Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A hybrid method of peridynamic differential operator-based Eulerian particle method–immersed boundary method for fluid–structure interaction

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a non-local Eulerian particle method coupling with immersed boundary method (IBM) for fluid–structure interaction (FSI) problems. In the Eulerian particle method, the partial differential forms of governing equations are transformed into integral forms using peridynamic differential operator (PDDO). Symmetric particle distribution is applied in the Eulerian particle method, enhancing the efficiency and stability of the algorithm. By introducing the IBM framework into the original Eulerian particle method, we can obtain a new coupling method, which could solve problems with moving bodies inside fluid and extend the applicability of the Eulerian particle method. The numerical procedure of the proposed hybrid method is detailed. The proposed method is then applied to three benchmark problems: 2D flow around a steady rectangle/moving square and an impulsively started rigid plate inside a rectangular box filled with water. The results capture the flow characteristics of these problems, showing the proposed method's stability and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yao X, Zhang X, Huang D (2022) An improved SPH-FEM coupling approach for modeling fluid–structure interaction problems. Comput Part Mech 1–18

  2. Lee H, Song M, Suh J, Chang B (2014) Hydro-elastic analysis of marine propellers based on a BEM-FEM coupled FSI algorithm. Int J Nav Arch Ocean 6:562–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang H, Chen A, Kareem A, Hu L, Ma R (2022) Peridynamic differential operator-based Eulerian particle method for 2D internal flows. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 392:114568

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen CT, Oterkus S, Oterkus E, Amin I, Ozdemir M, El-Aassar A, Shawky H (2021) Modelling of Eulerian incompressible fluid flows by using peridynamic differential operator. Ocean Eng 239:109815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasar A, Rogers BD, Revell A, Stansby PK, Lind SJ (2019) Eulerian weakly compressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) with the immersed boundary method for thin slender bodies. J Fluid Struct 84:263–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lind SJ, Stansby PK (2016) High-order Eulerian incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics with transition to Lagrangian free-surface motion. J Comput Phys 326:290–311

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48:175–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Madenci E, Barut A, Futch M (2016) Peridynamic differential operator and its applications. Comput Method Appl Mech 304:408–451

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Bazazzadeh S, Shojaei A, Zaccariotto M, Galvanetto U (2018) Application of the peridynamic differential operator to the solution of sloshing problems in tanks. Eng comput 36:45–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Y, Oterkus S (2020) Multi-phase fluid flow simulation by using peridynamic differential operator. Ocean Eng 216:108081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao Y, Oterkus S (2019) Nonlocal numerical simulation of low Reynolds number laminar fluid motion by using peridynamic differential operator. Ocean Eng 179:135–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peskin CS (1972) Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10:252–271

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang M, Avital EJ, Bai X, Ji C, Xu D, Williams JJR, Munjiza A (2020) Fluid–structure interaction of flexible submerged vegetation stems and kinetic turbine blades. Comput Part Mech 7:839–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uhlmann M (2004) New results on the simulation of particulate flows, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas Medioambientales y Tecnologicas (CIEMAT)

  15. Li CW, Wang LL (2004) An immersed boundary finite difference method for LES of flow around bluff shapes. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 46:85–107

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Favier J, Revell A, Pinelli A (2014) A Lattice Boltzmann-Immersed Boundary method to simulate the fluid interaction with moving and slender flexible objects. J Comput Phys 261:145–161

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Posa A, Lippolis A, Verzicco R, Balaras E (2011) Large-eddy simulations in mixed-flow pumps using an immersed-boundary method. Comput Fluids 47:33–43

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Takeuchi T, Matsumoto M (1992) Aerodynamic response characteristics of rectangular cylinders in tandem arrangement. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 41:565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Su Y, Cui T, Yan D, Zhao J, Ju L (2012) The analysis of vertex street shedding from rectangle plate. J Wuhan Univ Technol 34:52–56+71

    Google Scholar 

  20. Breuer M, Bernsdorf J, Zeiser T, Durst F (2000) Accurate computations of the laminar flow past a square cylinder based on two different methods: lattice-Boltzmann and finite-volume. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 21:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cherfils JM, Blonce L, Pinon G, Rivoalen E (2010) IB-SPH simulations of wave-body interactions. In: 5th international SPHERIC workshop

  22. Koumoutsakos P, Shiels D (1996) Simulations of the viscous flow normal to an impulsively started and uniformly accelerated flat plate. J Fluid Mech 328:177–227

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundations of China [Grant Number 52238005], Shanghai Pujiang Program [Grant Number 22PJD079] and Shanghai Pujiang Program [Grant Number 21PJD077].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Bridge Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China

    Haocheng Chang, Airong Chen & Baixue Ge

Authors
  1. Haocheng Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Airong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Baixue Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Airong Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, H., Chen, A. & Ge, B. A hybrid method of peridynamic differential operator-based Eulerian particle method–immersed boundary method for fluid–structure interaction. Comp. Part. Mech. 10, 1309–1322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00562-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-023-00562-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation