An experimental methodology for the concurrent characterization of multiple parameters influencing nanoscale friction

Abstract

A structured transdisciplinary method for the experimental determination of friction in the nanometric domain is proposed in this paper. The dependence of nanoscale friction on multiple process parameters on these scales, which comprise normal forces, sliding velocities, and temperature, was studied via the lateral force microscopy approach. The procedure used to characterize the stiffness of the probes used, and especially the influence of adhesion on the obtained results, is thoroughly described. The analyzed thin films were obtained by using either atomic layer or pulsed laser deposition. The developed methodology, based on elaborated design of experiments algorithms, was successfully implemented to concurrently characterize the dependence of nanoscale friction in the multidimensional space defined by the considered process parameters. This enables the establishment of a novel methodology that extends the current state-of-the-art of nanotribological studies, as it allows not only the gathering of experimental data, but also the ability to do so systematically and concurrently for several influencing variables at once. This, in turn, creates the basis for determining generalizing correlations of the value of nanoscale friction in any multidimensional experimental space. These developments create the preconditions to eventually extend the available macro- and mesoscale friction models to a true multiscale model that will considerably improve the design, modelling and production of MEMS devices, as well as all precision positioning systems aimed at micro- and nanometric accuracy and precision.

References

  1. [1]

    Bhushan B. Springer Handbook of Nanotechnology. Berlin, Heidelberg (Germany): Springer-Verlag, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [2]

    Marques F, Flores P, Claro J C P, Lankarani H M. A survey and comparison of several friction force models for dynamic analysis of multibody mechanical systems. Nonlinear Dyn86(3): 1407–1443 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. [3]

    Mekid S. Precision design aspects for friction actuation with error compensation. J Mech Sci Technol23(11): 2873–2884 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. [4]

    Al-Bender F, Lampaert V, Swevers J. Modeling of dry sliding friction dynamics: From heuristic models to physically motivated models and back. Chaos14(2): 446–460 (2004)

  5. [5]

    Kamenar E, Zelenika S. Issues in validation of pre-sliding friction models for ultra-high precision positioning. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci233(3): 997–1006 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. [6]

    Piatkowski T. GMS friction model approximation. Mech Mach Theory75: 1–11 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. [7]

    Yoon J Y, Trumper D L. Friction modeling, identification, and compensation based on friction hysteresis and Dahl resonance. Mechatronics24(6): 734–741 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. [8]

    Kamenar E, Zelenika S. Nanometric positioning accuracy in the presence of presliding and sliding friction: Modelling, identification and compensation. Mech Based Des Struc Mach45(1): 111–126 (2017

  9. [9]

    Liu Y F, Li J, Zhang Z M, Hu X H, Zhang W J. Experimental comparison of five friction models on the same test-bed of the micro stick-slip motion system. Mech Sci6(1): 15–28 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. [10]

    Mate C M. Tribology on the Small Scale: A Bottom Up Approach to Friction, Lubrication, and Wear. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  11. [11]

    De Moerlooze K, Al-Bender F. On the relationship between normal load and friction force in pre-sliding frictional contacts. Part 2: Experimental investigation. Wear269(3–4): 183–189 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. [12]

    Krylov S Y, Frenken J W M. The crucial role of temperature in atomic scale friction. J Phys Condens Mat20(35): 354003 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. [13]

    Yu J X, Hu H L, Jia F, Yuan W F, Zang H B, Cai Y, Ji F. Quantitative investigation on single-asperity friction and wear of phosphate laser glass against a spherical AFM diamond tip. Tribol Int81: 43–52 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. [14]

    Zelenika S. Analytical and experimental characterization of ball-groove contact problems. In Proceedings of the 3rdDAAAM International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Developing Countries, Split, Croatia, 2004: 75–80.

  15. [15]

    Manini N, Mistura G, Paolicelli G, Tosatti E, Vanossi A. Current trends in the physics of nanoscale friction. Adv Phys2(3): 569–590 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. [16]

    University of Rijeka, Croatia. Equipment of the centre for micro- and nanosciences and technologies.

  17. [17]

    University of Rijeka, Croatia. Centre for micro- and nanosciences and technologies. https://doi.org/nanori.uniri.hr/, 2018.

  18. [18]

    Simonovic K, Kalin M. Methodology of a statistical and DOE approach to the prediction of performance in tribology—A DLC boundary-lubrication case study. Tribol Int101: 10–24 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. [19]

    Hinkelmann K, Kempthorne O. Design and Analysis of Experiments—Vol. 1: Introduction to Experimental Design. 2nd ed. Hoboken (Belgium): John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. [20]

    Alam F M, McNaught K R, Ringrose T J. A comparison of experimental designs in the development of a neural networ metamodel. Simul Model Pract Theory12(7–8): 559–578 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. [21]

    Du Q, Faber V, Gunzburger M. Centroidal voronoi tessellations: Applications and algorithms. SIAM Rev41(4): 637–676 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. [22]

    Kecman V. Learning and Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks, and Fuzzy Logic Models. Cambridge (USA): MIT Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. [23]

    AIMdyn System Analytics, Engineering Consulting and Software Development. GoSUMD software. https://doi.org/aimdyn.com/gosumd, 2018.

  24. [24]

    Perčić M, Zelenika S, Mezic I, Peter R, Krstulović N. Experimental approach to establishing a model of nanoscale friction. In Proceedings of the 18th EUSPEN International Conference, Cranfield, UK, 2018: 63–64.

  25. [25]

    Yang L, Hu J H, Xiao H P, Quan W W. Analysis of humidity-dependent adhesion between a probe tip and a surface. Particuology33: 91–97 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. [26]

    Meljanac D, Juraic K, Plodinec M, Siketić Z, Gracin D, Krstulović N, Salamon K, Skenderović H, Kregar Z, Rakić I Š, et al. Influence of RF excitation during pulsed laser deposition in oxygen atmosphere on the structural properties and luminescence of nanocrystalline ZnO:Al thin films. J Vac Sci Technol A34(2): 021514 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. [27]

    Wagner C D, Riggs W M, Davis L E, Moulder J F, Muilenberg G E. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Eden Prairie (USA): Perkin-Elmer Corporation, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. [28]

    Payne B P, Biesinger M C, McIntyre N S. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies of reactions on chromium metal and chromium oxide surfaces. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenomena184(1–2): 29–37 (2011)

  29. [29]

    Bruker. Stylus Profilometers Dektak XT. https://doi.org/www.bruker.com/products/surface-and-dimensional-analysis/stylus-profilometers/dektak-xt/overview.html, 2018.

  30. [30]

    Bruker. AFM probes SNL-10. https://doi.org/www.brukerafmprobes.com/p-3693-snl-10.aspx, 2018.

  31. [31]

    Belikov S, Alexander J, Wall C, Yermolenko I, Magonov S, Malovichko I. Thermal tune method for AFM oscillatory resonant imaging in air and liquid. In Proceedings of 2014 American Control Conference, Portland, OR, USA, 2014: 1009–1014.

  32. [32]

    Perčić M, Zelenika S, Kamenar E. Issues in validation of friction in the nanometric domain. In Proceedings of the 17th EUSPEN International Conference, Cranfield, UK, 2017: 105–106.

  33. [33]

    Sader J E. Parallel beam approximation for V-shaped atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum66(9): 4583–4587 (1995

  34. [34]

    Zhang X R, Fisher T S, Raman A, Sands T D. Linear coefficient of thermal expansion of porous anodic alumina thin films from atomic force microscopy. Nanosc Microsc Therm Eng13(4): 243–252 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. [35]

    MIKROMASCH. Test structures — TGF11 series. https://doi.org/www.spmtips.com/test-structures-TGF11-series.html, 2018.

  36. [36]

    Varenberg M, Etsion I, Halperin G. An improved wedge calibration method for lateral force in atomic force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum74(7): 3362–3367 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. [37]

    University of Trieste, Italy. Laboratorio MOSE. https://doi.org/www.mose.units.it/default.aspx, 2018.

  38. [38]

    D’Acunto M. Theoretical approach for the quantification of wear mechanisms on the nanoscale. Nanotechnology15(7): 795–801 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. [39]

    Liu J J, Notbohm J K, Carpick R W, Turner K T. Method for characterizing nanoscale wear of atomic force microscope tips. ACS Nano4(7): 3763–3772 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. [40]

    Bhushan B. Adhesion and stiction: Mechanisms, measurement techniques, and methods for reduction. J Vac Sci Technol B21(6): 2262 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. [41]

    ×olak A, Wormeester H, Zandvliet H J W, Poelsema B. Surface adhesion and its dependence on surface roughness and humidity measured with a flat tip. Appl Surf Sci258(18): 6938–6942 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. [42]

    Rabinovich Y I, Adler J J, Ata A, Singh R K, Moudgil B M. Adhesion between nanoscale rough surfaces: II. Measurement and comparison with theory. J Colloid Interface Sci232(1): 17–24 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. [43]

    Tranchida D, Piccarolo S, Deblieck R A C. Some experimental issues of AFM tip blind estimation: The effect of noise and resolution. Meas Sci Technol17(10): 2630–2636 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. [44]

    Bruker. AFM Probes — RS titanium roughness sample. https://doi.org/www.brukerafmprobes.com/a-3552-rs.aspx, 2018.

