Skip to main content
Log in

Reaction force calculation for planetary sampling devices based on the predicted zone of influence

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Calculation of the reaction force is critical for the design of planetary sampling devices, and this paper discusses a new method based on the predicted zone of influence. According to accurate DEM simulations, the influence zone was defined from the calculation of the threshold particle displacement. To predict the influence zone, a back-propagation artificial neural network was trained with multiple simulated data. The reaction force can be calculated by computing the force along the external edge of the predicted influence zone. With consideration of the influence zone but without DEM simulation, this new method is accurate and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilkinson A, DeGennaro A (2007) Digging and pushing lunar regolith: classical soil mechanics and the forces needed for excavation and traction. J Terrramech 44(2):133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang L, Zhao Z, Zhao Y (2014) Prediction of lunar regolith excavation resistance and optimization of excavation parameters for minitype sampler. J Astronaut 35(1):39–46 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang T, Goldman DI (2014) The effectiveness of resistive force theory in granular locomotion. Phys Fluids 26(101308):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  4. Askari H, Kamrin K (2016) Intrusion rheology in grains and other flowable materials. Nat Mater 15:1274–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Craft J, Wilson J, Chu P, Zacny K, Davis K (2010) Percussive digging systems for planetary research. IEEE Aerosp Electron Syst Mag 25(10):21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Iai M, Gertsch L (2013) Excavation of lunar regolith with large grains by rippers for improved excavation efficiency. J Aerosp Eng 26(1):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green A, Zacny K, Pestana J, Lieu D, Mueller R (2013) Investigating the effects of percussion on excavation forces. J Aerosp Eng 26(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diaz Lankenau GF, Skonieczny K, Whittaker WL, Wettergreen DS (2012) Effect of bucket-wheel scale on excavation forces and soil motion. J Terrramech 49(6):341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Skonieczny K, Wettergreen DL, Whittaker WL (2016) Advantages of continuous excavation in lightweight planetary robotic operations. Intern J Robot Res 35(9):1121–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. King RH, Van Susante P, Gefreh MA (2011) Analytical models and laboratory measurements of the soil–tool interaction force to push a narrow tool through JSC-1A lunar simulant and Ottawa sand at different cutting depths. J Terrramech 48(1):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agui JH, Bucek M, DeGennaro A, Wilkinson RA, Zeng X (2013) Lunar excavation experiments in simulant soil test beds: revisiting the surveyor geotechnical data. J Aerosp Eng 26(1):117–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao Z (2014) Lunar surface sampling study on mechanical characteristics of tool-soil interaction. Ph.D. thesis, Jilin University (in Chinese)

  13. Boles WW, Scott WD, Connolly JF (1997) Excavation forces in reduced gravity environment. J Aerosp Eng 10(2):99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Green A, Zacny K (2014) Effect of Mars atmospheric pressure on percussive excavation forces. J Terrramech 51:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xue L, Chen B, Zhao Z, Dang Z, Zou M (2016) Experimental study of torque using a small scoop on the lunar surface. Intern J Aerosp Eng 2016:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hasan A, Alshibli KA (2010) Discrete element modeling of strength properties of Johnson Space Center (JSC-1A) lunar regolith simulant. J Aerosp Eng 23(3):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang M, Shen Z, Utili S (2016) DEM modeling of cantilever retaining excavations implications for lunar constructions. Eng Comput 33(2):366–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jiang M, Zheng M, Wang C (2012) Distinct element analysis of shear band of lunar soil in biaxial tests. Rock Soil Mech 12:3801–3809 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xi B, Jiang M, Dai Y, Shen Z (2014) DEM analyses of horizontal excavation in lunar soil. In: Conference of computational mechanics of granular materials (CMGM-2014), Lanzhou (in Chinese)

  20. Jiang M, Xi B, Shen Z, Dai Y (2015) DEM analyses of horizontal pushing resistance under different gravity fields. Chin J Geotech Eng 07:1300–1306 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang M, Xi B, Shen Z, Dai Y (2016) Discrete element numerical analysis of factors affecting horizontal pushing resistance in lunar ground excavation. Rock Soil Mech 37(1):229–236 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang M, Xi B, Shen Z, Dai Y (2016) DEM analyses of horizontal pushing test on lunar ground. Chin J Undergr Sp Eng 03:712–718 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li Q (2014) Research and application on surface sampling theoretical model based on lunar soil simulant. Ph.D. thesis, China University of Geosciences (in Chinese)

  24. Zheng Y, Ouyang Z, Wang S, Zou Y (2004) Physical and mechanical properties of lunar regolith. J Miner Pet 04:14–19 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kovanko BB, Luszuk HГ, Komis Sarczuk AA (2013) Lunar soil characteristics and development technology. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Matsushima T, Katagiri J, Uesugi K, Tsuchiyama A, Nakano T (2009) 3D shape characterization and image-based DEM simulation of the lunar soil simulant FJS-1. J Aerosp Eng 22(1):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Katagiri J, Matsushima T, Yamada Y, Tsuchiyama A, Nakano T, Uesugi K, Ohtake M, Saiki K (2015) Investigation of 3D grain shape characteristics of lunar soil retrieved in Apollo 16 using image-based discrete-element modeling. J Aerosp Eng 28:040140924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen Z, Zhou J, Wang H (2004) Soil Mechanics. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Professor Takashi Matsushima of the University of Tsukuba for DEM software, equipment and theoretical guidance during the research. This project was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11502034) and China Scholarship Council (No. 201608510014). Theoretical support from Chengdu University of Technology and the State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Qian.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, L., Matsushima, T., Lanlan, X. et al. Reaction force calculation for planetary sampling devices based on the predicted zone of influence. Comp. Part. Mech. 8, 1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00308-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00308-2

Keywords

Navigation