Advertisement

Friction

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 274–288 | Cite as

Combined effect of boundary layer formation and surface smoothing on friction and wear rate of lubricated point contacts during normal running-in processes

  • Yazhao Zhang
  • Alexander Kovalev
  • Yonggang Meng
Open Access
Research Article

Abstract

The combined effect of boundary layer formation and surface smoothing on friction and wear rate of metallic surfaces under lubricated point contact condition was investigated. The double trend of friction coefficient variations was revealed during running-in and sub-running-in processes. The evolution of surface topography was measured on-site using white-light interference profilometer and analyzed using bearing area curves. Comprehensive theoretical equations that explicitly express the contributions of boundary friction, adhesive friction and wear have been derived, and results obtained by these equations were compared with experimental observations. It is concluded that the theoretical models are quantitatively adequate to describe the combined effect of surface smoothing due to mechanical wear and formation of boundary films on the changes in friction and wear rate during normal running-in processes.

Keywords

running-in bearing area curves friction modeling wear modeling mixed lubrication 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by NSFC under grant No. 51635009 and by the State Administration of Foreign Expert Affairs under grant No. DL2017QHDX001.

References

  1. [1]
    Blau P J. Running-in. In Encyclopedia of Tribology. Wang Q J, Chung Y W, Eds. Boston, MA: Springer, 2013: 2967–2969.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Blau P J. On the nature of running-in. Tribol Int 38(11–12): 1007–1012 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Williams J. Engineering Tribology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Blau P J. Mechanisms for transitional friction and wear behavior of sliding metals. Wear 72(1): 55–66 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Blau P J. How common is the steady-state? The implications of wear transitions for materials selection and design. Wear 332–333: 1120–1128 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Blau P J. Embedding wear models into friction models. Tribol Lett 34(1): 75–79 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Goryacheva I G. Wear models. In Contact Mechanics in Tribology. Goryacheva I G, Ed. Dordrecht: Springer, 1998: 163–190.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Meng H C, Ludema K C. Wear models and predictive equations: their form and content. Wear 181–183: 443–457 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Archard J. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys 24(8): 981–988 (1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Bowden F P, Leben L. The friction of lubricated metals. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 239(799): 1–27 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Bai L Q, Meng Y G, Khan Z A, Zhang V. The synergetic effects of surface texturing and MoDDP additive applied to ball-on-disk friction subject to both flooded and starved lubrication conditions. Tribol Lett 65(4): 163 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Raymond G B. Mechanical Wear Fundamentals and Testing. 2nd ed. New York (USA): Marcel Dekker Inc., 2004.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Kapoor A, Williams J A, Johnson K L. The steady state sliding of rough surfaces. Wear 175(1–2): 81–92 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Straffelini G. Wear processes. In Friction and Wear: Methodologies for Design and Control. Straffelini G, Ed. Cham: Springer, 2015: 115–158.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bair S S. High Pressure Rheology for Quantitative Elastohydrodynamics. Amsterdam (Netherlands), Boston (USA): Elsevier, 2007.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Bair S, Winer W O. A rheological model for elastohydrodynamic contacts based on primary laboratory data. J Lubr Technol 101(3): 258–264 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Hao L C, Meng Y G. Numerical prediction of wear process of an initial line contact in mixed lubrication conditions. Tribol Lett 60(2): 31 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Bhushan B, Israelachvili J N, Landman U. Nanotribology: friction, wear and lubrication at the atomic scale. Nature 374(6523): 607–616 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Wang W, Wong P L. Wear volume determination during running-in for PEHL contacts. Tribol Int 33(7): 501–506 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Abbott E J, Firestone F A. Specifying surface quality. Mech Eng, 55: 569–572 (1933)Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Sosa M, Sellgren U, Björklund S, Olofsson U. In situ running-in analysis of ground gears. Wear 352–353: 122–129 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Jiang X, Scott P J, Whitehouse D J, Blunt L. Paradigm shifts in surface metrology. Part II. The current shift. Proc R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci, 463(2085): 2071–2099 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    DIN 4776. Kenngrößen Rk, Rpk, Rvk, Mr1, Mr2 zur Beschreibug des Materialanteils im Rauheitsprofil— Meßbedingungen und Auswerteverfahren. In Deutsche Norm. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH, 1990.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    ISO. ISO 25178–2: 2012 Geometrical Product Specifications GPS)–Surface texture: Areal–Part 2: Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO, Geneva, 2012.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Böhm H J. Parameters for evaluating the wearing behaviour of surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manu 32(1–2): 109–113 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Corral I B, Calvet J V, Salcedo M C. Use of roughness probability parameters to quantify the material removed in plateau-honing. Int J Mach Tools Manu 50(7): 621–629 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Franco L A, Sinatora A. 3D surface parameters (ISO 25178–2): Actual meaning of S pk and its relationship to V mp. Precis Eng 40: 106–111 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Yusof N F M, Ripin Z M. A technique to measure surface asperities plastic deformation and wear in rolling contact. Wear 368–369: 496–504 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Podulka P, Pawlus P, Dobrzański P, Lenart A. Spikes removal in surface measurement. J Phys Conf Ser 483(1): 012025 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yazhao Zhang
    • 1
  • Alexander Kovalev
    • 1
  • Yonggang Meng
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of TribologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations