Transfer of electrons on scratched iron surfaces: Photoelectron emission and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy studies
- 57 Downloads
We report the activation energy, ΔE a, for the quantum yield in thermally assisted photoelectron emission (TAPE) under 210-nm-wavelength light irradiation, and the associated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results. Samples were cleaned only in acetone and scratched in air, water, methanol, ethanol, acetone, benzene, and cyclohexane. Glow curves, describing the temperature dependence of photoelectron emission (PE) quantum yield (emitted electrons/photon), Y, were obtained. A simple method of determining ΔE a using Y, called Y GC, at seven temperatures up to 353 °C, for the same Y glow curve, was proposed. The ΔE a obtained using this method was almost the same as that obtained from Y for seven stationary temperatures (Y ST). For scratched samples, the TAPE was measured over two cycles of temperature increase and subsequent decrease (Up1, Down1 and Up2, Down2 scans) in the 25–339 °C range, and ΔE a was obtained from Y GC. The Arrhenius plot was approximated by a straight line, although a convex swelling peak appeared in the Up1 scan. ΔE aUp1 was in the 0.212–0.035 eV range, depending on the environment in which scratching was performed; ΔE aUp1 for water was much higher than that for acetone. This was explained in terms of the mode of the acid–base interaction between the liquid molecules and the hydroxyl group of Fe–OH. The values of ΔE aDown1, ΔE aUp2, and ΔE aDown2 were in the 0.038–0.012 eV range. The total count of electrons emitted during the Up1 and Up2 scans was found to decrease with increasing ΔE aUp1 and ΔE aUp2, respectively. ΔE aUp2 was found to increase with increasing presence of the FeO component in the analyzed Fe oxides. The convex swelling peak was attributed to the removal of carbon materials from the scratched surface and the effect of the increased electron density of the surface hydroxyl group of FeOH under the light irradiation.
Keywordsthermally assisted photoelectron emission XPS real iron scratch-inducing environment Arrhenius activation energy environment molecule-surface hydroxyl group interaction
The authors would like to thank the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan for supporting this work through a grant in aid.
- Spicer W E. Surface analysis by means of photoemission and other photon-stimulated processes. In Chemistry and Physics of Solid Surfaces. Vanselow R, Tong S Y, Ed. Cleveland: CRC Press, 1977: 235–254.Google Scholar
- DuBridge L A. New Theories of the Photoelectric Effect. Paris: Hermann and Cie, 1935.Google Scholar
- Gutmann V. Ion pairing and outer sphere effect. Chimia 31: 1–7 (1977)Google Scholar
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton affinity (data page), Source: Jolly W L. Modern Inorganic Chemistry, 2nd Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991, [Accessed 12 June 2015].Google Scholar
- Bolger J C, Michaels A S. Molecular structure and electrostatic interactions at polymer–solid interfaces. In Interface Conversion for Polymer Coatings. Weiss P, Cheever G D, Eds. New York: Elsevier, 1968: 3–60.Google Scholar
- Huheey J E. Inorganic Chemistry, Principles of Structure and Reactivity, 3rd ed. Harper & Row: New York, 1983. Japanese translation by Kodama G, Nakazawa H. Tokyo Kagaku Dojin: Tokyo, 1984, 340–341 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- Conder K. Electronic and ionic conductivity in metal oxides. Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland, pp. 1–44, [Accessed 27 May 2015].Google Scholar
Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provided a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.