Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current Strategy of Fetal Therapy II: Invasive Fetal Interventions

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Fetal Medicine

Abstract

Invasive fetal intervention provides potential benefits to the fetus, but risks to the mother and the fetus are not negligible. Large congenital pulmonary airway malformation (CPAM) may cause fetal hydrops. Shunt placement in macrocystic type or steroids administration in microcystic type CPAM have been reported to reverse the hydrops in a small case series. In selected cases of fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), tracheal plugging may prevent egress of the lung fluid, promote lung proliferation, and maturation of pulmonary vasculature, which favor survival in isolated right-sided CDH fetuses or those with a lung-to-head ratio of ≤1.0. Fetoscopic cystoscopy with laser fulguration of the posterior urethral valve improves the 6-month survival and renal function. A randomized controlled trial to validate the real benefits of this procedure is still underway. Laser photocoagulation of anastomosing vessels is the standard of care for severe mid-trimester twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. The principle of equipoise is likely to be reached on the issue of optimal treatment for Quintero stage I disease. Open fetal surgery has been offered in some cases of fetal tumor and myelomeningocele (MMC). Alternatively, endoscopic approach is being investigated to minimize procedure-related maternal morbidity. Only when procedure-related complications are properly prevented and managed, it is expected that invasive therapeutic innovation will then improve perinatal outcomes of selected fetal conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stocker JT, Madewell JE, Drake RM. Congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Classification and morphologic spectrum. Hum Pathol. 1977;8:155–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Crombleholme TM, Coleman B, Hedrick H, et al. Cystic adenomatoid malformation volume ratio predicts outcome in prenatally diagnosed cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adzick NS. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal anomalies. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adzick NS, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM. Management of congenital lung lesions. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2003;12:10–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson RD. In-utero therapy for fetal thoracic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:619–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson RD, Johnson MP. Prenatal ultrasound guided percutaneous shunts for obstructive uropathy and thoracic disease. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2003;12:182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Merchant AM, Peranteau W, Wilson RD, et al. Postnatal chest wall deformities after fetal thoracoamniotic shunting for congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22:435–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Litwinska M, Litwinska E, Janiak K, Piaseczna-Piotrowska A, Gulczynska E, Szaflik K. Thoracoamniotic shunts in macrocystic lung lesions: case series and review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41:179–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peranteau WH, Wilson RD, Liechty KW, et al. Effect of maternal betamethasone administration on prenatal congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation growth and fetal survival. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22:365–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Curran PF, Jelin EB, Rand L, et al. Prenatal steroids for microcystic congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:145–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morris LM, Lim FY, Livingston JC, Polzin WJ, Crombleholme TM. High-risk fetal congenital pulmonary airway malformations have a variable response to steroids. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44:60–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grethel EJ, Wagner AJ, Clifton MS, et al. Fetal intervention for mass lesions and hydrops improves outcome: a 15-year experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42:117–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bruner JP, Jarnagin BK, Reinisch L. Percutaneous laser ablation of fetal congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation: too little, too late? Fetal Diagn Ther. 2000;15:359–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Milner R, Kitano Y, Olutoye O, Flake AW, Adzick NS. Radiofrequency thermal ablation: a potential treatment for hydropic fetuses with a large chest mass. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:386–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peranteau WH, Adzick NS, Boelig MM, et al. Thoracoamniotic shunts for the management of fetal lung lesions and pleural effusions: a single-institution review and predictors of survival in 75 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rustico MA, Lanna M, Coviello D, Smoleniec J, Nicolini U. Fetal pleural effusion. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:793–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yinon Y, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Chaddha V, et al. Perinatal outcome following fetal chest shunt insertion for pleural effusion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:58–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Davenport M, Greenough A, Nicolaides KH. Fetal nuchal translucency thickness at 10–14 weeks’ gestation and congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:943–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jani J, Nicolaides KH, Keller RL, et al. Observed to expected lung area to head circumference ratio in the prediction of survival in fetuses with isolated diaphragmatic hernia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:67–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. DeKoninck P, Gomez O, Sandaite I, et al. Right-sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia in a decade of fetal surgery. BJOG. 2015;122:940–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bojanic K, Woodbury JM, Cavalcante AN, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: outcomes of neonates treated at Mayo Clinic with and without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Paediatr Anaesth. 2017;27:314–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ruano R, Peiro JL, da Silva MM, et al. Early fetoscopic tracheal occlusion for extremely severe pulmonary hypoplasia in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia: preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:70–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nawapun K, Eastwood MP, Diaz-Cobos D, et al. In vivo evidence by magnetic resonance volumetry of a gestational age dependent response to tracheal occlusion for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Prenat Diagn. 2015;35:1048–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deprest J, De Coppi P. Antenatal management of isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia today and tomorrow: ongoing collaborative research and development. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:282–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Maary J, Eastwood MP, Russo FM, Deprest JA, Keijzer R. Fetal tracheal occlusion for severe pulmonary hypoplasia in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival. Ann Surg. 2016;264:929–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Anumba DO, Scott JE, Plant ND, Robson SC. Diagnosis and outcome of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction in the northern region of England. Prenat Diagn. 2005;25:7–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Clark TJ, Martin WL, Divakaran TG, Whittle MJ, Kilby MD, Khan KS. Prenatal bladder drainage in the management of fetal lower urinary tract obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:367–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morris RK, Malin GL, Quinlan-Jones E, et al. Percutaneous vesicoamniotic shunting versus conservative management for fetal lower urinary tract obstruction (PLUTO): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1496–506.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruano R, Sananes N, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, et al. Fetal intervention for severe lower urinary tract obstruction: a multicenter case-control study comparing fetal cystoscopy with vesicoamniotic shunting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:452–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Blickstein I, Jones C, Keith LG. Zygotic-splitting rates after single-embryo transfers in in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2366–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Knopman J, Krey LC, Lee J, Fino ME, Novetsky AP, Noyes N. Monozygotic twinning: an eight-year experience at a large IVF center. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:502–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kagan KO, Gazzoni A, Sepulveda-Gonzalez G, Sotiriadis A, Nicolaides KH. Discordance in nuchal translucency thickness in the prediction of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29:527–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Maiz N, Staboulidou I, Leal AM, Minekawa R, Nicolaides KH. Ductus venosus Doppler at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation in the prediction of outcome in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:860–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Matias A, Montenegro N, Loureiro T, et al. Screening for twin-twin transfusion syndrome at 11–14 weeks of pregnancy: the key role of ductus venosus blood flow assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:142–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Taylor MJ, Denbow ML, Tanawattanacharoen S, Gannon C, Cox PM, Fisk NM. Doppler detection of arterio-arterial anastomoses in monochorionic twins: feasibility and clinical application. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:1632–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sebire NJ, Souka A, Skentou H, Geerts L, Nicolaides KH. Early prediction of severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2008–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hack KE, Nikkels PG, Koopman-Esseboom C, et al. Placental characteristics of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies in relation to perinatal outcome. Placenta. 2008;29:976–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lewi L, Lewi P, Diemert A, et al. The role of ultrasound examination in the first trimester and at 16 weeks’ gestation to predict fetal complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:493.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Satapornteera P, Raveesunthornkiat M, Sukpanichnant S, Tongdee T, Homsud S, Wataganara T. Effects of power and time on ablation size produced by radiofrequency ablation: in vitro study in fresh human placenta. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38:41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Huber A, Diehl W, Bregenzer T, Hackeloer BJ, Hecher K. Stage-related outcome in twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated by fetoscopic laser coagulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:333–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Middeldorp JM, Sueters M, Lopriore E, et al. Fetoscopic laser surgery in 100 pregnancies with severe twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome in the Netherlands. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007;22:190–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cincotta RB, Gray PH, Gardener G, Soong B, Chan FY. Selective fetoscopic laser ablation in 100 consecutive pregnancies with severe twin-twin transfusion syndrome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49:22–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sago H, Hayashi S, Saito M, et al. The outcome and prognostic factors of twin-twin transfusion syndrome following fetoscopic laser surgery. Prenat Diagn. 2010;30:1185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chmait RH, Kontopoulos EV, Korst LM, Llanes A, Petisco I, Quintero RA. Stage-based outcomes of 682 consecutive cases of twin-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery: the US fetus experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:393.e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Slaghekke F, Favre R, Peeters SH, et al. Laser surgery as a management option for twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:304–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Bond SJ, Harrison MR, Schmidt KG, et al. Death due to high-output cardiac failure in fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. J Pediatr Surg. 1990;25:1287–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wilson RD, Hedrick H, Flake AW, et al. Sacrococcygeal teratomas: prenatal surveillance, growth and pregnancy outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25:15–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Altman RP, Randolph JG, Lilly JR. Sacrococcygeal teratoma: American Academy of Pediatrics surgical section survey-1973. J Pediatr Surg. 1974;9:389–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Adzick NS, Crombleholme TM, Morgan MA, Quinn TM. A rapidly growing fetal teratoma. Lancet. 1997;349:538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Makin EC, Hyett J, Ade-Ajayi N, Patel S, Nicolaides K, Davenport M. Outcome of antenatally diagnosed sacrococcygeal teratomas: single-center experience (1993–2004). J Pediatr Surg. 2006;41:388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hecher K, Hackeloer BJ. Intrauterine endoscopic laser surgery for fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Lancet. 1996;347:470.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lam YH, Tang MH, Shek TW. Thermocoagulation of fetal sacrococcygeal teratoma. Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:99–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:993–1004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tulipan N, Wellons JC 3rd, Thom EA, et al. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele and the need for cerebrospinal fluid shunt placement. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;16:613–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Bruner JP. Intrauterine surgery in myelomeningocele. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007;12:471–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Johnson MP, Bennett KA, Rand L, et al. The management of myelomeningocele study: obstetrical outcomes and risk factors for obstetrical complications following prenatal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:778.e1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Farrell JA, Albanese CT, Jennings RW, Kilpatrick SJ, Bratton BJ, Harrison MR. Maternal fertility is not affected by fetal surgery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1999;14:190–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Longaker MT, Golbus MS, Filly RA, Rosen MA, Chang SW, Harrison MR. Maternal outcome after open fetal surgery: a review of the first 17 human cases. JAMA. 1991;265:737–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Joyeux L, Engels AC, Russo FM, et al. Fetoscopic versus open repair for spina bifida aperta: a systematic review of outcomes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;39:161–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wataganara T, Seshadri S, Leung TY, et al. Establishing prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele in Asia: the Singapore consensus. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41:167–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 550: maternal–fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:218–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Donepudi R, Papanna R, Snowise S, Johnson A, Bebbington M, Moise KJ Jr. Does anemia-polycythemia complicating twin-twin transfusion syndrome affect outcome after fetoscopic laser surgery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:340–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Peeters SH, Stolk TT, Slaghekke F, et al. Iatrogenic perforation of intertwin membrane after laser surgery for twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:550–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Galvan A, Alvarez E, Parraguirre S, Suarez ML, Perez A. Development of a fetal rabbit model to study amniotic band syndrome. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2012;31:300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Maternal–Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, 2 Prannok Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand

    Katika Nawapun, Nisarat Phithakwatchara, Tacharee Panchalee, Sommai Viboonchart, Nadda Mongkolchat & Tuangsit Wataganara

Authors
  1. Katika Nawapun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nisarat Phithakwatchara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tacharee Panchalee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sommai Viboonchart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nadda Mongkolchat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tuangsit Wataganara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuangsit Wataganara.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Source of Funding

Funding was provided by Mahidol University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nawapun, K., Phithakwatchara, N., Panchalee, T. et al. Current Strategy of Fetal Therapy II: Invasive Fetal Interventions. J. Fetal Med. 4, 139–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40556-017-0132-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40556-017-0132-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation