Implementation of an unresolved stabilised FEM–DEM model to solve immersed granular flows
- 134 Downloads
This paper presents an unresolved computational fluid dynamic–discrete element method (CFD–DEM) model for the simulation of flows mixing fluid and grains. The grains trajectories are solved at a fine scale using a discrete element method. It provides the velocities and the trajectories of the grains with an accuracy that is needed to describe microscopic phenomena like clogging in pipe happening in these flows. Solved at a coarse scale using the finite element method, the fluid motion is deduced from a mean continuous representation of the fluid phase giving computational performance and keeping variables evolutions that are of interest for a lot of simulation processes. The key point of this method lays in the coupling of the two different representation scales. An empirical drag formula for monodisperse granular media parametrises the transfer of momentum between the phases. Applying this model to the well-known problem of suspension drops provides validation and insight in this kind of methodology. Simulations in which inertia is non-negligible are achieved to prove the generality and adaptability of the unresolved CFD–DEM model compared to other models.
KeywordsMultiscale model Multiphase flow Suspension drops Finite element Discrete element Simulations
Matthieu Constant is a Research Fellow with the Belgium Fund for Research in Industry and Agriculture (FRIA).
This study was funded by the F.R.S.-FNRS through a FRIA Grant (29627518).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 14.Chu K, Wang B, Yu A, Vince A (2009) CFD–DEM modelling of multiphase flow in dense medium cyclones. Powder Technol 193(3):235–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.015 (Special issue: Discrete element methods: the 4th international conference on discrete element methodsthe 4th international conference on discrete element methods, Brisbane, August 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Chu K, Yu A (2008) Numerical simulation of complex particle-fluid flows. Powder Technol 179(3):104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2007.06.017 (WCPT5Papers presented at the 5th world conference of particle technology (WCPT5), Orlando, Florida, April 23–27 20065th world conference of particle technology (WCPT5))CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Ergun S (1952) Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem Eng Prog 48:89–94Google Scholar
- 26.Gupta P (2015) Verification and validation of a DEM-CFD model and multiscale modelling of cohesive fluidization regimes. Ph.D. thesis, The University of EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- 30.Hughes TJR, Franca LP (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumeventing the Babuska–Brezzi condition: a stable petrov-galerking formulation of the stokes problem accomodating equal-order interpolations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:85–99CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 33.Jean M, Moreau J (1992) Unilaterality and dry friction in the dynamics of rigid body collections. In: Proceedings of contact mechanics international symposium, vol 1, pp 31–48Google Scholar
- 36.Ladyshenskaya OA (1969) The mathematical theory of viscous incompressible flow. Gordon and Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 38.Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1987) Course of theoretical physics. In: Fluid mechanics, vol 6, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, pp. 336–343Google Scholar
- 50.Pritchett J, Blake T, Garg S (1978) A numerical model of gas fluidized beds. In: AIChE symposium series, vol 74, p 134Google Scholar
- 51.Renouf M, Dubois F, Alart P (2004) A parallel version of the non smooth contact dynamics algorithm applied to the simulation of granular media. J Comput Appl Math 168:375–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2003.05.019 (Selected papers from the second international conference on advanced computational methods in engineering (ACOMEN 2002))MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 53.Rzadkiewicz SA, Mariotti C, Heinrich P (1996) Modelling of submarines landslides and generated water waves. Phys Chem Earth 21(1–2):1–12Google Scholar
- 62.Wen CY, Yu HY (1966) Chemical engineering progress symposium series. Mech Fluid 62:100–111Google Scholar