Advertisement

Information Technology & Tourism

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 17–47 | Cite as

An integrative framework for extending the boundaries of the museum visit experience: linking the pre, during and post visit phases

  • Tsvi KuflikEmail author
  • Alan J. Wecker
  • Joel Lanir
  • Oliviero Stock
Original Research

Abstract

The Cultural Heritage experience at the museum begins before the actual on-site visit and continues with memories and reflections after the visit. In considering the potential of novel information and communication technology to enhance the entire visit experience, one scenario envisioned is extending the on-site visit boundaries, to help the visitors access information concerning exhibits that are of primary interest to them during pre-visit planning, provide relevant information to the visitors during the visit, and follow up with post visit memories and reflections. All this can be done by using today’s state of the art mobile and web-based applications, as well as any new foreseeable emerging technology. So far, research on applying novel information and communication technology in the cultural heritage domain has focused primarily on exploring specific aspects of the technology and its capability for supporting the individual visitor mainly during the physical, on-site, visit (and in some cases in additional specific phases such as prior or after the visit). This paper suggests a novel, integrative framework for supporting the pre, during and post visit phases in a personalized manner. It is based on a set of standard, common models: a visitor model, a site model and a visit model, all enable a large variety of services to store, update and reuse data during the three phases of the visit. Our contribution is presenting a framework architecture with its underlying infrastructure, and showing in a case study how this framework supports the various visit phases in an actual museum. The suggested framework is generic; it is not limited to a specific setting or scenario and it is open and can be easily adopted and used by practitioners and researchers to be implemented in different sites and settings. As such, it provides a further step in extending the cultural heritage experience beyond the on-site visit and towards linking individual episodes into complete, memorable personal experiences.

Keywords

Visitors guides Mobile guides Mobile guides development framework 

References

  1. Abowd DG, Atkeson CG, Hong J, Long S, Kooper R, Pinkerton M (1997) Cyberguide: a mobile context-aware tour guide. Wireless Netw 3(5):421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato F, Chianese A, Mazzeo A, Moscato V, Picariello A, Piccialli F (2013) The talking museum project. Proc Comput Sci 21:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelaccio M, Basili A, Buttarazzi B, Liguori W (2012) June. Smart and mobile access to cultural heritage resources: a case study on ancient Italian renaissance villas. In: 2012 IEEE 21st international workshop on enabling technologies: infrastructure for collaborative enterprises (WETICE). IEEE, pp 310–314Google Scholar
  4. Ardissono L, Kuflik T, Petrelli D (2012) Personalization in cultural heritage: the road travelled and the one ahead. User Model User Adapt Interact 22(1–2):73–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Zaharia M (2010) A view of cloud computing. Commun ACM 53(4):50–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belinky I, Lanir J, Kuflik T (2012) Using handheld devices and situated displays for collaborative planning of a museum visit. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international symposium on pervasive displays (PerDis ‘12), Porto. ACM, New York (Article 19)Google Scholar
  8. Bitgood S, Shettel HH (1996) An overview of visitor studies. J Museum Educ 21(3):6–10Google Scholar
  9. Boiano S, Bowen JP, Gaia G (2012) Usability, design and content issues of mobile apps for cultural heritage promotion: the Malta Culture Guide experience. arXiv:1207.3422Google Scholar
  10. Choudary O, Charvillat V, Grigoras R, Gurdjos P (2009) MARCH: mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on multimedia. ACM, pp 1023–1024Google Scholar
  11. Cohen E (1985) The Tourist Guide: the origins, structure, and dynamics of a role. Ann Tourism Res 12(1):5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coralini A, Guidazzoli A, Malfetti P, Spigarolo M, Baglivo A (2014) Cloud computing and virtual heritage: the social media-oriented paradigm experienced at Cineca. In: 2014 IEEE 3rd symposium on network cloud computing and applications (NCCA). IEEE, pp 121–124Google Scholar
  13. Costello S (2013) How many apps are in the iPhone app store. About.com Guide (June 2014). http://ipod.about.com/od/iphonesoftwareterms/qt/apps-in-app-store.htm. (Retrieved 22 June 2014)
  14. Dediu H (2012) App developers receive $12 for each iOS device sold. Asymco (Feb. 2012). http://www.asymco.com/2012/02/19/app-developers-get-12-for-each-ios-device-sold/. (Retrieved 22 June 2014)
  15. Dim E, Kuflik T (2013) Early detection of pairs of visitors by using a museum triage. Selected papers from museums and the web 2013, pp 113–124Google Scholar
  16. Dunstall S, Horn M, Kylbi P, Krishnamoorthy M, Owens B, Sier D, Thiebaux S (2003) An automated itinerary planning system for holiday travel. Inf Technol Tourism 6(3):195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falk JH (2009) Identity and the museum visitor experience. Left Coast Press Inc., Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell J, Nezlek GS (2007) Rich internet applications the next stage of application development. In: 29th International conference on information technology interfaces, 2007 (ITI 2007). IEEE, Cavtat, pp 413–418Google Scholar
  19. Gavalas D, Economou D (2011) Development platforms for mobile applications: status and trends. IEEE Softw 28(1):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giemza A (2013) Mobilogue—a tool for creating and conducting mobile supported field trips. QScience proceedings, 12th world conference on mobile and contextual learning (mLearn 2013)Google Scholar
  21. IMLS grant (2009) http://tapintomuseums.org/IMLS-Grant. (Accessed 2 Sep 2013)
  22. Hanson R, Tacy A (2007) GWT in action: easy ajax with the google web toolkit. Manning PublicationGoogle Scholar
  23. Haugstvedt AC, Krogstie J (2012) Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: a technology acceptance study. In: 2012 IEEE international symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR), pp 247–255Google Scholar
  24. Heckmann D, Krueger A (2003) A user modeling markup language (UserML) for ubiquitous computing. User modeling 2003. Springer, Berlin, pp 393–397Google Scholar
  25. Heckmann D, Schwartz T, Brandherm B, Schmitz M, von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff M (2005) GUMO—the general user model ontology. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on user modeling (UM’2005), Edinburgh. Springer, Berlin, LNAI 3538, pp 428–432Google Scholar
  26. Höpken W, Fuchs M, Zanker M, Beer T (2010) Context-based adaptation of mobile applications in tourism. J Inf Technol Tourism 12(2):175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2009) An innovative mobile electronic tourist guide application. Pers Ubiquit Comput 1:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kenteris M, Gavalas D, Economou D (2011) Electronic mobile guides: a survey. Pers Ubiquit Comput 15(1):97–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koers W, van der Giessen A, van Weelden M, Becker J (2012) Future of cultural heritage—impact of external developments—paper incorporating the outcomes of the 18 December 2012 European Policy Workshop, Brussels. http://www.foresightfordevelopment.org/sobipro/55/979-future-of-cultural-heritage-impact-of-external-developments (Accessed 29 June 2014)
  30. Kuflik T, Stock O, Zancanaro M, Gorfinkel A, Jbara S, Kats S, Sheidin J, Kashtan N (2011) A visitor’s guide in an “active museum”: presentations, communications, and reflection. ACM J Comput Cult Heritage 3(3):Article 11Google Scholar
  31. Kuflik T, Lanir J, Dim E, Wecker A, Corra M, Zancanaro M, Stock O (2012) Indoor positioning in cultural heritage: challenges and a solution. In: 2012 IEEE 27th convention of proceedings of the electrical and electronics engineers in Israel (IEEEI), EilatGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuflik T, Wecker A, Lanir J, Mogilevsky O, Kali Y, Maayan E, Korman M, Weiss T, Amber E, Rimon O (2013) A different kind of experience: using a smart mobile guide for education and aging research at the Hecht museum. Museums and the web. http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/hecht-smart-mobile-guide/. (Accessed 2 Sep 2013)
  33. Lanir J, Wecker AJ, Kuflik T, Dim E, Beja I, Belinky I, Gordon I, Kashtan N, Mogilevsky O, Stock O, Zancanaro M (2010) From a research prototype to a deployed system: the case of the Hecht museum visitor’s guide. MCIS 2010, Tel Aviv, Paper 53. http://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2010/53/ (Accessed Sep 2013)
  34. Lanir J, Kuflik T, Stock O, Wecker A, Zancanaro M (2011) Examining proactiveness and choice in a location-aware mobile museum guide. Interact Comput 23(5):513–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lanir J, Kuflik T, Dim E, Wecker A, Stock O (2013) The influence of a location-aware mobile guide on museum visitors’ behavior patterns. Interacting with computers (available online, accessed Sep 2013)Google Scholar
  36. Lanir J, Kuflik T, Zolantz I, Lanzet U (2013) Personalized video summary of a museum visit. AI* HCI@ AI* IA, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  37. Lanir J, Bak P, Kuflik T (2014) Visualizing proximity-based spatiotemporal behavior of museum visitors using tangram diagrams. Comput Graphics Forum 33(3):261–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lubbers P, Albers B, Salim F (2011) Using the WebSocket API. Pro HTML5 Programming, 159-91Google Scholar
  39. Marty PF (2007) Museum websites and museum visitors: before and after the museum visit. Museum Manage Curatorship 22(4):337–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McManus P (1991) Towards understanding the needs of museum visitors. In: Lord B, Lord GD (eds) Manual of museum planning. HMSO, London, pp 35–51Google Scholar
  41. Meliá S, Martínez JJ, Mira S, Osuna J, Gómez J (2010) An eclipse plug-in for model-driven development of rich internet applications. Web Engineering, pp 514–517Google Scholar
  42. Mendes CM, Silva L, Bellon OR (2012) IMAGO visualization System: an interactive web-based 3D visualization system for cultural heritage applications. J Multimedia 7(2):205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oberlander J, O’Donnell M, Mellish C, Knott A (1998) Conversation in the museum: experiments in dynamic hypermedia with the intelligent labeling explorer. New Rev Multimedia Hypermedia 4:11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Petrelli D, Ciolfi L, van Dijk D, Hornecker E, Not E, Schmidt A (2013) Integrating material and digital: a new way for cultural heritage. Interactions 20(4):58–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raptis D, Tselios N, Avouris N (2005) Context-based design of mobile applications for museums: a survey of existing practices. In: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (MobileHCI 2005), Salzburg, pp 153–160Google Scholar
  46. Ricci F, Werthner H (2001) Case base querying for travel planning recommendation. Inf Technol Tourism 4(3–4):215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schaffers H, Komninos N, Pallot M, Trousse B, Nilsson M, Oliveira A (2011) Smart cities and the future internet: towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. Springer, Berlin, pp 431–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Semper R, Spasojevic M (2002) The electronic guidebook: using portable devices and a wireless web-based network to extend the museum experience. In: Proceedings of museums and the web conference, Boston. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2002/papers/semper/semper.html
  49. Sheng CW, Chen MC (2012) A study of experience expectations of museum visitors. Tour Manag 33:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Snickars P (2009) The archival cloud. The YouTube reader. National Library of Sweden, Stockholm, pp 292–313Google Scholar
  51. Stock O (2001) Language-based interfaces and their application for cultural tourism. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park. AI Magazine 22(1):85–97Google Scholar
  52. Stock O, Carenini G, Cecconi F, Franconi E, Lavelli A, Magnini B, Pianesi F, Ponzi M, Samek-Lodovici V, Strapparava C (1993) Alfresco: enjoying the combination of NLP and hypermedia for information exploration. In: Maybury MT (ed) Intelligent multimedia interfaces. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, pp 197–224Google Scholar
  53. Stock O, Zancanaro M, Busetta P, Callaway C, Krüger A, Kruppa M, Kuflik T, Not E, Rocchi C (2007) Adaptive, intelligent presentation of information for the museum visitor in PEACH. User Model User Adapt Interact 17(3):257–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tallon L, Walker K (eds) (2008) Digital technologies and the museum experience: handheld guides and other media. Rowman AltamiraGoogle Scholar
  55. Umlauft M, Pospischil G, Niklfeld G, Michlmayr E (2003) LoL@, a mobile tourist guide for UMTS. In: Werthnerand H, Veit E (eds) Information technology and tourism, vol 5, pp 151–164Google Scholar
  56. Van Aart C, Wielinga B, Van Hage WR (2010) Mobile cultural heritage guide: location-aware semantic search. In: Knowledge engineering and management by the masses. Springer, Berlin, pp 257–271Google Scholar
  57. Walhimer M (2011) The future of interactivity? Museum planing. http://museumplanner.org/future-of-interactivity/. (Accessed July 2014)
  58. Wang Y, Stash N, Aroyo L, Gorgels P, Rutledge L, Schreiber G (2008) Recommendations based on semantically enriched museum collections. J Web Semantics 6(4):283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wecker AJ, Lanir J, Kuflik T, Stock O (2011) Pathlight: supporting navigation of small groups in the museum context. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services, Stockholm, pp 569–574Google Scholar
  60. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wigelius H, Väätäjä H (2009) Dimensions of context affecting user experience in mobile work. In: Human–computer interaction—INTERACT 2009. Springer, pp 604–617Google Scholar
  62. Zhang Y, Luo Y (2010) An architecture and implement model for Model-View-Presenter pattern. In: 2010 3rd international conference on computer science and information technology, vol 8, pp 532–536Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tsvi Kuflik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alan J. Wecker
    • 1
  • Joel Lanir
    • 1
  • Oliviero Stock
    • 2
  1. 1.The University of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.FBK-irstTrentoItaly

Personalised recommendations