Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Present and Future Burden of Contact Dermatitis from Acrylates in Manicure

  • Contact Dermatitis (A Gimenez-Arnau, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Allergy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

(Meth)acrylates are chemical compounds used in a wide variety of settings such as nail esthetics and the medical field. A progressive increase in the frequency of acrylate-induced sensitization likely caused by the popularity and wide-spread use of semi-permanent polishes has been described.

Recent Findings

Several factors contribute to such scenario including the insufficient training of beauticians regarding the risks posed by the manipulation of acrylate-based manicure materials, the fact that some consumers end up self-applying these products at home, and the poor training of the general dermatologist on the specific clinical features of contact allergy to acrylates in manicure products (often misdiagnosed as psoriasis and unnecessarily treated with immunosuppressants). Knowledge of the different techniques and materials used allows the clinician to understand the characteristics and distribution of the lesions. In some cases, sensitization to acrylates from manicure, a merely esthetic procedure, has been described to cause contact dermatitis to medical devices containing acrylates.

Summary

Information regarding the risks, preventive measures, protection equipment, and training should be delivered to consumers and professionals respectively; the commercialization of these materials for the general public should be regulated and general dermatology practitioners trained to diagnose and manage these patients more efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Sasseville D. Acrylates in contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2012;23:6–16. This is one of the most complete articles on contact dermatitis acrylates

  2. Horner KL, Anderson B. Acrylates. Dermatitis. 2009;20(4):218–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. • Conde-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Romero L. V. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from anaerobic acrylic sealant. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;18:129–32. This one is the first article published on the topic by Spanish experts on occupational dermatitis.

  4. Sauder MB, Pratt MD. Acrylate systemic contact dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2015;26:235–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giroux L, Pratt MD. Contact dermatitis to incontinency pads in a (met)acrylate allergic patient. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 2002;13:143–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spencer A, Gazzani P, Thompson DA. Acrylate and methacrylate contact allergy and allergic contact disease: a 13-year review. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:157–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA. Allergic contact dermatitis and other dermatosis related to the use of insulin pumps and glucose sensor sets. Piel. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.piel.2019.11.003. This is a review by the authors on the topic of allergic contact reactions from insulin pumps and glucose sensor sets.

  8. • Canizares O. Contact dermatitis due to the acrylic materials used in artificial nails. AMA Arch Derm. 1956;74:141–3.This is the first report on contact dermatitis to acrylates in acrylic manicure materials (acrylic nails).

  9. Van der Voort AM, van Neer JMA. Acrylate-induced nail contact allergy. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:e389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  10. • Constandt L, Hecke E.V, Naeyaert J-M and Goossens A. Screening for contact allergy to artificial nails. Contact Dermatitis 2005;52:73–77. It is a very complete article including a detailed description of the different manicure techniques as well as the main acrylates involved in each type. It shows a high number of cases of contact dermatitis to acrylates in manicure with a high proportion of consumers affected.

  11. • Ramos L, Cabral R, Gonçalo M. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates and methacrylates - a 7-year study. Contact Dermatitis 2014:71:102–107. This article describes a high number of cases of contact dermatitis from acrylates in manicure techniques and evaluates the most frequent allergens involved in an attempt to define the best patch test markers to screen for acrylates allergy.

  12. • Roche E, de la Cuadra J, Alegre V. Sensitization to acrylates caused by artificial acrylic nails: review of 15 cases. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2008;99:788–94. A main article in the Spanish literature on the topic of sensitization to acrylates in artificial nails.

  13. Alcántara-Nicolás FA, Pastor-Nieto MA, Sanchez-Herreros C, Perez-Mesonero R, Melgar-Molero V, Ballano A, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylic nails in a flamenco guitarist. Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66:751–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. •• Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Mercader-García P, Silvestre-Salvador JF. Allergic contact dermatitis from (meth)acrylates in long lasting nail polish. Are we facing a new epidemic in the beauty industry? Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:360–366. This article points out the role of semipermanent nail polish (long lasting nail polish) as the specific technique currently involved in the epidemic of contact dermatitis from acrylates mainly involving beauticians applying manicure. The semipermanent nail polish technique is described in detail as well as the clinical pattern and topographical distribution of the lesions. The efficacy of secondary prevention as well as the ability for the professionals to go on working are evaluated through a telephone survey.

  15. •• Gonçalo M, Pinho A, Agner T, Andersen KE, Bruze M, Diepgen T, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by nail acrylates in Europe. An EECDRG study. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;78(4):254–60. A mutli-center study about allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in Europe.

  16. RaposoI LI, Amaro C, Lobo M, Melo H, Parente J, Pereira T, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by (meth)acrylates in nail cosmetic products in users and nail technicians – a 5-year study. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77:356–9.

  17. Bryson PH, Sirdesai SJ. Colored nail cosmetics and hardeners. In: Draelos ZD, editor. Cosmetic dermatology: products and procedures. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 206–14.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 13th Congress of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD).14–17 September 2016, Manchester United, Kingdom. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75(Suppl 1):3–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12631.

  19. Kanerva L, Lauerma A, Jolanki R, Estlander T. Methyl acrylate: a new sensitizer in nail lacquer. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;33:203–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. •• Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Silvestre-Salvador JF. Allergic contact dermatitis from acrylates in long lasting nail polish. Actas Dermosifilogr. 2018;109(6):508–14. A review on the topic by the authors on the topic of long-lasting nail polish(semi-permanent) as a main cause for acrylates contact dermatitis.

  21. Guarneri F, Borgia F. Novitas in antiquo: magnetic nails. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:376–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Atwater AR, Reeder M. Trends in nail services may cause dermatitis: not your mother’s nail polish. Cutis. 2019;103(6):315–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schoon D. Cosmetic prostheses as artificial nail enhancements. In: Draelos ZD, editor. Cosmetic dermatology: products and procedures. 1st ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 215–21.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Conde-Salazar Gómez L, Díaz Martínez B, Valks R, Gatica ME. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic nails. Piel. 2004;19(5):261–4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Ruíz-González I, Giménez-Arnau A, González-Pérez R, Heras-Mendaza F, et al. Multicentric research to evaluate the contact sensitization from acrylates and methacrylates in nail aesthetic procedures in beauticians and consumers as well as in other sources in Spain. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79(Suppl.1):94–5 (P-092).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Ruíz-González I, Giménez-Arnau A, González-Pérez R, Heras-Mendaza F, et al. Systematically patch testing hydroxyethyl methacrylate, hydroxypropyl methacrylate and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate: a multicentre approach in Spain. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79(Suppl.1):95 (P-093).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rolls S, Chowdhury MM, Cooper S, Cousen P, Flynn AM, Ghaffar SA, et al. Recommendation to include hydroxyethyl (meth)acrylate in the British Baseline Patch Test Series. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(4):811–7.

  28. Stingeni L, Tramontana M, Bianchi L, Foti C, Patruno C, Gallo R, et al. Contact sensitivity to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in consecutive patients: a 1-year multicentre SIDAPA study. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:216–8.

  29. Havmose M, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, Johansen JD. Contact allergy to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:229–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Goon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Goh CL, Soo-Quee Koh D, Isaksson M. Screening for acrylate/methacrylate allergy in the baseline series: our experience in Sweden and Singapore. Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59:307–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dahlin J, Berne B, Dunér K, Hosseiny S, Matura M, Nyman G, et al. Several cases of undesirable effects caused by methacrylate ultraviolet-curing nail polish for non-professional use. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;75:151–6.

  32. Scheers C, André J, Negulescu M, et al. Recurrent cheilitis and lip oedema caused by (meth)acrylates present in ultraviolet-curable nail lacquer. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:337–46.