  45. [45]

    Miller D C, Foster R R, Jen S H, Bertrand J A, Cunningham S J, Morris A S, Lee Y C, George S M, Dunn M L. Thermo-mechanical properties of alumina films created using the atomic layer deposition technique. Sensor Actuat A Phys164(1–2): 58–67 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. [46]

    Mandel J. The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data. New York (USA): John Wiley & Sons, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  47. [47]

    Dagdeviren O E. Exploring load, velocity, and surface disorder dependence of friction with one-dimensional and two-dimensional models. Nanotechnology29(31): 315704 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. [48]

    Tambe N S, Bhushan B. Friction model for the velocity dependence of nanoscale friction. Nanotechnology16(10): 2309–2324 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work described in this paper is enabled by using the equipment funded via the ERDF project RC.2.2.06-0001 “Research Infrastructure for Campus-based Laboratories at the University of Rijeka — RISK”, as well as via the support of the University of Rijeka grants uniri-tehnic-18-32 “Advanced mechatronics devices for smart technological solutions” and 4581 “Measuring, modelling and compensating friction in high-precision devices: From macro- to nanometric scale”. The work was partially supported also by the Croatian Science Foundation project IP-11-2013-2753 “Laser Cold Plasma Interaction and Diagnostics”. The GoSumD software is provided by AIMdyn, Inc.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saša Zelenika.

Additional information

Marko PERČIĆ. He received his master degree in mechanical engineering in 2012 from the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Rijeka, Croatia. He is presently a D. Sc. student at the same University working on nanoscale characterization of materials. He is staff member of the Centre for Micro- and Nanosciences and Technologies of the University of Rijeka. His research interests include experimental nanotribology, atomic force microscopy, thin films, mathematical modelling and data mining.

Saša ZELENIKA. He graduated at the University of Rijeka, Croatia and attained the D. Sc. degree at the Polytechnic University of Turin, Italy. He was Head of Mechanical Engineering at the Paul Scherrer Institute in Switzerland. From 2004 he is faculty member of the University of Rijeka, Faculty of Engineering (since 2015 full professor with tenure) where he was dean’s assistant, department head and is laboratory head. In 2012–2014 he was Assistant and then Deputy Minister at the Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sports. Currently he is Rector’s Assistant and Head of the Centre for Micro- and Nanoscience and Technologies at the University of Rijeka. His research interests encompass precision engineering and microsystems technologies.

Igor MEZIĆ. He graduated at the University of Rijeka, Croatia and got the Ph.D. degree from Caltech. He was postdoctoral fellow at the University of Warwick, UK, joined the University of California (UC), Santa Barbara and moved to Harvard University before returning to UC Santa Barbara, where he became a full professor in 2003. He holds numerous awards and honors in the fields of physics, mathematics (Sloan Fellowship) and engineering. He is Fellow of the American Physical Society and of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. He holds 4 US patents, and 3 technological companies (Ecorithm, iFluidics and AIMdyn) were founded on the basis of his patents and algorithms. He is currently professor at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at UC Santa Barbara and chief scientist at Packetsled, Inc. His research interests are in developments in operator theory, machine learning and artificial intelligence.

Robert PETER. He received his master degree at the University of Rijeka, Croatia and the D. Sc. degree at the University of Zagreb, Croatia. From 2016 he is employed as assistant professor at the Department of Physics and the Centre for Micro- and Nanosciences and Technologies at the University of Rijeka. His research interests include physics of semiconductor surfaces and the development and characterization of metal oxide nanostructures.

Nikša KRSTULOVIĆ. He received his Ph.D. degree in physics at the University of Zagreb, Croatia. He is employed at the Institute of Physics, Zagreb, Croatia where he is leader of the Plasma Unit Group of the Centre of Advanced Laser Techniques (CALT). He spent two years on a postdoc position at the University College Dublin under a Marie Curie fellowship working on EUV light sources. His research interests include laser produced and non- equilibrium plasmas, atmospheric plasmas, plasma diagnostics, high-harmonic generation, extreme light sources, synthesis and applications of nanoparticles by laser ablation in liquids and PLD of thin films.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perčić, M., Zelenika, S., Mezić, I. et al. An experimental methodology for the concurrent characterization of multiple parameters influencing nanoscale friction. Friction 8, 577–593 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-019-0289-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • nanoscale friction
  • lateral force microscopy
  • experimental determination methodology
  • multivariate space
  • contact mechanics