geotech 79:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abdelaziz A, Zhao Q, Grasselli G (2018) Grain based modelling of rocks using the combined finite-discrete element method. Comput Geotech 103:73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bahaaddini M, Sharrock G, Hebblewhite BK (2013) Numerical direct shear tests to model the shear behaviour of rock joints. Comput Geotech 51:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang X, Yuan W, Yan Y, Zhang X (2020) Scale effect of mechanical properties of jointed rock mass: a numerical study based on particle flow code. Geomech Eng 21(3):259–268. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2020.21.3.259

  27. Wu N, Liang Z, Zhou J, Zhang Y (2020) Energy evolution characteristics of coal specimens with preformed holes under uniaxial compression. Geomech Eng 20(1):55–66. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2019.18.6.627

  28. Yan YT, Wang SW (2022) Simulation investigation of mechanical and failure characteristics of jointed rock with different shapes of joint asperities under compression loading. Comput Part Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-022-00477-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xie L, Jin P, Su TC, Li X, Liang Z (2019) Numerical simulation of uniaxial compression tests on layered rock specimens using the discrete element method. Comput Part Mech 7(4):753–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00307-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Potyondy DO (2015) The bonded-particle model as a tool for rock mechanics research and application: current trends and future directions. Geosyst Eng 18(1):1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2014.998346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Asadi M, Rasouli V, Barla G (2012) A bonded particle model simulation of shear strength and asperity degradation for rough rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45(5):649–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0231-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Itasca Consulting Group Inc. (2014) PFC (particle flow code), version 5.0. ICG, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A. http://www.itascacg.com/software/pfc

  33. Meng F, Song J, Yue Z, Zhou H, Wang X, Wang Z (2022) Failure mechanisms and damage evolution of hard rock joints under high stress: Insights from PFC2D modeling. Eng Anal Bound Elem 135:394–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.12.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3205002107D) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX20-0117).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Min.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, W., Min, M. Investigation on the scale dependence of shear mechanical behavior of rock joints using DEM simulation. Comp. Part. Mech. 10, 1613–1627 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00577-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00577-y

Keywords

Navigation