Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-implicit operator splitting for the simulation of Herschel–Bulkley flows with smoothed particle hydrodynamics

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) has become a popular numerical framework of choice for simulating free-surface flows, mainly for Newtonian fluids. The topic regarding the simulation of non-Newtonian free-surface flows, however, remains relatively untouched due to difficulties regarding the computation of viscous forces. In previous approaches, the viscous forces acting on each SPH particle were computed explicitly. Non-Newtonian fluids such as Herschel–Bulkley fluids, the effective viscosity between yielded and unyielded regions can differ by several orders of magnitudes; imposing severe time step restrictions for the simulation for explicit methods. Numerically, this can be seen as a stiff problem. We propose a semi-implicit time-stepping approach where the viscous forces are computed implicitly, within the context of SPH. We demonstrate the convergence of the method via a simple 2D test case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Marrone S, Molteni D (2010) Free-surface flows solved by means of SPH schemes with numerical diffusive terms. Comput Phys Commun 181(3):532–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.002

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bierbrauer F, Bollada P, Phillips T (2009) A consistent reflected image particle approach to the treatment of boundary conditions in smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(41–44):3400–3410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.06.014

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chorin AJ (1968) Numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Math Comput 22(104):745–762. https://doi.org/10.2307/2004575

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cleary PW (1998) Modelling confined multi-material heat and mass flows using SPH. Appl Math Model 22(12):981–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Colagrossi A, Landrini M (2003) Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 191:448–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferrás L, Nóbrega J, Pinho F (2012) Analytical solutions for newtonian and inelastic non-newtonian flows with wall slip. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 175:76–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hosseini S, Manzari M, Hannani S (2007) A fully explicit three-step SPH algorithm for simulation of non-newtonian fluid flow. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow 17(7):715–735

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu X, Adams N (2006) A multi-phase SPH method for macroscopic and mesoscopic flows. J Comput Phys 213(2):844–861

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu M, Liu G (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH): an overview and recent developments. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(1):25–76

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Macià F, Colagrossi A, Antuono M, Souto-Iglesias A (2011) Benefits of using a Wendland kernel for free-surface flows. In: 6th ERCOFTAC SPHERIC workshop on SPH applications, Hamburg University of Technology, pp 30–37

  11. Marrone S, Antuono M, Colagrossi A, Colicchio G, Le Touzé D, Graziani G (2011) Delta-SPH model for simulating violent impact flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200(13–16):1526–1542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.016

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Monaghan J, Kajtar J (2009) SPH particle boundary forces for arbitrary boundaries. Comput Phys Commun 180(10):1811–1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.008

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Monaghan JJ (1994) Simulating free surface flows with SPH. J Comput Phys 110(2):399–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oger G, Doring M, Alessandrini B, Ferrant P (2007) An improved SPH method: towards higher order convergence. J Comput Phys 225(2):1472–1492

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Shao S, Lo EY (2003) Incompressible SPH method for simulating newtonian and non-newtonian flows with a free surface. Adv Water Resour 26(7):787–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zohdi T (2007) Particle collision and adhesion under the influence of near-fields. J Mech Mater Struct 2(6):1011–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zohdi T (2010) On the dynamics of charged electromagnetic particulate jets. Arch Comput Methods Eng 17(2):109–135

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was not funded by any third party organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang Yoon Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that there was no conflicting interests of any type during the production of this research.

Ethical statement

No animals or humans participants were involved with any of the research, therefore informed consent was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, C.Y., Zohdi, T.I. Semi-implicit operator splitting for the simulation of Herschel–Bulkley flows with smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Comp. Part. Mech. 7, 699–704 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00301-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-019-00301-9

Keywords

Navigation