Advertisement

Friction

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 387–394 | Cite as

Effect of arc–current and spray distance on elastic modulus and fracture toughness of plasma-sprayed chromium oxide coatings

  • Simanchal Kar
  • Partha Pratim Bandyopadhyay
  • Soumitra Paul
Open Access
Research Article
  • 202 Downloads

Abstract

In this experimental study, chromium oxide powder was sprayed on a low-carbon steel substrate using the atmospheric plasma spray process. The current and standoff distances (SODs) were varied to study their effect on the fracture toughness of the coatings. Theoretically, as the arc current increases, the melting of the ceramic oxide should increase and this in turn should lead to the formation of a dense coating. However, it was observed that if the arc power is too high and because the particle size of the powder is small (approximately 30 μm), the particles tend to fly away from the plasma core. Similarly, an appropriate SOD should provide the particles with more melting time, thus resulting in a dense coating. On the other hand, a larger SOD leads to the solidification of the molten particles before the droplets can reach the substrate. All these effects may lead to substantial variation in the fracture toughness of the coating. The present paper attempts to correlate the plasma spraying parameters and microstructure of the coating with the fracture toughness and other primary coating properties.

Keywords

chromia coating fracture toughness plasma spray critical plasma spray parameter critical depth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to Prof. Mihir Sarangi, IIT Kharagpur for providing his research facilities. Authors also acknowledge the MHRD, Govt. of India for the financial support.

References

  1. [1]
    Halling J. Principles of Tribology. London (UK): Macmillan Education, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Cetinel H, Celik E, Kusoglu M I. Tribological behavior of Cr2O3 coatings as bearing materials. J Mater Process Technol 196(1–3): 259–265 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Wang B Q, Shui Z R, Levy A V. Sliding wear of thermal-sprayed chromia coatings. Wear 138(1–2): 93–110 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Heimann R B. Plasma Spray Coating: Principles and Applications. 2nd ed. Weinheim (Germany): Wiley-VCH, 2008: 1–427.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Pawlowski L. Technology of thermally sprayed anilox rolls: State of art, problems, and perspectives. J Therm Spray Technol 5(3): 317–334 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Pawlowski L. The Science and Engineering of Thermal Spray Coatings. Chichester (UK): Wiley, 1995.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Lawn B R, Evans A G, Marshall D B. Elastic/plastic indentation damage in ceramics: The median/radial crack system. J Am Ceramic Soc 63(9–10): 574–581 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Callister W D Jr. Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering: An Integrated Approach. New York (USA): John Wiley & Sons, 2001.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Evans A G, Charles E A. Fracture toughness determinations by indentation. J Am Ceramic Soc 59(7–8): 371–372 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Bifano T G, Dow T A, Scattergood R O. Ductile-regime grinding: A new technology for machining brittle materials. J Eng Ind 113(2): 184–189 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Zhang D, Li C, Jia D, Wang S, Li R, Qi X. Grinding model and material removal mechanism of medical nanometer zirconia ceramics. Recent Pat Nanotechnol 8(1): 2–17 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Lawn B R, Evans A G. A model for crack initiation in elastic/plastic indentation fields. J Mater Sci 12(11): 2195–2199 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Beshish G K, Florey C W, Worzala F J, Lenling W J. Fracture toughness of thermal spray ceramic coatings determined by the indentation technique. J Therm Spray Technol 2(1): 35–38 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Du H, Shin J H, Lee S W. Study on porosity of plasma-sprayed coatings by digital image analysis method. J Therm Spray Technol 14(4): 453–461 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Bandyopadhyay P P, Chicot D, Venkateshwarlu B, Racherla V, Decoopman X, Lesage J. Mechanical properties of conventional and nanostructured plasma sprayed alumina coatings. Mech Mater 53: 61–71 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kar S, Paul S, Bandyopadhyay P P. Processing and characterisation of plasma sprayed oxides: Microstructure, phases and residual stress. Surf Coat Technol 304: 364–374 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Zhang J, Chen H, Lee S W, Ding C X. Evaluation of adhesion/cohesion of plasma sprayed ceramic coatings by scratchtesting. In Thermal Spray 2007: Global Coating Solutions: Proceedings of the 2007 International Thermal Spray Conference, ASM International, 2007: 472–477.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simanchal Kar
    • 1
  • Partha Pratim Bandyopadhyay
    • 1
  • Soumitra Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurWest BengalIndia

Personalised recommendations