    Google Scholar 

  33. •• Gatica-Ortega ME, Pastor-Nieto MA, Gil-redondo R, Martínez-Lorenzo ER, Schöendroff-Ortega C. Non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by long-lasting nail polish kits for home use: 'the tip of the iceberg'. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;78:261–265. A series of cases of contact dermatitis from acrylates in long-lasting nail polish (semi-permanent) kits for home use by the authors.

  34. Chen AF, Chimento SM, Hu S, Sanchez M, Zaiac M, Tosti A. Nail damage from gel polish manicure. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012;11:27–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. García-Gil MF, Briñez Giraldo T, Garcés-Sotillos MM. Multiple subungual splinter haemorrhages simulating a systemic disease in a patient allergic to acrylates. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:262–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tammaro A, Narcisi A, Abruzzese C, Cortesi G, Orsini D, Giulianelli V, et al. Fingertip dermatitis: a spy for psoriasis. Int Wound J. 2016;13(5):1032–3.

  37. Paley K, English JC 3rd, Zirwas MJ. Pterygium inversum unguis secondary to acrylate allergy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(2 Suppl):S53–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. McCarthy S, Flynn A, Bennett M, Bourke JF. It’s not lupus, it’s your nails! Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80:67–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vaccaro M, Guarneri F, Barbuzza O, Cannavó SP. Airborne contact dermatitis and asthma in a nail art operator. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014;27(1):137–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Alves F, Morgado F, Ramos L, Gonçalo M. Hand eczema from nail (meth)acrylates in an 11-year-old child. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:5.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Romita P, Foti C, Barlusconi C, Hansel K, Tramontana M, Stingeni L. Contact allergy to (meth) acrylates in gel nail polish in a child: an emerging risk for children. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;83:39–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher AA, Baran RL. Adverse reactions to acrylate sculptured nails with particular reference to prolonged paresthesia. Am J Contact Dermat. 1991;2:38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fisher AA. Permanent loss of fingernails due to allergic reaction to an acrylic nail preparation: a sixteen-year follow-up study. Cutis. 1989;43:404–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Slodownik D, Williams JD, Tate BJ. Prolonged paresthesia due to sculptured acrylic nails. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(5):298–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Carr C, Liu M, Goff HW. Acrylate allergic contact dermatitis-induced lichen planus of the nail. Dermatitis. 2019;30(3):233–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Isaksson M, Siemund I, Bruze M. Allergic contact dermatitis from ethylcyanoacrylate in an office worker with artificial nails led to months of sick leave. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(5):346–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dickison P, Smith SD. Itching for nail fashion: chronic urticaria and chronic hand dermatitis secondary to acrylate and methacrylate allergy in gel nail varnish. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2018;43(1):50–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fernández-Canga P, Sánchez-Sambucety P, Valladares-Narganes LM, Varas-Meis E, Rodríguez-Prieto MA. Lymphomatoid contact dermatitis induced by acrylates mimicking lymphomatoid papulosis. Dermatitis. 2018;29(3):167–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Marrero-Alemán G, Sabater-Abad J, Miquel FJ, Boix-Vilanova J, Mestre Bauzá F, Borrego L. Allergic contact dermatitis to (meth)acrylates involving nail technicians and users: prognosis and differential diagnosis. Allergy. 2019;74(7):1386–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Pastor-Nieto MA, Gatica-Ortega ME. Alcántara-Nicolás, Melgar-Molero V, Ballano-Ruiz A, Lorente-Luna M et al. Leucoderma following contact dermatitis from artificial nails. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;70(Suppl. 1):42–5 (212).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Alamri A, Lill D, Summer B, Thomas P, Thomas B, Oppel E. Artificial nail wearing: unexpected elicitor of allergic contact dermatitis, oral lichen planus and risky arthroplasty. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81:210–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Jurado-Palomo J, Caballero T, Fernández-Nieto M, Quirce S. Occupational asthma caused by artificial cyanoacrylate fingernails. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009;102(5):440–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sauni R, Kauppi P, Alanko K, Henriks-Eckerman ML, Tuppurainen M, Hannu T. Occupational asthma caused by sculptured nails containing methacrylates. Am J Ind Med. 2008;51(12):968–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Torres MC, Linares T, Hernandez MD. Acrylates induced rhinitis and contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(2):114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Suojalehto H, Suuronen K, Cullinan P, Lindström I, Sastre J, Walusiak-Skorupa J, et al. Phenotyping occupational asthma caused by acrylates in a multicenter cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(3):971–979.e1.

