Advertisement

Friction

pp 1–27 | Cite as

Identification and modelling of applicable wear conditions for stir cast Al-composite

  • Santanu Sardar
  • Santanu Kumar Karmakar
  • Debdulal DasEmail author
Open Access
Research Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

A comprehensive study of the tribological performance of the Al-Zn-Mg-Cu/Al2O3 composite and its matrix alloy is presented in this paper, with a specific emphasis to identify and model the applicable wear conditions where the composite provides a minimum of 50% reduction in wear rate and 25% lowering of the friction coefficient. Two-body abrasion experiments following Taguchi L27 orthogonal design have been performed separately on alloy and composite materials, both prepared by the stir casting method. The influence of crucial control factors including silicon carbide (SiC) abrasive size, load, sliding distance, and velocity on the percentage variations of wear rates and friction coefficients between alloy and composite have been studied using the analysis of variance technique and full quadratic regression method. The dominant control factors are identified as abrasive size, load, and the interaction between abrasive size and load. This has been verified by establishing the influence of abrasive size and load on variations of wear mechanisms like microcutting, microploughing, and delamination, identified by means of in-depth characterization of worn surfaces and generated debris for both alloy and composite. The selection of applicable tribological condition for the composite has been accomplished by adopting the multi-response optimization technique based on combined desirability approach to obtain concurrent optimization of the percentage variations of wear rates and friction coefficients. Predictive models correlating the superiority of tribological performance of composite with abrasion conditions have been developed, and these are found to be accurate (errors <10%), as determined by confirmatory experiment.

Keywords

aluminum matrix composite tribology design of experiment Taguchi multi-response optimization abrasion mechanism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors recognize the support obtained from the Centre of Excellence on Microstructurally Designed Advanced Materials Development under TEQIP-II, IIEST Shibpur. The assistance granted from DST-FIST to set up Advanced Tribology Laboratory under the Department of Mechanical Engineering, IIEST Shibpur is also highly appreciated.

References

  1. [1]
    Mazahery A, Shabani M O. A356 reinforced with nanoparticles: Numerical analysis of mechanical properties. JOM 64(2): 323–329 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Singh J. Fabrication characteristics and tribological behavior of Al/SiC/Gr hybrid aluminum matrix composites: A review. Friction 4(3): 191–207 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Das S, Das S, Das K. Abrasive wear of zircon sand and alumina reinforced Al-4.5 wt% Cu alloy matrix composites-A comparative study. Compos Sci Technol 67(3-4): 746–751 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Mondal D P, Das S, Jha A K, Yegneswaran A H. Abrasive wear of Al alloy-Al2O3 particle composite: A study on the combined effect of load and size of abrasive. Wear 223(1-2): 131–138 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kumar P R S, Kumaran S, Rao T S, Natarajan S. High temperature sliding wear behavior of press-extruded AA6061/fly ash composite. Mater Sci Eng A 527(6): 1501–1509 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Borgonovo C, Apelian D. Manufacture of aluminum nanocomposites: A critical review. Mater Sci Forum 678: 1–22 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Kumar S, Balasubramanian V. Effect of reinforcement size and volume fraction on the abrasive wear behaviour of AA7075 Al/SiCp P/M composites—A statistical analysis. Tribol Int 43(1-2): 414–422 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Ahmed A, Neely A J, Shankar K, Nolan P, Moricca S, Eddowes T. Synthesis, tensile testing, and microstructural characterization of nanometric SiC particulate-reinforced Al 7075 matrix composites. Metall Mater Trans A 41(6): 1582–1591 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Dursun T, Soutis C. Recent developments in advanced aircraft aluminium alloys. Mater Des 56: 862–871 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Chawla N, Chawla K K. Metal-matrix composites in ground transportation. JOM 58(11): 67–70 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Miracle D B. Metal matrix composites-from science to technological significance. Compos Sci Technol 65(15-16): 2526–2540 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hassan S F, Gupta M. Effect of submicron size Al2O3 particulates on microstructural and tensile properties of elemental Mg. J Alloys Compd 457(1-2): 244–250 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Rahimian M, Parvin N, Ehsani N. The effect of production parameters on microstructure and wear resistance of powder metallurgy Al-Al2O3 composite. Mater Des 32(2): 1031–1038 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Sardar S, Karmakar S K, Das D. Ultrasonic cavitation based processing of metal matrix nanocomposites: An overview. Adv Mater Res 1042: 58–64 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Sahin Y, Özdin K. A model for the abrasive wear behaviour of aluminium based composites. Mater Des 29(3): 728–733 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Suresha B, Siddaramaiah, Kishore, Seetharamu S, Kumaran P S. Investigations on the influence of graphite filler on dry sliding wear and abrasive wear behaviour of carbon fabric reinforced epoxy composites. Wear 267(9-10): 1405–1414 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kumar A, Mahapatra M M, Jha P K. Modeling the abrasive wear characteristics of in-situ synthesized Al-4.5% Cu/TiC composites. Wear 306(1-2): 170–178 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Harsha A P, Tewari U S. Two-body and three-body abrasive wear behaviour of polyaryletherketone composites. Polym Test 22(4): 403–418 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Sheu C Y, Lin S J. Particle size effects on the abrasive wear of 20 vol% SiCp/7075Al composites. Scr Mater 35(11): 1271–1276 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lin S J, Liu K S. Effect of aging on abrasion rate in an Al-Zn-Mg-SiC composite. Wear 121(1): 1–14 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Das S, Mondal D P, Sawla S, Dixit S. High stress abrasive wear mechanism of LM13-SiC composite under varying experimental conditions. Metall Mater Trans A 33(9): 3031–3044 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kök M, Özdin K. Wear resistance of aluminium alloy and its composites reinforced by Al2O3 particles. J Mater Process Technol 183(2-3): 301–309 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Wang A G, Hutchings I M. Wear of alumina fibre-aluminium metal matrix composites by two-body abrasion. Mater Sci Technol 5(1): 71–76 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Deuis R L, Subramanian C, Yellup J M. Abrasive wear of aluminium composites—a review. Wear 201(1-2): 132–144 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Roy R K. A Primer on the Taguchi Method. New York (USA): Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Dehnad K. Quality Control, Robust Design, and the Taguchi Method. Boston (USA): Springer, 1989: 2015–2015.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Şahin Y. Abrasive wear behaviour of SiC/2014 aluminium composite. Tribol Int 43(5-6): 939–943 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Sardar S, Karmakar S K, Das D. Microstructure and tribological performance of alumina-aluminum matrix composites manufactured by enhanced stir casting method. J Tribol 141(4): 041602 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Hashim J, Looney L, Hashmi M S J. Particle distribution in cast metal matrix composites—part II. J Mater Process Technol 123(2): 258–263 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Naher S, Brabazon D, Looney L. Simulation of the stir casting process. J Mater Process Technol 143-144: 567–571 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Prabu S B, Karunamoorthy L, Kathiresan S, Mohan B. Influence of stirring speed and stirring time on distribution of particles in cast metal matrix composite. J Mater Process Technol 171(2): 268–273 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Ezatpour H R, Sajjadi S A, Sabzevar M H, Huang Y Z. Investigation of microstructure and mechanical properties of Al6061-nanocomposite fabricated by stir casting. Mater Des 55: 921–928 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Kok M. Production and mechanical properties of Al2O3 particle-reinforced 2024 aluminium alloy composites. J Mater Process Technol 161(3): 381–387 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Yilmaz O, Buytoz S. Abrasive wear of Al2O3-reinforced aluminium-based MMCs. Compos Sci Technol 61(16): 2381–2392 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Hashim J, Looney L, Hashmi M S J. Metal matrix composites: Production by the stir casting method. J Mater Process Technol 92-93: 1–7 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Umanath K, Palanikumar K, Selvamani S T. Analysis of dry sliding wear behaviour of Al6061/SiC/Al2O3 hybrid metal matrix composites. Compos Part B Eng 53: 159–168 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Yigezu B S, Mahapatra M M, Jha P K. On modeling the abrasive wear characteristics of in situ Al-12% Si/TiC composites. Mater Des 50: 277–284 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Sardar S, Karmakar S K, Das D. Evaluation of abrasive wear resistance of Al2O3/7075 composite by taguchi experimental design technique. Trans Indian Inst Met 71(8): 1847–1858 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Rokni M R, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi H R. Microstructure evolution and mechanical properties of back extruded 7075 aluminum alloy at elevated temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A 