Abstract
Virtual tourism has great potential for the tourism industry, but physical limitations in sensory experience and the possibility of symbolic images may impact authenticity and the feeling of freedom for tourists. We conduct a study to investigate how vividness, interactivity and autonomy affect tourists’ behavioral intention through the sense of presence and telepresence. Findings indicate that vividness and interactivity have a positive impact on tourists’ behavioral intention by the mediation of sense of presence and telepresence. Moreover, the results further demonstrate that autonomy exerts a significant impact exclusively on the sense of presence, without affecting telepresence. This study suggests that virtual tour developers should prioritize creating high-quality intermediary experiences by enhancing sensory dimensions and human-machine interaction. Meanwhile, respecting tourists’ autonomy and utilizing emerging technologies to enhance the overall enjoyment of the experience is also imperative.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atzeni M, Del Chiappa G, Mei Pung J (2022) Enhancing visit intention in heritage tourism: the role of object-based and existential authenticity in non-immersive virtual reality heritage experiences. Int J Tourism Res 24(2):240–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2497
Beck J, Rainoldi M, Egger R (2019) Virtual reality in tourism: a state-of-the-art review. Tourism Rev 74(3):586–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-03-2017-0049
Bennett D, Metatla O, Roudaut A, Mekler E (2023) How does HCI understand human autonomy and agency? In: Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580651
Cheng L-K, Huang H-L (2022) Virtual tourism atmospheres: the effects of pleasure, arousal, and dominance on the acceptance of virtual tourism. J Hospitality Tourism Manage 53:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.10.002
Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol 22(14):1111–1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x
Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. J Res Pers 19(2):109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Dueholm J, Smed KM (2014) Heritage authenticities–a case study of authenticity perceptions at a Danish heritage site. J Herit Tourism 9(4):285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2014.905582
Dybsand HNH (2022) The next best thing to being there’–participant perceptions of virtual guided tours offered during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Issues Tourism 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2122417
Fineschi A, Pozzebon A (2015) A 3D virtual tour of the Santa Maria Della Scala Museum Complex in Siena, Italy, based on the use of Oculus Rift HMD. In: 2015 International Conference on 3D Imaging (IC3D), pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3D.2015.7391825
Fuller CM, Simmering MJ, Atinc G, Atinc Y, Babin BJ (2016) Common methods variance detection in business research. J Bus Res 69(8):3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
Gao BW, Zhu C, Song H, Dempsey IMB (2022) Interpreting the perceptions of authenticity in virtual reality tourism through postmodernist approach. Inform Technol Tourism 24(1):31–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-022-00221-0
Guttentag DA (2010) Virtual reality: applications and implications for tourism. Tour Manag 31(5):637–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003
Heater C (1992) Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence-Teleoperators Virtual Environ 1(2):262–271. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262
Huang Y-C, Backman KF, Backman SJ, Chang LL (2016) Exploring the implications of virtual reality technology in tourism marketing: an integrated research framework. Int J Tourism Res 18(2):116–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2038
Huang Y-C, Backman SJ, Backman KF, McGuire FA, Moore D (2018) An investigation of motivation and experience in virtual learning environments: a self-determination theory. Educ Inform Technol 24(1):591–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9784-5
Jang Y, Park E (2019) An adoption model for virtual reality games: the roles of presence and enjoyment. Telematics Inform 42:101239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101239
Kim MJ, Hall CM (2019) A hedonic motivation model in virtual reality tourism: comparing visitors and non-visitors. Int J Inf Manag 46:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.016
Kim MJ, Lee C-K, Jung T (2020a) Exploring consumer behavior in virtual reality tourism using an extended stimulus-organism-response model. J Travel Res 59(1):69–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518818915
Kim MJ, Lee C-K, Preis MW (2020b) The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective well-being, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: the moderating role of technology readiness. Telematics Inform 49:101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101349
Kim J-H, Kim M, Park M, Yoo J (2021) How interactivity and vividness influence consumer virtual reality shopping experience: the mediating role of telepresence. J Res Interact Mark 15(3):502–525. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-07-2020-0148
Kim H, So KKF, Mihalik BJ, Lopes AP (2021a) Millennials’ virtual reality experiences pre-and post-COVID-19. J Hospitality Tourism Manage 48:200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.06.008
Kim J-H, Kim M, Park M, Yoo J (2023) Immersive interactive technologies and virtual shopping experiences: differences in consumer perceptions between augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR). Telematics Inform 77:101936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101936
Lee KM (2004) Presence, explicated. Communication Theory 14(1):27–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x
Lee M, Lee SA, Jeong M, Oh H (2020) Quality of virtual reality and its impacts on behavioral intention. Int J Hospitality Manage 90:102595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102595
Leotta A, Ross M (2018) Touring the ‘World Picture’: virtual reality and the tourist gaze. Stud Documentary Film 12(2):150–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2018.1503859
Li T, Chen Y (2019) Will virtual reality be a double-edged sword? Exploring the moderation effects of the expected enjoyment of a destination on travel intention. J Destination Mark Manage 12:15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.02.003
Li Y, Liang J, Huang J, Yang M, Li R, Bai H (2022) Would you accept virtual tourism? The impact of COVID-19 risk perception on technology acceptance from a comparative perspective. Sustainability 14(19):12693. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912693
Lo WH, Cheng KLB (2020) Does virtual reality attract visitors? The mediating effect of presence on consumer response in virtual reality tourism advertising. Inform Technol Tourism 22(4):537–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00190-2
Loureiro SMC, Guerreiro J, Ali F (2020) 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: a text-mining approach. Tour Manag 77:104028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104028
Lunardo R, Ponsignon F (2019) Achieving immersion in the tourism experience: the role of autonomy, temporal dissociation, and reactance. J Travel Res 59(7):1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519878509
Lyu J, Leung X, Bai B, Stafford M (2021) Hotel virtual reality advertising: a presence-mediated model and gender effects. J Hospitality Tourism Technol 12(3):409–422. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-04-2020-0080
Minsky M (1980) Telepresence. https://web.media.mit.edu/~minsky/papers/Telepresence.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2023
Mura P, Tavakoli R, Pahlevan Sharif S (2017) Authentic but not too much’: exploring perceptions of authenticity of virtual tourism. Inform Technol Tourism 17(2):145–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-016-0059-y
Mütterlein J (2018) The three pillars of virtual reality? Investigating the roles of immersion, presence, and interactivity. In: Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1407–1415. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/50061
Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Pratisto EH, Thompson N, Potdar V (2022) Immersive technologies for tourism: a systematic review. Inform Technol Tourism 24(2):181–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-022-00228-7
Rahimizhian S, Ozturen A, Ilkan M (2020) Emerging realm of 360-degree technology to promote tourism destination. Technol Soc 63:101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101411
Reer F, Wehden L-O, Janzik R, Tang WY, Quandt T (2022) Virtual reality technology and game enjoyment: the contributions of natural mapping and need satisfaction. Comput Hum Behav 132:107242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107242
Research and Markets (2022) Virtual tour market share, size, trends, industry analysis report, by product type; by device type; by application; by region; segment forecast, 2022–2030. https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/5707150/virtual-tour-market-share-size-trends#src-pos-2. Accessed 16 Apr 2023
Schiopu AF, Hornoiu RI, Padurean MA, Nica A-M (2021) Virus tinged? Exploring the facets of virtual reality use in tourism as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Telematics Inform 60:101575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101575
Schiopu AF, Hornoiu RI, Padurean AM, Nica A-M (2022) Constrained and virtually traveling? Exploring the effect of travel constraints on intention to use virtual reality in tourism. Technol Soc 71:102091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102091
Slater M, Sanchez-Vives MV (2016) Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front Rob AI 3:74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074
Slater M, Usoh M, Steed A (1994) Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence-Teleoperators Virtual Environ 3(2):130–144. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1994.3.2.130
Stankov U, Gretzel U (2020) Tourism 4.0 technologies and tourist experiences: a human-centered design perspective. Inform Technol Tourism 22(3):477–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-020-00186-y
Statista (2022) Market size of the virtual tourism industry worldwide in 2021, with a forecast for 2027. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1312254/virtual-tourism-market-size-worldwide/. Accessed 16 Apr 2023
Steuer J (1992) Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. J Communication 42(4):73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
Tussyadiah IP, Wang D, Jung TH, Dieck MC (2018) Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: empirical evidence from tourism. Tour Manag 66:140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003
UNWTO (2022) From Crisis to Transformation: Facing up to the crisis. https://www.unwto.org/reports/from-crisis-to-transformation/from-crisis-to-transformation.html. Accessed 16 Apr 2023
Urry J (1992) The tourist gaze revisited. Am Behav Sci 36(2):172–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764292036002005
Wu X, Lai IKW (2021) The use of 360-degree virtual tours to promote mountain walking tourism: stimulus–organism–response model. Inform Technol Tourism 24(1):85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-021-00218-1
Yang T, Lai IKW, Fan ZB, Mo QM (2021) The impact of a 360 degrees virtual tour on the reduction of psychological stress caused by COVID-19. Technol Soc 64:101514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101514
Yung R, Khoo-Lattimore C (2017) New realities: a systematic literature review on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism research. Curr Issues Tourism 22(17):2056–2081. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2017.1417359
Zhu C, Fong LHN, Gan M (2022) Rethinking the consequences of postmodern authenticity: the case of a world cultural heritage in augmented reality. Curr Issues Tourism 26(4):617–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2033181
Zhu C, Fong LHN, Gao H, Liu CYN (2023) When TikTok meets celebrity: an investigation of how celebrity attachment influences visit intention. Curr Issues Tourism 26(17):2762–2776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2022.2097058
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 21BGL125).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no known conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, G., Tian, B. Investigating the impact of autonomy on presence: a comparative analysis on sense of presence and telepresence. Inf Technol Tourism (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-024-00285-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-024-00285-0