# Optimal design of hybrid wind/photovoltaic electrolyzer for maximum hydrogen production using imperialist competitive algorithm

- 7.7k Downloads
- 4 Citations

## Abstract

The rising demand for high-density power storage systems such as hydrogen, combined with renewable power production systems, has led to the design of optimal power production and storage systems. In this study, a wind and photovoltaic (PV) hybrid electrolyzer system, which maximizes the hydrogen production for a diurnal operation of the system, is designed and simulated. The operation of the system is optimized using imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA). The objective of this optimization is to combine the PV array and wind turbine (WT) in a way that, for minimized average excess power generation, maximum hydrogen would be produced. Actual meteorological data of Miami is used for simulations. A framework of the advanced alkaline electrolyzer with the detailed electrochemical model is used. This optimal system comprises a PV module with a power of 7.9 kW and a WT module with a power of 11 kW. The rate of hydrogen production is 0.0192 mol/s; an average Faraday efficiency of 86.9 percent. The electrolyzer works with 53.7 percent of its nominal power. The availability of the wind for longer periods of time reflects the greater contribution of WT in comparison with PV towards the overall throughput of the system.

## Keywords

Electrolyzer Hydrogen Wind turbine Photovoltaic Imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA)## 1 Introduction

The demand for environmentally benign renewable power sources is increasing. Indeed, the trend is escalating the preference of power generation from renewable resources rather than from fossil fuels. Wind Turbines (WT) and Photovoltaic (PV) panels are the most desired types of such systems [1, 2, 3]. The power produced from PV is available during the day when solar irradiance is available to be exploited, and the power produced from WT is at the peak when the wind blows favorably to the blades. Hence, for increasing the reliability of the power generation, the combination of these two systems is a feasible proposition [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Moreover, typically, the irradiance and wind complement each other [12, 13, 14, 15]. Because the availability of irradiance and wind is not guaranteed, the inclusion of a storage system is important for improving the overall system reliability. Batteries are the most sought-after among the different hydrogen storage device technologies. However, because of their energy leakage between 1% and 5% per hour, and their low energy densities, they are not useful for long-term operation of power systems [16]. Hydrogen can be a good choice due to its high energy density, low energy loss, mature technology, on-site provision capability, and compactness [17, 18, 19, 20]. One of the most promising ways of producing hydrogen is through the electrolysis of water using an electrolyzer. Hydrogen can be used in almost every application that fossil fuels are being used currently. In addition, hydrogen can be more efficiently transformed into other forms of energy and is as reliable as the conventional fuels such as coal, nuclear and natural gas.

Recently, many researchers have investigated the combination of renewable power resources, especially wind and PV systems, for hydrogen production [21, 22, 23]. The so generated hydrogen can be used as a power supply to fuel cells, which are secondary power sources.

A hybrid system comprising four modules: WT, PV array, fuel cell and ultra-capacitor was simulated in [24]. Handling an off-grid load for a diurnal period was the primary focus of their proposed system. In [25], WT and PV were used as power generation sources to design a hydrogen production and storage system. However, this study employed components based on simple models, and the monthly performance of the system was evaluated without taking into account any optimization. A similar model was proposed in [26], which looks at the economic optimization of the hybrid system by expanding its features to include WT, PV array, fuel cell and electrolyzer, and achieves its goal to meet the grid-connected load using Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. An elaborate review of the various energy management strategies using a combination of WT, PV, fuel cells and batteries is provided by [27]. The ICA employed in [28] explores the optimization of WT-PV hybrid system for meeting an AC load. However, the surplus power produced is lost in a dump load.

In [29], a standalone system that generates hydrogen was evaluated against the three possible ways of using WT and PV systems. An optimal sizing of the standalone power system was also done considering the cost of the system components to be variable with respect to time. So, another index for optimization is used which is independent of time. The introduced index relies on maximum hydrogen production through minimum excess power production of resources. The detailed components of WT, PV array, power electronic devices, electrolyzer, and storage tank which were used for the purpose of simulation were explained in detail.

In this paper, optimal combination of PV and WT for hydrogen production and storage is discussed by considering the system operation on a typical day. Most of the existing research perform only cost-based optimization which ignores technical issues. The system and component costs, however, are time-variant. It is to be noted that when excess power and system dimensions are minimized, cost is indirectly reduced as well. Indirectly optimizing cost this way makes it reliable, since variation in the costs of components does not affect the optimization result. In this paper, Imperialistic Competitive Algorithm (ICA) is used to maximize hydrogen generation and minimize excess power production. Electromechanical and electrochemical component models are used for simulation, and system electrical characteristics are analyzed. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 discusses models and equations used for WT, PV, electric generator and electrolyzer. Section 3 provides a detailed description and pseudocode for the ICA. The flowchart of the proposed system is also documented. Section 4 provides the system setup, simulation analysis and results. Finally, Section 5 provides a brief conclusion.

## 2 Standalone power system models

### 2.1 WT module

*ρ*is the density of air;

*A*is the area of the space that the blades rotate in;

*V*is the wind speed and

*C*

_{ p }is the ratio of the extracted power to the incident power, which is called power coefficient, or rotor efficiency, and is derived from (2) and (3):

*β*is pitch angle and

*λ*is the ratio of the speed of the tip of the blade to the speed of the wind. Having computed the power, the output torque,

*T*, can be expressed by (4) and (5):

*ω*is the angular speed of generator shaft;

*J*is the moment of inertia of all its rotating parts, including the generator and turbine;

*D*is the damping torque coefficient;

*T*

_{ e }is the electrical torque;

*T*

_{ mech }is mechanical torque and the difference between them is representative of loss in torque of the generator and load. The power production from wind turbine might have transient control issues, which have been discussed in recent literature [35, 36].

### 2.2 PV module

*R*

_{ sh }) is assumed to be negligible for the simplicity of the model. In the absence of irradiance, the PV cells are not active and act like p-n junction diodes which do not produce any power or voltage. However, if it is installed with a connection to an external load with high voltage, it produces a current of

*I*

_{ L }. The considered model of the PV cell consists of a current source, a diode, and a series resistance which shows the internal resistance of the cells and the resistance of the connecting cells [37, 38, 39].

*I*

_{ L }and the diode current,

*I*

_{ D }. According to the simplified model shown in Fig. 3, the equation of the voltage and current can be derived from (6) shown below:

*I*

_{0}is the saturation current;

*I*

_{ L }is the light current;

*I*is the load current;

*U*is the output voltage;

*R*

_{ S }is the series resistance;

*α*is the voltage thermal coefficient.

*I*

_{0},

*I*

_{ L },

*R*

_{ S },

*α*, have to be determined in this model, it is called a “four parameters model”. A PV module consists of

*N*

_{ p }panels in parallel and

*N*

_{ s }panels in series for each branch. Table 1 shows the characteristics of the panels used in this study.

Electrical parameters of PV system [29]

Variable | | | | | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

Value | 17.2 V | 22.2 V | 1.324 Ω | 4.95 V | 5.45 V |

### 2.3 Electrolyzer

- 1)
Hydrogen and oxygen are ideal gases.

- 2)
Water is an incompressible fluid.

- 3)
The phases of liquid and gas are separate from each other.

*U*

_{ rev }is the activation voltage for this process;

*r*is Ohmic resistance parameter;

*s*and

*t*are the parameters of over voltages;

*T*is the temperature of the electrolyzer, and

*A*is the area of the electrodes.

Electrochemical parameters of alkaline electrolyzer [29]

Parameter | Amount |
---|---|

| 7.3 × 10 |

| −1.1 × 10 |

| −1.002 A |

| 8.424 A |

| 247.3 A |

| 1.6 × 1 |

| 1.38 × 10 |

| −1.6 × 10 |

| 0.25 m |

*f*

_{1}(mA

^{2}cm

^{−4}) and

*f*

_{2}are parameters of Faraday efficiency which are given in Table 3.

Parameters of Faraday efficiency [29]

Parameter | Value |
---|---|

| 250 mA |

| 0.96 |

*n*

_{ c }represents a stack of electrolyzers in series which, for a 10 kW electrolyzer, is equal to 21;

*F*is the Faraday constant equal to 96485 C/mol;

*z*is the number of electrons transformed in the process of electrolysis, equal to 2.

## 3 Imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA)

The ICA is predominantly used to find globally optimal solutions for a wide range of applications. As described in [44] and [45], this algorithm stemmed from the concept of imperialistic competition, which was employed originally used to solve continuous problems.

ICA optimization pseudocode

ICA optimization steps |
---|

a) Select random points on the function and initialize them |

b) Perform the assimilation process |

c) If there is a colony that has a lower cost than that of the imperialist, exchange their positions |

d) Annex the weakest colony of the weakest empire to the empire that has the most likelihood to possess it |

e) Eliminate the powerless empires |

f) Repeat steps a) through e) until there is just one empire left |

As described further in [46], this optimization algorithm belongs to the class of Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) and begins with a set of “countries” that can be analogous to the initial population in general. In the initial state, some of these countries are chosen to represent “imperialists” while the others become “colonies”. Each of this colony initially belongs to a specific imperialist. The power of an imperialist is inversely proportional to the cost, as is the case with fitness factor and cost in GA. Evolving from this initial setup, these colonies begin shifting towards their respective imperialistic countries [47].

The total power of an empire depends on both the power of the imperialist as well as its colonies. This forms the setup for further competition to happen between the different imperialists wherein each imperialist has the goal of maximizing the power by adding as many colonies as possible. Thus, in the process, those empires that lose all of their colonies to others collapse and are weeded out of the optimization problem. The strongest empire with the highest power and hence the least cost becomes the winner, more formally termed the “optimal solution”. In the final state, the colonies and imperialists will all have the same power.

*∆P*is excess power defined as the difference between the produced power by wind turbine and PV with electrolyzer nominal power when the produced power is more than nominal power of electrolyzer. It has been assumed that the excess power is available in the system and more than 15W. It should be mentioned that the system is optimized for the whole day. This step is calculated after assimilation and revolution of colonies, then the objective is calculated. It is considered that the system will definitely have excess power, because to reach the maximum average hydrogen production, electricity should reach the nominal power of electrolyzer. In this study, the cost of the system is not considered to be minimized because of instability during time. However, considering the minimization of excess power indirectly minimizes the cost. Fig. 8 shows the hydrogen production as a function of PV and WT size. As can be seen, the slope of production in high powers decreases because the produced power exceeds the nominal power of electrolyzer. So, the excess power minimization is a constraint for this optimization.

## 4 Simulation setup, results and discussion

Parameters of ICA

Parameter | Value |
---|---|

Population size | 250 |

Initial imperialists | 10% of population size |

Colonies | 225 |

Iterations | 120 |

Assimilation coefficient | 1.4 |

Revolution rate | 0.25 |

Angle coefficient | 0.4 |

Damp ratio | 0.8 |

Threshold | 0.01 |

The following observations have been made based on the working of the proposed system based on conducting preliminary simulation using MATLAB. In this study, the effect of ambient temperature to the operation point of the system is neglected.

Total Hydrogen production is shown in Fig. 11b as a function of time which is 1628 mol with an average rate of 0.0192 mol/s. The production is almost fixed after sunrise because the system attains maximum operation. During its operation, hydrogen is stored in high-pressure storage tanks capable of storing in 8.64 MPa. The loss and energy for the pressurizing the hydrogen is neglected.

The system voltage is shown in Fig. 11c, from which it can be inferred that the average operating voltage is 28V, which is almost fixed. This voltage is the operating voltage of PV, WT, and Electrolyzer regulated by converters. The small changes in voltage cause major changes in current because the electrolyzers are stacked in series and the electrolyzer is sensitive to voltage fluctuations. This trend of the changing in characteristics stems from the meteorological data used.

The Faraday efficiency is plotted in Fig. 11d, from which the average efficiency value can be estimated to be around 86.9%. When compared with the full-time operation of the electrolyzer with a Faraday efficiency of 93.7, it is 6.8% deficit. The Faraday efficiency remains nearly fixed despite an increase in the power. The variation of the efficiency at higher magnitudes of power does not have a significant effect on the overall operation of the proposed system. At low speeds, the real condition of hydrogen production is almost 50% of the theoretical condition and this is because the parasitic current disrupts the operation of the electrolyzer at lower values of power.

## 5 Conclusion

Results from the previous study have been extended in this paper to implement the developed simulation model for the optimal RE system with hydrogen production and storage. Its operation under efficient integration of WT and PV modules was investigated for the region of Miami based on the datasets obtained from the local utility with a resolution of 10 minutes. The geographic conditions prevalent in Miami region are also taken into consideration while implementing this model for assessing the results. A combination of power resources, creating a hybrid mode in essence, increases the efficiency of the overall system by delivering more power to the electrolyzer, and hence covers more area of the power curve of the device. In this scenario, it is also noteworthy that the power loss is minimized. Minimal loss of power occurs at noon when irradiance is maximum and at night when wind speeds maximize.

The effect of WT in production is 49.8% more than PV array in hybrid system. Although the contribution of PV array is less than WT in power production, because the maximum production of PV is at noon, when the wind speed is low, the hybrid system is more reliable than the systems with one power source. The estimated Faraday efficiency of this hybrid system is about 86.9%, which when compared with the full-time operation of the electrolyzer with an efficiency of 93.7%, puts it at just 6.8% lower. Although the contribution of PV module in the system is less than that of WT as far as power generation is concerned, owing to maximum production of PV at noon when the wind speed is low, the hybrid system is more reliable than those systems with just one power source.

## Notes

### Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation (No. 1553494). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

## References

- [1]Erdem ZB (2010) The contribution of renewable resources in meeting Turkey’s energy-related challenges. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 14(9):2710–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]Yang HX, Zhou W, Lou CZ (2009) Optimal design and techno-economic analysis of a hybrid solar-wind power generation system. Appl Energ 86(1):163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]Bertin A, Frangi JP (2013) Contribution to the study of the wind and solar radiation over Guadeloupe. Energ Conver Manag 75:593–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]Li CH, Zhu XJ, Cao GY et al (2009) Dynamic modeling and sizing optimization of stand-alone photovoltaic power systems using hybrid energy storage technology. Renew Energ 34(3):815–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]Hadjipaschalis I, Poullikkas A, Efthimiou V (2009) Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 13(6/7):1513–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]Zhang LF, Gari N, Hmurcik LV (2014) Energy management in a microgrid with distributed energy resources. Energ Conver Manag 78:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]You S, Hu JJ, Zong Y et al (2016) Value assessment of hydrogen-based electrical energy storage in view of electricity spot market. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energ 4(4):626–635. doi: 10.1007/s40565-016-0246-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]Khalilnejad A, Sundararajan A, Abbaspour A et al (2016) Optimal operation of combined photovoltaic electrolyzer systems. Energies 9(5):332–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]Khalilnejad A, Sundararajan A, Sarwat AI (2016) Performance evaluation of optimal photovoltaic-electrolyzer system with the purpose of maximum hydrogen storage. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE/IAS 52nd industrial and commercial power systems technical conference (I&CPS’16), Detroit, MI, USA, 1–5 May 2016, 9 ppGoogle Scholar
- [10]Nguyen THT, Nakayama T, Ishida M (2017) Optimal capacity design of battery and hydrogen system for the DC grid with photovoltaic power generation based on the rapid estimation of grid dependency. Int J Electr Power Energ Syst 89:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]Garcia P, Torreglosa JP, Fernandez LM et al (2013) Optimal energy management system for stand-alone wind turbine/photovoltaic/hydrogen/battery hybrid system with supervisory control based on fuzzy logic. Int J Hydrog Energ 38(33):14146–14158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Li J, Zhang XP (2016) Impact of increased wind power generation on subsynchronous resonance of turbine-generator units. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energ 4(2):219–228. doi: 10.1007/s40565-016-0192-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]Domijan A, Sarwat AI, Wilcox WS et al (2004) Modeling the effect of weather parameters on power distribution interruptions. In: Proceedings of the 7th IASTED international conference on power and energy systems, Clearwater Beach, Fl, USA, 28 Nov–1 Dec 2004, 448–130 ppGoogle Scholar
- [14]Bhattacharyya R, Misra A, Sandeep KC (2017) Photovoltaic solar energy conversion for hydrogen production by alkaline water electrolysis: conceptual design and analysis. Energ Convers Manag 133:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]Smaoui M, Abdelkafi A, Krichen L (2015) Optimal sizing of stand-alone photovoltaic/wind/hydrogen hybrid system supplying a desalination unit. J Solar Energ 120:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]Wichert B, Dymond M, Lawrance W, Friese T (2001) Development of a test facility for photovoltaic-diesel hybrid energy systems. Renew Energ 22(1–3):311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]Khalilnejad A, Abbaspour A, Sarwat AI (2016) Multi-level optimization approach for directly coupled photovoltaic-electrolyser system. Int J Hydrog Energ 41(28):11884–11894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]Castañeda M, Cano A, Jurado F et al (2013) Sizing optimization, dynamic modeling and energy management strategies of a stand-alone PV/ hydrogen/battery-based hybrid system. Int J Hydrog Energ 38(10):3830–3845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [19]Clarke RE, Giddey S, Ciacchi FT et al (2009) Direct coupling of an electrolyser to a solar PV system for generating hydrogen. Int J Hydrog Energ 34(6):2531–2542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]Pelacchi P, Poli D (2010) The influence of wind generation on power system reliability and the possible use of hydrogen storages. Electr Power Syst Res 80(3):249–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]Dutta S (2014) A review on production, storage of hydrogen and its utilization as an energy resource. J Ind Eng Chem 20(4):1148–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]Torreglosa JP, Garcia P, Fernandez LM et al (2015) Energy dispatching based on predictive controller of an off-grid wind, turbine/photovoltaic/hydrogen/battery hybrid system. Renew Energ 74:326–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]Brka A, Al-Abedli YM, Kothapalli G (2015) The interplay between renewables penetration, costing and emissions in the sizing of stand-alone hydrogen systems. Int J Hydrog Energ 40(1):125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]Onara OC, Uzunoglu M, Alama MS (2008) Modeling, control and simulation of an autonomous wind turbine/photovoltaic/fuel cell/ultra-capacitor hybrid power system. J Power Sour 185(2):1273–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]Sopian K, Ibrahim MZ, Dauda WRW et al (2009) Performance of a PV-wind hybrid system for hydrogen production. Renew Energ 34(8):1973–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [26]Kaviani AK, Riahy GH, Kouhsari SHM (2009) Optimal design of a reliable hydrogen-based stand-alone wind/PV generating system, considering component outages. Renew Energ 34(11):2380–2390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [27]Akyuza E, Oktay Z, Dincerb I (2012) Performance investigation of hydrogen production from a hybrid wind-PV system. Int J Hydrog Energ 37(21):16623–16630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [28]Etesami MH, Ardehali MM (2014) Newly developed enhanced imperialistic competitive algorithm for design optimization of an autonomous hybrid green power system. Appl Math Inform Sci 8(1):309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]Khalilnejad A, Riahy GH (2014) A hybrid wind-PV system performance investigation for the purpose of maximum hydrogen production and storage using advanced alkaline electrolyzer. Energ Convers Manag 80:398–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]Sørensen B (2000) Renewable energy: its physics, engineering, use, environmental impacts, economy and planning aspects, 3rd edn. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- [31]Bianchi FD, Battista HD, Mantz RJ (2007) Wind turbine control systems: principles, modelling and gain scheduling design. Springer-Verlag London Limited, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [32]Ren HB, Gao WJ (2010) A MILP model for integrated plan and evaluation of distributed energy systems. J Appl Energ 87(3):1001–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [33]Barote L, Marinescu C, Georgescu M (2009) VRB modeling for storage in stand-alone wind energy systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Bucharest PowerTech, Bucharest, Romania, 28 Jun–2 Jul 2009, 6 ppGoogle Scholar
- [34]Moghadasi A, Sarwat AI (2015) Optimal analysis of resistive superconducting fault current limiters applied to a variable speed wind turbine system. In: Proceedings of the 2015 annual IEEE Region 3 technical, professional, and student conference (SoutheastCon’15), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 9–12 Apr, 7 ppGoogle Scholar
- [35]Moghadasi AH, Islam A, Amini M (2014) LVRT capability assessment of FSIG-based wind turbine utilizing UPQC and SFCL. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Power and Energy Society general meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 27–31 Jul 2014, 5 ppGoogle Scholar
- [36]Moghadasi A, Sargolzaei A, Khalilnejad A et al (2016) Model predictive power control approach for three-phase single-stage grid-tied PV module-integrated converter. In: Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Industry Applications Society annual meeting, Portland, OR, USA, 2–6 Oct 2016, 6 ppGoogle Scholar
- [37]Lorenzo E, Araujo G, Cuevas A (1994) Solar electricity: engineering of photovoltaic systems. Earthscan Publications Ltd, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- [38]Zahedi A (2011) Maximizing solar PV energy penetration using energy storage technology. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 15(1):866–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [39]Abbaspour A, Khalilnejad A, Chen Z (2016) Robust adaptive neural network control for PEM fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energ 41(44):20385–20395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [40]Ulleberg Ø (2003) Modeling of advanced alkaline electrolyzers: a system simulation approach. Int J Hydrog Energ 28(1):21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [41]Zhou T, Francois B (2009) Modeling and control design of hydrogen production process or an active hydrogen/wind hybrid power system. Int J Hydrog Energ 34(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [42]Scamman D, Bustamante H, Hallett S et al (2014) Off-grid solar-hydrogen generation by passive electrolysis. Int J Hydrog Energ 39(35):19855–19868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [43]Athari MH, Ardehali MM (2016) Operational performance of energy storage as function of electricity prices for on-grid hybrid renewable energy system by optimized fuzzy logic controller. Renew Energ 85:890–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [44]Ganeshan IS, Manikandan VVS, Sundhar VR et al (2015) Regulated hydrogen production using solar powered electrolyser. Int J Hydrog Energ 41(24):10322–10326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [45]Zhang Y, Wang Y, Peng C (2009) Improved imperialist competitive algorithm for constrained optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2009 international forum on computer science-technology and Applications (IFCSTA’09), Vol 1. Chongqing, China, 25–27 Dec 2009, 204–207 ppGoogle Scholar
- [46]Hadidi A, Hadidi M, Nazari A (2013) A new design approach for shell-and-tube heat exchangers using imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) from economic point of view. Energ Convers Manag 67:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [47]Atashpaz-Gargari E, Lucas C (2007) Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Singapore, 25–28 Sept 2007, 4661–4667 ppGoogle Scholar

## Copyright information

**Open Access**This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.