532: 593–600 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Karunanithi R, Bera S, Ghosh K S. Electrochemical behaviour of TiO2 reinforced Al 7075 composite. Mater Sci Eng B 190: 133–143 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Yilmaz S O. Comparison on abrasive wear of SiCrFe, CrFeC and Al2O3 reinforced Al2024 MMCs. Tribol Int 40(3): 441–452 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Akbari M K, Mirzaee O, Baharvandi H R. Fabrication and study on mechanical properties and fracture behavior of nanometric Al2O3 particle-reinforced A356 composites focusing on the parameters of vortex method. Mater Des, 46: 199–205 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Kumar R, Dhiman S. A study of sliding wear behaviors of Al-7075 alloy and Al-7075 hybrid composite by response surface methodology analysis. Mater Des 50: 351–359 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Sajjadi S A, Parizi M T, Ezatpour H R, Sedghi A. Fabrication of A356 composite reinforced with micro and nano Al2O3 particles by a developed compocasting method and study of its properties. J Alloys Compd, 511(1): 226–231 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    Misra A, Finnie I. A classification of three-body abrasive wear and design of a new tester. Wear 60(1): 111–121 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Baskaran S, Anandakrishnan V, Duraiselvam M. Investigations on dry sliding wear behavior of in situ casted AA7075-TiC metal matrix composites by using Taguchi technique. Mater Des 60: 184–192 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Siddhartha, Patnaik A, Bhatt A D. Mechanical and dry sliding wear characterization of epoxy-TiO2 particulate filled functionally graded composites materials using Taguchi design of experiment. Mater Des 32(2): 615–627 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Yunus M, Alsoufi M S. Multi-output optimization of tribological characteristics control factors of thermally sprayed industrial ceramic coatings using hybrid Taguchi-grey relation analysis. Friction 4(3): 208–216 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Wen J L, Yang Y K, Jeng M C. Optimization of die casting conditions for wear properties of alloy AZ91D components using the Taguchi method and design of experiments analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(5-6): 430–439 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Rohatgi P K, Tabandeh-Khorshid M, Omrani E, Lovell M R, Menezes P L. Tribology of metal matrix composites. In Tribology for Scientists and Engineers. Menezes P L, Nosonovsky M, Ingole S P, Kailas S V, Lovell M R, Eds. New York: Springer, 2013: 233–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Kapsiz M, Durat M, Ficici F. Friction and wear studies between cylinder liner and piston ring pair using Taguchi design method. Adv Eng Softw 42(8): 595–603 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Koksal S, Ficici F, Kayikci R, Savas O. Experimental optimization of dry sliding wear behavior of in situ AlB2/Al composite based on Taguchi’s method. Mater Des 42: 124–130 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Sardar S, Karmakar S K, Das D. High stress abrasive wear characteristics of Al 7075 alloy and 7075/Al2O3 composite. Measurement 127: 42–62 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Agarwal G, Patnaik A, Sharma R K, Agarwal J. Effect of stacking sequence on physical, mechanical and tribological properties of glass-carbon hybrid composites. Friction 2(4): 354–364 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Diler E A, Ipek R. Main and interaction effects of matrix particle size, reinforcement particle size and volume fraction on wear characteristics of Al-SiCp composites using central composite design. Compos Part B Eng 50: 371–380 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Yu S Y, Ishii H, Tohgo K, Cho Y T, Diao D F. Temperature dependence of sliding wear behavior in SiC whisker or SiC particulate reinforced 6061 aluminum alloy composite. Wear 213(1-2): 21–28 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Bowden F P, Tabor D. The Friction and Lubrication of Solids. Oxford (UK): Clarendon Press, 1986.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Hutchings I M, Shipway P H. Tribology: Friction and Wear of Engineering Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford (USA): Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017.Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Sin H, Saka N, Suh N P. Abrasive wear mechanisms and the grit size effect. Wear 55(1): 163–190 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Rabinowicz E, Mutis A. Effect of abrasive particle size on wear. Wear 8(5): 381–390 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Larsen-Badse J. Influence of grit size on the groove formation during sliding abrasion. Wear 11(3): 213–222 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Richardson R C D. The wear of metals by relatively soft abrasives. Wear 11(4): 245–275 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    Wang A G, Rack H J. Abrasive wear of silicon carbide particulate and whisker-reinforced 7091 aluminum matrix composites. Wear 146(2): 337–348 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Lee H L, Lu W H, Chan S L I. Abrasive wear of powder metallurgy Al alloy 6061-SiC particle composites. Wear 159(2): 223–231 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Sardar S, Karmakar S K, Das D. Tribological properties of Al 7075 Alloy and 7075/Al2O3 composite under two-body abrasion: A statistical approach. J Tribol, 140(5): 051602 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    Rohatgi P K, Guo R Q, Huang P, Ray S. Friction and abrasion resistance of cast aluminum alloy-fly ash composites. Metall Mater Trans A 28(1): 245–250 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    Zum Gahr K H. Modelling of two-body abrasive wear. Wear 124(1): 87–103 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    Kaushik N C, Rao R N. Influence of applied load on abrasive wear depth of hybrid Gr/SiC/Al-Mg-Si composites in a two-body condition. J Tribol 139(6): 061601 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    Modi O P, Yadav R P, Mondal D P, Dasgupta R, Das S, Yegneswaran A H. Abrasive wear behaviour of zinc-aluminium alloy-10% Al2O3 composite through factorial design of experiment. J Mater Sci 36(7): 1601–1607 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    Box G E P, Draper N R. Empirical Model-building and Response Surfaces. New York (USA): Wiley, 1987.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    Bradley N. The response surface methodology. Master’s thesis. South Bend (USA): Indiana University South Bend, 2007.Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Rao C R. Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications. 2nd ed. New York (USA): Wiley, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2019

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Li-cense, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or for-mat, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not in-cluded in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://doi.org/creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Santanu Sardar
    • 1
  • Santanu Kumar Karmakar
    • 1
  • Debdulal Das
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Engineering Science and TechnologyHowrahIndia
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgy and Materials EngineeringIndian Institute of Engineering Science and TechnologyHowrahIndia

Personalised recommendations