Advertisement

Customer Needs and Solutions

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 94–103 | Cite as

Hide Supremacy or Admit Inferiority—Market Entry Strategies in Response to Consumer Informational Needs

  • Yuanfang Lin
  • Amit PazgalEmail author
Research Article
  • 367 Downloads

Abstract

This paper investigates information provision and pricing decisions by vertically differentiated firms sequentially entering a market where consumers face uncertainty about the quality of the new product offering as well as their own preferences or willingness to pay for quality. We find that regardless of the quality of the late entrant firm’s product, the first entrant would like to commit to and provide quality-revealing information. Surprisingly, we find that a late entrant with a superior product may choose not to inform consumers of its better quality, even if that would result in consumers perceiving its product to be of inferior quality. Instead, the high-quality late entrant will opt to educate consumers about their preference for quality. On the other hand, a late entrant offering a low-end product may wish to admit to offering an inferior product rather than allowing consumers to incorrectly assume that its product may be of higher quality. We identify the primary driving factors for these seemingly unexpected informational services decisions to be the cost of educating and helping consumers to resolve different types of uncertainties, the degree of vertical product differentiation, and the early entrant service preemption.

Keywords

Consumer uncertainty Informational service Competitive strategy Game theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Amadeo R. (2014) Samsung Decides 56 Smartphones a Year is Too Many, Will Cut Lineup by 30%. Artstechnica.com, Nov 18, 2014 (http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/11/samsung-decides-56-smartphones-a-year-is-too-many-will-cut-lineup-by-30/)
  2. 2.
    Anderson S, Renault R (2006) Advertising Content. Am Econ Rev 96(1):93–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson S, Renault R (2009) Comparative advertising: disclosing horizontal match information. RAND J Econ 40(3):558–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Besharat A, Langan RJ, Nguyen CG (2015) Fashionably Late: Strategies for Competing Against a Pioneer Advantage. J Bus Res, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boulding W, Kalra A, Staelin R, Zeithaml VA (1993) A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions. J Mark Res 30:7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Branco F, Sun M, Villas-Boas JM (2015) Too Much Information? Information Provision and Search Costs. Market Sci. forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carpenter GS, Nakamoto K (1989) Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J Mark Res 26(3):285–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carpenter GS, Nakamoto K (1990) Competitive strategies for late entry into a market with a dominant brand. Manag Sci 36(10):1268–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: a new element of marketing communication mix. Manag Sci 54(3):477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis S, Gerstner E, Hagerty M (1995) Money back guarantees in retailing: matching products to consumer tastes. J Retail 71(1):7–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gregan-Paxton J (1999) How Does Prior Knowledge Influence Consumer Learning? A Study of Analogy and Categorization Effects. working paper, Department of Business Administration, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grossman S (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):461–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gu Z, Liu Y (2013) Consumer fit search, retail shelf layout, and channel interaction. Mark Sci 59(5):1196–1212Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gu Z, Xie Y (2013) Facilitating fit revelation in the competitive market. Manag Sci 59(5):1196–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guo (2009) Quality disclosure formats in a distribution channel. Manag Sci 55(9):1513–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo L, Zhao Y (2009) Voluntary quality disclosure and market interaction. Mark Sci 28(3):488–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heiman A, McWilliams B, Zilberman D (2001) Demonstrations and money-back guarantees: market mechanisms to reduce uncertainty. J Bus Res 54:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heskett JL, Sasser WE, Schlesinger LA (1997) The Service Profit Chain. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Isaiah D (2014) Digital Marketing is the New Normal for Car Manufacturers. Automotive Megatrends Magazine, 2nd Quarter Issue, 2014. (http://www.automotiveworld.com/megatrends-articles/digital-marketing-new-normal-car-manufacturers/)
  20. 20.
    Kopalle PK, Lehmann DR (2006) Setting quality expectations when entering a market: what should the promise be?”. Mark Sci 25(1):8–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuksov D, Lin Y (2010) Information provision in a vertically differentiated competitive marketplace. Mark Sci 29(1):122–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis TR, Sappington DEG (1994) Supplying information to facilitate price discrimination. Int Econ Rev 35(2):309–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mayzlin D, Shin J (2011) Uninformative advertising as an invitation to search. Mark Sci 30(4):666–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miklós-Thal J, Zhang J (2013) (De)marketing to manage consumer quality inferences. J Mark Res 50(1):55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milgrom P (1981) Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications. Bell J Econ 12(2):380–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moreau CP, Markman AB, Lehmann DR (2001) “What Is It?” Categorization flexibility and consumers’ responses to really new products. J Consum Res 27:489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Newman GE, Gorlin M, Dhar R (2014) When going green backfires: how firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. J Consum Res 41:823–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osman MA, Talib AZ, Sanusi ZA, Tan A, Alwi AS (2012) A study of the trend of smartphone and its usage behavior in Malaysia. Int J New Comput Architectures Appl (IJNCAA) 2(1):275–286Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ratchford B (2009) Consumer Search Behavior and Its Effect on Markets. Foundations and Trends in Marketing: Vol. 3 No. 1Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sun M (2011) Disclosing multiple product attributes. J Econ Manag Strateg 20(1):195–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tirole J (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization. The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wernerfelt B (1994) On the function of sales assistance. Mark Sci 13(1):68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zhang S, Markman AB (1998) Overcoming the early entrant advantage: the role of alignable and nonalignable differences. J Mark Res 35(4):413–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and HospitalityConestoga CollegeKitchenerCanada
  2. 2.Jones Graduate School of BusinessRice UniversityHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations