Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the official tourism website of five east tourism destinations

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Information Technology & Tourism Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper has two research objectives. First, it adopts the Information, Communication, Transaction, Relationship, and Technical Merit model to evaluate Destination Marketing Organization (DMO) web sites from five East Asian countries. Second, it examines the relationship between website complexity and performance. The results indicate that the five selected DMO websites have not fully utilized information technology in their business operations. All five websites have performed reasonably well on the information and communication dimensions. However, three web sites perform poorly in the transaction dimension. Among the five selected countries, the Korean DMO’s website received the highest score for effectiveness, followed by the Japanese, Thai, and Hong Kong websites. The Macau DMO’s website received the lowest score for effectiveness. In addition to evaluating website effectiveness, this study found a linear relationship between website complexity and performance. Also there are significant performance variances among the DMOs’ websites across different countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal R, Venkatesh V (2002) Assessing a firm’s web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Info Syst Res 13(2):168–186

  • Chiou WC, Lin CC, Perng C (2011) A strategic website evaluation of online travel agencies. Tour Manag 32(6):1463–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung J, Tan FB (2004) Antecedents of perceived playfulness: an exploratory study on user acceptance of general information-searching websites. Info Manag 41(7):869–881

  • Day A (1999) A model for monitoring web site effectiveness. Internet Res Electron Netw Appl Policy 7(2):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devaraj S, Fan M, Kohli R (2002) Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: validating e-Commerce metrics. Info Syst Res 13(3):316–333

  • Dholakia UM, Rego LL (1998) What makes commercial Web pages popular? An empirical investigation of Web page effectiveness. Eur J Mark 32(7):724–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doolin B, Burgess L, Cooper J (2002) Evaluating the use of the web for tourism marketing: a case study from New Zealand. Tour Manag 23(5):557–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Segev A (1999) Business transformation on the internet. Eur Manag J 17(5):466–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng R, Morrison AM, Ismail JA (2003) East versus west: a comparison of online destination marketing in China and the U.S. J Vacat Mark 10(1):43–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant M (2013) The 25 most popular destinations for Chinese tourists, Euromonitor International. http://skift.com/2013/09/03/top-25-most-popular-destinations-for-chinese-tourists/

  • Hu C, Han YX, Jang SC, Bill B (2005) E-relational characteristics on hospitality and tourism program web sites. J Hosp Tour Res 29(2):508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ip C, Law R, Lee HA (2011) A review of website evaluation studies in the tourism and hospitality fields from 1996 to 2009. Int J Tour Res 13(3):234–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law R, Hsu C (2005) Customers perceptions on the importance of hotel website dimensions and attributes. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 17(6/7):493–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JK, Morrison AM (2010) A comparative study of website performance. J Hosp Tour Technol 1(1):50–67

  • Li X, Wang Y (2010) Evaluating the effectiveness of destination marketing organizations’ websites: evidence from China. Int J Tour Res 12(5):536–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Wang Y (2011) Measuring the effectiveness of US official state tourism websites. J Mark 17(4):287–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison AM, Morrison AJ, Morrison AD, Taylor JS (1999) Marketing small hotels on the World Wide Web. Inf Technol Tour 2(2):104–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison AM, Taylor J, Douglas A (2004) Website evaluation in tourism and hospitality: the art is not yet stated. J Travel Tour Mark 17(2/3):233–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer A, McCole P (2000) The role of electronic commerce in creating virtual tourism destination marketing organizations. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 2000:198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon A (1993) Tourism, technology and competitive strategies. CAB International, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi S, Buhalis D, Law R (2007) Evaluation of the usability on Chinese destination management organisation websites. In: Sigala M, Mich L, Murphy J (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2007 New York. Springer, Wien, pp 267–278

  • Rita P (2000) Web marketing tourism destinations. In: ECIS, pp 1096–1103, January 2000

  • Schmidt S, Cantallops AS, Santos CP (2008) The characteristics of hotel websites and their implications for website effectiveness. Int J Hosp Manag 27(2):504–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A (2002) Trends in internet-based business to- business marketing. Ind Mark Manag 31(2):77–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siguaw JA, Enz CA, Namasivayam K (2000) Adoption of information technology in U.S. hotels: strategically driven objectives. J Travel Res 39(2):192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkov M, Price J (2006) Hotelier’s 2006 top ten internet marketing resolutions. Retrieved from: http://www.hospitalityebusiness.com

  • Tan GW, Wei KK (2006) An empirical study of web browsing behaviour: towards an effective website design. Electron Commer Res Appl 5(1):261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt CA (2010) Customer relationship management in tourism: management needs and research applications. J Travel Res 50(4):356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2008) Web-based destination marketing systems: assessing the critical factors for management and implementation. Int J Tour Res 10(1):55–70

  • Wang Y, Russo SM (2007) Conceptualizing and evaluating the functions of destination marketing systems. J Vacat Mark 13(3):187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilgen JV (2009) 66% of US leisure travelers use internet to plan some aspect of their travel. Retrieved from: http://www.tourismroi.com/InteriorTemplate.aspx?ID=32418

  • Yeung TA, Law R (2006) Evaluation of usability: a study of hotel web sites in Hong Kong. J Hosp Tour Res 30(4):452–473.

  • Yuan YL, Gretzel U, Fesenmairer DR (2006) The role of information technology use in American convention and visitors Bureaus. Tour Manag 27(2):326–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen-Kuo Pai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pai, CK., Xia, M.L. & Wang, TW. A comparison of the official tourism website of five east tourism destinations. Inf Technol Tourism 14, 97–117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-014-0007-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-014-0007-7

Keywords

Navigation