Skip to main content
Log in

Discrete meta-analysis of slit dam intercepted particle flow based on PFC3D

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslides are a common geological hazard, and large-scale landslides can often impose a serious impact on the livelihoods of contemporary people. To study the effect of slit dams on debris flow, numerical simulations were hereby calibrated with fine parameters through physical tests, and several different sets of slit dam stopping structures were designed to study their effect on the accumulation of debris flow movement. The results showed that: (1) slit dams work effectively in reducing the velocity of particles in the x-direction, blocking 81.24% of the debris flow volume; (2) the time for the velocity of particles in the x-direction to drop to 0 m/s increases and fluctuates more with the increase of the slit dam column spacing, when the retention rate of the slit dam gradually decreases, and a clear linear relationship is found between the column spacing and the volumetric retention rate in the range of 0.02–0.06 m; (3) as the number of column rows increases, that of particles overflowing decreases gradually, and that of column rows has less influence on the changing pattern of the velocity of particle movement in the x-direction, when the volume interception rate of debris flow increases, but the increasing rate of interception rate is decreasing gradually; and (4) the staggered arrangement of slit dams has a more pronounced effect on the velocity hindrance of particle movement in the x-direction, with a blockage rate of 1.59%, which is effectively improved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig.6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pereira S, Zezere JL, Quaresma ID, Bateira C (2014) Landslide incidence in the North of Portugal: analysis of a historical landslide database based on press releases and technical reports. Geomorphology 214:514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.02.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang YZ, Nie L, Liu C, Zhang M, Xu Y, Teng YH et al (2021). Rainfall warning model for rainfall-triggered channelized debris flow based on physical model test-a case study of Laomao Mountain Debris Flow in Dalian City. Water 13(8): 1083. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13081083

  3. Xu C, Xu XW, Yu GH (2013) Landslides triggered by slipping-fault-generated earthquake on a plateau: an example of the 14 April 2010, Ms 7.1, Yushu, China earthquake. Landslides 10(4): 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0340-x

  4. Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2): 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-013-0436-y

  5. Zhang M, Yin YP, McSaveney M (2016) Dynamics of the 2008 earthquake-triggered Wenjiagou Creek rock avalanche, Qingping, Sichuan, China. Engineering Geology 200:75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.12.008

  6. Tan DY, Yin JH, Feng WQ, Feng WQ, Qin JQ, Chen WB (2014) New simple method for calculating impact force on flexible barrier considering partial muddy debris flow passing through. J Geotech Geo Environ Eng 145:9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wendeler C, Volkwein A (2014) Laboratory tests for the optimization of mesh size for flexible debris-flow barriers. Nat Hazard 15(12):2597–2604. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-15-2597-2015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao YC, Wei W, Jiang QH (2020) Simulation of movement of high-speed and long run-out landslide rock avalanche and the disaster reduction effects of retaining-wall based on the numerical manifold modelling. Adv Eng Sci 52(6):40–48

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chiaro G, Kiyota T, Pokhrel RM, Goda K, Katagiri T, Sharma K (2020) Reconnaissance report on geotechnical and structural damage caused by the 2015 Gorkha Earthquake. Nepal Soils Found 55(5):1030–1043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2015.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodwin SR, Choi CE (2020) Slit structures: fundamental mechanisms of mechanical trapping of granular flows. Comput Geotech 119:103376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang F, Chen X, Chen JG (2017) Experimental study on the energy dissipation characteristics of debris flow deceleration baffles. J Mt Sci 14(10):1951–1960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3868-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou GGD, Du JH, Song DR, Choi CE, Hu HS, Jiang Ch (2020) Numerical study of granular debris flow run-up against slit dams by discrete element method. Landslides 17(3):585–595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-019-01287-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang E, Bui HH, Nguyen GD, Choi CE, Ng CWW, De Sterck H et al (2021) Numerical investigation of the mechanism of granular flow impact on rigid control structures. Acta Geotech 16(8):2505–2527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01162-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cui YF, Choi CE, Liu LHD, Ng CWW (2018) Effects of particle size of mono-disperse granular flows impacting a rigid barrier. Nat Hazards 91(3):1179–1201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3185-3

  15. Leonardi A, Goodwin GR, Pirulli M (2019) The force exerted by granular flows on slit dams. Acta Geotech 14(6):1949–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00842-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng CWW, Choi CE, Song D, Kwan JHS, Koo RCH, Shiu HYK et al (2014) Physical modelling of baffles influence on landslide debris mobility. Landslides 12(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-014-0476-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi CE, Goodwin SR, Ng CWW, Cheung DHK, Kwan JSH, Pun WK (2016) Coarse granular flow interaction with slit structures. Geotechnique letters 6(4):267–274. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgele.16.00103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang Y, Zhang B, Zhu CQ (2020) Computational assessment of baffle performance against rapid granular flows. Landslides 18(1):485–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01511-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang NS, Lu HF, Xu JL, Guo XL, Liu HF (2020) Velocity profiles of granular flows down an inclined channel. Int J Multiph Flow 110:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2018.09.002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou GGD, Sun QC (2013) Three-dimensional numerical study on flow regimes of dry granular flows by DEM. Powder Technol 239:115–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.01.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gong SX, Zhao T, Zhao JD, Dai F, Zhou GGD (2021) Discrete element analysis of dry granular flow impact on slit dams. Landslides 18(3):1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-020-01531-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li B, Gong WP, Tang HM, Zou ZX, Bowa VM, Juang CH (2021) Probabilistic analysis of a discrete element modelling of the runout behavior of the Jiweishan landslide. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 45(8):1120–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.3199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Marchelli M, Leonardi A, Pirulli M, Scavia C (2020) On the efficiency of slit-check dams in retaining granular flows. Geotechnique 70(3):226–237. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeot.18.P.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang QZ, Pan Q, Chen Y, Luo ZJ, Shi ZM, Zhou YY (2019) Characteristics of landslide-debris flow accumulation in mountainous areas. Heliyon 5(9):e02463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pudasaini SP, Domnik B (2009) Energy considerations in accelerating rapid shear granular flows. Nonlinear Process Geophys 16(3):399–407. https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-16-399-2009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen YM (2019) Study of the motion mechanism and accumulation characteristics of non-cohesive particles based on model experiment and numerical simulation. Hefei University of Technology.

  28. Group I C (2008) PFC3D-particle flow code in three-dimensions. Minnesota.

  29. Drake TG (1990) Structural features in granular flows. J Geophys Res 95(B6):8681–8696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Drake TG (1991) Granular flow. physical experiments and their implications for micro-structural theories. J Fluid Mech 225:121–152

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou GGD, Hu HS, Song D, Zhao T, Chen XQ (2019) Experimental study on the regulation function of slit dam against debris flows. Landslides 16(1):75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1065-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, Y., Tang, L. & Sun, R. Discrete meta-analysis of slit dam intercepted particle flow based on PFC3D. Comp. Part. Mech. 10, 1127–1143 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-022-00542-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-022-00542-1

Keywords

Navigation