Advertisement

Friction

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 266–276 | Cite as

The validity of the Reynolds equation in spool valve analysis considering cavitation

  • Sung-Ho Hong
  • Kyung-Woong KimEmail author
Open Access
Research Article

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the validity of the Reynolds equation in spool valve analysis under cavitation. This study is carried out for a laminar and isothermal flow between a sleeve and spool with grooves. The pressure and lateral force obtained from the Reynolds equation and the Navier-Stokes equation are compared with variations of aspect ratio, cross sectional area, and number of grooves. The cavitation phenomenon is considered by using a cavitation model in the Navier-Stokes equation and the Reynolds cavitation boundary condition in the Reynolds equation. A large difference of more than 20% is found between the equations for a lateral force of spool valve with many grooves. It was found that the Reynolds equation is not suitable for calculation of a lateral force of the spool valve with multiple-grooves of which the width and depth are even larger than the clearance under cavitation.

Keywords

validity Reynolds equation Navier-Stokes equation spool valve cavitation 

References

  1. [1]
    Sasaki A, Yamamoto T. A review of studies of hydraulic lock. Lubrn Eng 49: 585–593 (1993)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Brajdic-Mitidieri P, Gosman A D, Ioannides E, Spikes H A. CFD analysis of a low friction pocketed pad bearing. J Tribol 127: 803–811 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Song D J, Seo D K, Shults W W. A comparison study between Navier-Stokes equation and Reynolds equation in lubricating flow regime. Int J Kor Soc Mech Eng 17: 599–605 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Guardino C, Chew J W, Hills N J. Calculation of surface roughness effects on air-riding seals. ASME J Eng Gas Turbines Power 126: 75–82 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Almqvist T, Larsson R. Some remarks on the validity of Reynolds equation in the modeling of lubricant film flows on the surface roughness scale. J Tribol 126: 703–710 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Dobrica M B, Fillon M. Reynolds model suitability in simulating Rayleigh step bearing thermohydrodynamic problems. Tribol Trans 48: 522–530 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Dobrica M B, Fillon M. About the validity of Reynolds equation and inertia effects in textured sliders of infinite width. Proc IMechE 223: 69–78 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Feldman Y, Kligerman Y, Etsion I, Haber S. The validity of the Reynolds equation in modelling hydrostatic effects in gas lubricated textured parallel surfaces. J Tribol 128: 345–350 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    De Kraker A, Ostayen R A J, Rixen D J. A multiscale method modeling surface texture effects. J Tribol 129: 221–230 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Li J, Chen H. Evaluation on applicability of Reynolds equation for squared transverse roughness compared to CFD. J Tribol 129: 963–967 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Odyck van D E A, Venner C H. Stokes flow in thin films. J Tribol 125: 121–134 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Odyck van D E A, Venner C H. Compressible stokes flow in thin films. J Tribol 125: 543–551 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Sahlin F, Glavatskih S B, Almqvist T, and Larsson R. Twodimensional CFD analysis of micro-patterned surfaces in hydrodynamic lubrication. J Tribol 127: 96–102 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Arghir M, Roucou N, Helene M, Frene J. Theoretical analysis of the incompressible laminar flow in macro-roughness cell. J Tribol 125: 309–318 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Ausas R, Ragot P, Leiva J, Jai M, Bayada G, Buscaglia G. The impact of the cavitation model in the analysis of microtextured lubricated journal bearing. J Tribol 129: 868–875 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Elrod H G, Adams M. A computer program for cavitation. In First Leeds-Lyon Symposium on Cavitation and Related Phenomena in Lubrication, I. M. E., Mechanical Engineering, New York, 1974: 37–41.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Qiu Y, Khonsari M M. On the prediction of cavitation in dimples using a mass-conservation algorithm. J Tribol 131: 041702-1~041702–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    FLUENT 6.3 User’s GuideGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Singhal A K, Athavale M M, Li H, Jiang Y. Mathematical basis and validation of the full cavitation model. J Fluids Eng 124: 617–624 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hong S H, Kim K W. A new type groove for hydraulic spool valve. Tribol Int 103: 629–640 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Etsion I, Burstein L. A model for mechanical seals with regular micro surface structure. Tribol Trans 39: 677–683 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Kunz R F, Boger D A, Stinebring D R, Chyczewski T S, Lindau J W, Gibeling H J, Venkateswaran S, Govindan, T R. A preconditioned Navier-Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction. Comput Fluids 29: 849–875 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Lindau J W, Kunz R F, Boger D A, Stinebring D R, Gibeling H J. High Reynolds number, unsteady multiphase CFD modeling of cavitating flows. J Fluids Eng 124: 607–616 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Systems EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations