Abstract
In this paper, a dual droop-frequency diving coordinated control strategy is proposed for electric vehicle (EV) applications, where the hybrid energy storage system (HESS) with supercapacitors and batteries is integrated to prolong the life time of storage elements. The dynamic power allocation between the supercapacitor and batteries are obtained through the voltage cascaded control, upon which the high and low frequency power fluctuation are absorbed by the supercapacitors and batteries respectively to fully exploit the advantages of the supercapacitors and batteries. Moreover, the power capacity is scaled up by connecting storage blocks in parallel. A dual droop control scheme for parallel-connected energy storage system and its operation principle is introduced on the aspect of current sharing characteristic and state-of-charging (SOC) management. After detailed analysis and formula derivation, the corresponding loop parameters are designed. Through this control method, the current sharing performance is ensured and each block makes the self-adaptive adjustment according to their SOC. Consequently, the load power can be shared effectively, which helps to avoid the over-charge/over-discharge operation and contributes to the life cycle of the energy storage system. Each module is autonomous controlled without the necessity of communication, which is easy, economic and effective to realize. Finally, the simulation and experimental results are exhibited to verify the effectiveness of the proposed control scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The energy storage system (ESS) plays a key role in deciding the electric vehicle’s performance and reliability [1–3]. Compared with the energy storage system solely structured by only batteries or supercapacitors, a hybrid energy storage system comprising both high power density and high energy density storage units, gains better performance, such as high power rating, high energy capacity, short response time, and extended the life cycle of the ESS [4–7]. Control, robustness, stability, efficiency, and optimization of HESS remain an essential research area [8]. How to reinforce the complementary advantages of batteries and supercapacitors, the current sharing and SOC management of battery are key issues that need to be considered [9–12].
Many studies have been done upon the dynamic power sharing between batteries and supercapacitors [13–15]. The main control objective is to achieve the dynamic allocation of high frequency power demands and low frequency power demands to the batteries and supercapacitors respectively. In [14], a piecewise linear relationship between the current of the battery and supercapacitor decides the power distribution. When the load power varies tremendously, the current of supercapacitor increases dramatically. As a result, the fluctuating power is mainly compensated by the supercapacitor with fast response. However, in the case of small variation of the load power, all the power is balanced by the battery, which leads to frequent charge and discharge cycles. This may do great harm to the battery and shorten its service life. To separate the responses in frequency between these two energy storages, the power demand are divided into low frequency and high frequency components in [15]. And through the bus and supercapacitor voltage cascaded control, the converter current references are set such that the low frequency component is supplied by the battery and the high frequency component is supplied by the supercapacitor [16]. However, only one battery and one supercapacitor are concerned, which limits its applications in the high power occasion.
In [16–21], the total current demand is derived from the difference between the energy source and load power. Then the low-frequency component of the current, namely the total current reference for the battery interfacing power converters, is generated by passing this current reference through a low-pass filter (LPF), while the rest of the current is the reference for supercapacitors. However, the calculation of the total current demand requires the information of all energy source and load power. It relies on a wide communication bandwidth with the increasing number of interfaces, which decreases the system reliability. Meanwhile, the average current control is adopted for current sharing. Such centralized energy management system relies heavily upon the energy control center itself, resulting in inadequate system reliability and scalability, which is not suitable for systems with dynamic structure.
On the other hand, the batteries have the operation limitations in practice. Without a proper battery management, it may come into being serious problems, such as the over-charging, over-discharging, imbalance of voltage among the cells. Therefore, it is a necessity to develop advanced control strategies for the battery equalization. In [16, 18–22], SOC is taken into account in energy control center with centralized control, whose drawback is the less flexible and not appropriate in an expandable system. An attenuation coefficient, with consideration of factors like battery terminal voltage and SOC, is multiplied by the battery current reference in the control loop to guarantee the efficient and safe operation of batteries in [23]. However, the current reference restriction that no power outputs once the battery voltage exceeds the bounds is too rigorous.
Combined with advantages of the conventional droop control, which features high expandability and reliability, the dual droop frequency dividing coordinated control is derived for HESS in this paper with consideration of power sharing between batteries and supercapacitors and SOC of batteries. By employing this control scheme, the dynamic power sharing between two energy storage mediums is ensured with the DC bus and supercapacitor voltage cascaded control. While dual droop control, as an extension of the conventional droop control, realizes the current sharing and SOC management of different power modules without requirement of communication, which increases the system reliability and flexibility.
2 Proposed control strategy for HESS
Figure 1 shows an electric vehicle propulsion system with HESS, which contains both high energy density and high power density storage elements. The battery packs, which provide power during the intermittent of the renewable energy sources, are connected to the DC bus by modular bi-directional DC-DC converters for the convenience of battery capacity expansion. While the supercapacitors are connected to the DC bus by multiple converters because of the high power rating.
The detailed control block of HESS is depicted in Fig. 2. C Bus is the bus capacitor, and the power fluctuation caused by the motor drive is presented by a current source i bus . For controlling the bi-directional DC/DC converters (BDCs), a cascaded control scheme using the inner current-control loop and outer voltage-control loop is realized, where i L_ref is the current reference and the current transfer function is defined as G BDC (s). i Bat , i SC are the currents of the batteries and supercapacitors, respectively. i Bus_Bat , i Bus_SC are the corresponding current into the DC bus. G vcSC (s), H vBus , V Bus_ref are the compensators, feedback coefficient and voltage reference of the DC bus voltage control loop. The corresponding definitions of supercapacitor voltage control loop are expressed as G vcBat (s), H vSC , V SC_ref . And V Bus , V SC , V Bat are the voltage of DC Bus, supercapacitor and battery. The conventional droop control is employed to realize the current sharing among the BDCs for supercapacitor, and the dual droop control is adopted for the current sharing and SOC management of the batteries. The frequency diving control method is realized through the DC bus and supercapacitor voltage cascaded control.
To analyze and verify the effectiveness of the control strategy, a HESS, with the combination of batteries and supercapacitor, is built with parameters listed in Table 1.
2.1 Control design of power modules for supercapacitor
A DC-DC converter with droop controller can be simplified as an electric circuit with an ideal DC voltage source in series with an output resistance, as in Fig. 3. One promising way to realize droop control is by setting the virtual output impedance R droop of DC-DC converter. A schematic diagram of two parallel connected converter modules and the corresponding droop curves are depicted in Fig. 3. The difference of output currents ΔI Bus can be derived as
where V Bat1 and V Bat2 are the no-load voltage of each module.
As presented in [19], the input current reference i SC_ref for the supercapacitor converter is used to regulate the output voltage (V Bus ) at the reference level. From Fig. 4, the virtual output impedance of the supercapacitor converter is obtained by
In order to realize the V-I droop curves as shown in Fig. 3, the compensator G vcSC (s) can be derived as
Hence the output impedance Z BDC (s) equals to R d_SC .
Considering n converter modules in parallel, the open loop transfer function of DC bus voltage G vBuspoc (s) is n times of G vBusoc (s), which is given by
From (4), the bandwidth of DC bus voltage loop is decided by the number of branches in parallel n and the droop coefficient R d_SC . The bandwidth of DC bus voltage loop is set at 5 Hz with consideration of the supercapacitor response time (in milliseconds). In the case of two converter modules in parallel, the droop coefficient R d_SC is 21.2 Ω. If the voltage difference between V Bat1 and V Bat2 after calibration is 0.2% of the output voltage, namely 1.6 V, the difference of output current ΔI Bus can be obtained by (1), which is 0.075 A and 4% of current in full load case. So the effect in distributing current equally is satisfied.
The open and close loop transfer function after compensation G vBuspoc (s), G vBuspc (s) are obtained by (5) and (6), while the current transfer function from battery to supercapacitor G iSC_iBatp (s) is given by (7).
where z c_Bus equals to n/(R d_SC C Bus ).
2.2 Control design of power modules for batteries
The equation of droop control for batteries is listed as (8), where V SC0 is the no-load voltage of each module, R d_Bat is the drop coefficient and I Bat is the battery current. If all the battery converters are controlled under the same droop curve, the batteries with lower SOC will go into over discharge while those with higher SOC will be over charged, which significantly decrease the system reliability. In order to balance SOC of each battery unit, a dual droop control scheme is proposed by introducing battery SOC into droop control scheme, which is shown in Fig. 5.
V SC0_1, V SC0_2 are the supercapacitor voltage reference for each battery converter, which are decided with their SOCs as in (9)
where \( V_{SC0}^{ *} \) is the supercapacitor voltage reference under the circumstance of the minimum SOC and k v_SOC is the secondary droop coefficient.
Equation (9) is drawn in Fig. 6, which achieves droop curves shifting up and down as presented in Fig. 5. Thus the battery with higher SOC takes in smaller current and gives out bigger current, which contributes to SOC balancing among the battery units.
The difference of battery currents ΔI Bat is derived by
By substituting (11) into (12), ΔI Bat is expressed as
The battery SOC is related to its initial SOC, i.e. SOC 0 and the battery current as given by
So the difference of SOCs can be calculated as following
Carrying out Laplace transform on (12) and (14), (15) and (16) can be derived
By substituting (15) into (16), the difference of SOCs and battery currents are expressed as
According to (17), the SOC balance is a first order system so the difference of SOCs gradually deceases to zero with some decay time constant T SOC as given in (19). Consequently the difference of battery currents turns to zero, realizing the SOC balancing as demonstrated in (18).
3 Design considerations of proposed control strategy
3.1 Primary droop control parameter design
The block diagram of the supercapacitor voltage control loop is depicted in Fig. 7, where the supercapacitor is modeled as a capacitor C SC and a resistor R SC in series. And the impedance of the supercapacitor Z SC (s) = (R SC C SC s+1)/(C SC s). The relationship between the supercapacitor voltage and the battery current can be derived by
In order to lower the gain around zero introduced by the supercapacitor impedance so as to suppress the batteries’ response to the power fluctuation around the zero frequency, the compensator G vcBat (s) is designed as (20) where z SC = 1/(R SC C SC ) and the droop equation is derived by (22).
For the DC component, namely s = 0, the droop equation is simplified as following
The bandwidth of the supercapacitor voltage loop is set at 0.05 Hz considering the batteries response time (in seconds). In the case of two converter modules in parallel, the droop coefficient R d_SC is 0.05 Ω.
3.2 Secondary droop control parameter design
The secondary droop control between the supercapacitor voltage reference and SOC is achieved by adding a feedforward loop into the supercapacitor voltage control loop, as presented in Fig. 8. The secondary droop equation in steady state is given by
In order not to influence the stability of the supercapacitor voltage control loop, the SOC balancing time constant T SOC is set as 300 s, far larger than the corresponding time of the cross-over frequency in the supercapacitor voltage control loop (20 s). From (19), the secondary droop coefficient k v_SOC can be obtained.
3.3 System response to power fluctuation
The relationship between the control parameters and frequency response range is analyzed to theoretically verify the proposed control strategy.
The transfer block diagram of response of the supercapacitor current and battery current to power fluctuation is plotted in Fig. 9.
The transfer function from the supercapacitor current to the battery current is obtained by
where z c_SC is the crossover frequency of supercapacitor voltage control loop.
From Fig. 9, the output impedance of HESS can be calculated by
Therefore, the transfer function of the DC bus capacitor current, supercapacitor current and batteries current to power fluctuation G iCBus_ibusp (s), G iBus_SC_ibusp (s) and G iBus_Bat_ibusp (s) can be derived by
Figure 10 gives the frequency response range of the DC bus capacitors, supercapacitors and batteries to the power fluctuation. It can be seen that the batteries absorb the low frequency power fluctuation while supercapacitors provide the high frequency part and the rest power is supplied by DC bus capacitors. Meanwhile, the diving frequencies are decided by the crossover frequencies of the DC bus voltage control loop and supercapacitor voltage control loop. So the HESS can be fully used through proper controller design.
4 Experimental and simulation verification
In this section, a HESS, comprising two supercapacitor converters and two battery converters with parameters as listed in Table 1, is built to demonstrate the advanced performance of the proposed control strategy.
The current sharing effect and droop character of two supercapacitor converters are displayed in Fig. 11. The no-load voltage difference before and after calibration are shown in Fig. 11a, b respectively. And the droop curve and current difference are demonstrated in Fig. 11c, which presents a good current sharing result.
The process of SOC balancing and current equalization of batteries is shown in Fig. 12. The initial SOC difference is set to 5% and the measurement of SOC difference is calculated by the Ah-integration as presented in (14). With dual control scheme, the currents of battery units tends to equality and the SOC difference decreases gradually from the initial value 5% to 1.8% in 300 s, which is corresponding to the time constant T SOC .
Figure 13 shows the dynamic power allocation between supercapacitor and batteries when a 1 kW step load is applied to the system. The supercapacitor responses to the high frequency power fluctuation while the batteries response to the rest power. The output voltage is well regulated at DC bus voltage reference without steady state error since the supercapacitor does not response to the dc component. Meanwhile, it can be seen that the current difference in the case of ΔSOC = 3% is larger than that in the case of ΔSOC = 1.4%. So the current difference is positively correlated to ΔSOC, which helps to SOC equalization.
5 Conclusion
This paper proposes a dual droop-frequency diving coordinated control strategy for HESS in electric vehicle application. The dynamic power allocation is realized through the voltage cascaded control, where the DC bus voltage control loop and supercapacitor voltage control loop set the frequency range for both supercapacitor and battery, make the most use of hybrid energy storage system. On the other aspect, the dual droop control scheme provides not only current sharing between battery units but also SOC equalization without the necessity of communication, which helps to lengthen the battery cycle life and increase the system reliability and flexibility. The experimental results have proven it to be a viable solution for energy management of HESS.
References
Cao J, Emadi A (2012) A new battery/ultracapacitor hybrid energy storage system for electric, hybrid, and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(1):122–132
Napoli AD, Crescimbini F, Capponi FG et al (2002) Control strategy for multiple input DC-DC power converters devoted to hybrid vehicle propulsion systems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics, L’Aquila, 8–11 July 2002, pp 1036–1041
Zhang SQ, Mishra Y, Ledwich G et al (2013) The operating schedule for battery energy storage companies in electricity market. J Mod Power Syst Clean Energy 1(3):275–284
Venet LP, Guermazi A, Troudi A (2013) Battery/supercapacitors combination in uninterruptible power supply (UPS). IEEE Trans Power Electron 28(4):1509–1522
Zandi M, Payman A, Martin JP et al (2011) Energy management of a fuel cell/supercapacitor/battery power source for electric vehicular applications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 60(2):433–443
Mendis N, Muttaqi KM, Perera S (2014) Management of battery-supercapacitor hybrid energy storage and synchronous condenser for isolated operation of PMSG based variable-speed wind turbine generating systems. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 5(2):944–953
Wang L, Li H (2010) Maximum fuel economy-oriented power management design for a fuel cell vehicle using battery and ultracapacitor. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 46(3):1011–1020
Thounthong P, Pierfederici S, Martin JP et al (2010) Modeling and control of fuel cell/supercapacitor hybrid source based on differential flatness control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 59(6):2700–2710
Camara MB, Dakyo B, Gualous H (2012) Polynomial control method of DC/DC converters for DC-Bus voltage and currents management—battery and supercapacitors. IEEE Trans Power Electron 27(3):1455–1467
Lukic SM, Wirasingha SG, Rodriguez F et al (2006) Power management of an ultra-capacitor/battery hybrid energy storage system in an HEV. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Windsor, 6–8 Sep 2006, pp 1–6
Jiang W, Fahimi B (2010) Active current sharing and source management in fuel cell-battery hybrid power system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 57(2):752–761
Wang GS, Ciobotaru M, Agelidis VG (2013) Power management of hybrid energy storage system for a MW photovoltaic system. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE industrial electronics society Conference, Vienna, 10–13 Nov 2013, pp 6777–6782
Mendis N, Muttaqi KM, Perera S (2014) Management of low- and high-frequency power components in demand-generation fluctuations of a DFIG-based wind-dominated RAPS system using hybrid energy storage. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 50(3):2558–2568
Zhang Y, Jiang ZH (2009) Dynamic power sharing strategy for active hybrid energy storage systems. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE vehicle power and propulsion conference, Dearborn, Michigan, 7–11 Sep 2009, pp 558–563
Garcia FS, Ferreira AA, Pomilio JA (2009) Control strategy for battery-ultracapacitor hybrid energy storage system. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE applied power electronics conference and exposition, Washington, DC, 15–19 Feb, pp 826–832
Zhou HH, Bhattacharya T, Tran D et al (2011) Composite energy storage system involving battery and ultracapacitor with dynamic energy management in microgrid applications. IEEE Trans Power Electron 26(3):923–930
Abbey C, Strunz K, Joós G (2009) A knowledge-based approach for control of two-level energy storage for wind energy systems. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 24(4):539–547
Tani A, Camara MB, Dakyo B (2012) Energy management based on frequency approach for hybrid electric vehicle applications: fuel cell/Lithium-battery and ultracapacitors. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 61(8):3375–3386
Schaltz E, Khaligh A, Rasmussen PO (2009) Influence of battery/ultracapacitor energy-storage sizing on battery lifetime in a fuel cell hybrid electric vehicle. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 58(8):3882–3891
Wang GS, Ciobotaru M, Agelidis VG (2014) Power smoothing of large solar pv plant using hybrid energy storage. IEEE Trans Sustain Energy 5(3):834–842
Yoo H, Sul SK, Park Y et al (2008) System integration and power-flow management for a series hybrid electric vehicle using supercapacitors and batterie. IEEE Trans Appl 44(1):108–114
Dragicevic T, Guerrero JM, Vasquez JC et al (2014) Supervisory control of an adaptive-droop regulated DC microgrid with battery management capability. IEEE Trans Power Electron 29(2):695–706
Chen Z, Ding M, Su JH (2011) Modeling and control for large capacity battery energy storage system. In: Proceeding of the 2011 IEEE electric utility deregulation and restructuring and power technologies, Weihai, 6–9 July 2011, pp 1429–1436
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
CrossCheck date: 27 February 2015
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
LI, W., XU, C., YU, H. et al. Energy management with dual droop plus frequency dividing coordinated control strategy for electric vehicle applications. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 3, 212–220 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-015-0123-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-015-0123-1