  56. Goon AT, Bruze M, Zimerson E, Sörensen Ö, Goh CL, Koh D, et al. Variation in allergen content over time of acrylates/ methacrylates in patch test preparation. Br J Dermatol. 2011;64:116–24.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Uter W, Geier J. Contact allergy to acrylates and methacrylates in consumers and nail artists – data of the Information Network of Department of Dermatology 2004–2013. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72:224–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kanerva L, Estlander T. Contact leukoderma caused by patch testing with dental acrylics. Am J Contact Dermat. 1998;9:196–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kwok C, Wilkinson M, Sommer S. A rare case of acquired leukoderma following patch testing with an acrylate series. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;64:292–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Casse V, Salmon-Ehr V, Mohn C, Kalis B. Chronic depigmentation due to positive patch tests for methacrylate derivatives. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1998;125:56–7.

  61. Panasoff J. Leukoderma as a side-effect of patch testing with acrylates: A case report. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:403–404.

  62. Wingfield Digby SS, Thyssen JP. How should we advise patients with allergic contact dermatitis caused by (meth-)acrylates about future dental work? Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(2):116–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Quaade AS, Hald M, Johansen JD. Allergic contact stomatitis caused by (meth)acrylates in an occlusal splint. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:112–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Patel V, Allen D, Morley AM, Frcophth RM. Features and management of an acute allergic response to acrylic ocular prostheses. Orbit. 2009;28(6):339–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kiec-Swierczynska M, Krecisz B, Chomiczewska-Skora D. Occupational contact dermatitis to acrylates in a manicurist. Occup Med (Lond). 2013;63(5):380–2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Liu T, Wan J, McKenna RA, Jackson OA, Treat JR. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by Dermabond in a paediatric patient undergoing skin surgery. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80:61–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Lake N, Barlow B, Toledano J, Valentine J, McDonald L. Contact dermatitis reaction to 2-octyl cyanoacrylate following 3 orthopedic procedures. Orthopedics. 2018;41(2):e289–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Jung P, Jarisch R, Hemm W. Hypersensitivity from dental acrylates in a patient previously sensitized to artificial. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53:119–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Goulding JM, Finch TM. Acrylates tooth and nail: coexistent allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates present in desensitizing dental swabs and artificial fingernails. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65:47–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yiannias JA, el-Azhary RA, Hand JH, et al. Relevant contact sensitivities in patients with the diagnosis of oral lichen planus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(2 pt 1):177–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Haughton AM, Belsito DV. Acrylate allergy induced by acrylic nails resulting in prosthesis failure. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(Suppl. 5):S123–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Mestach L, Huygens S, Goossens A, Gilissen L. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic-based medical dressings and adhesives. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79:81–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Corazza M, Mantovani L, Zedde P, Forconi R, Scuderi V, Borghi A. A case of allergic contact dermatitis to (meth)acrylates in ECG electrodes. Contact Dermatitis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13570.

  74. Navarro-Triviño FJ, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-ethylhexyl acrylate in a rivastigmine transdermal therapeutic system. Contact Dermatitis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13551.

  75. Dittmar D, Dahlin J, Persson C, Schuttelaar ML. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylic acid used in transcutaneous electrical nervous stimulation. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77(6):409–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Watts TJ, Thursfield D, Haque R. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by VenaSeal tissue adhesive. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80:391–3.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Navarro-Triviño FJ, Cuenca-Manteca J, Ruiz-Villaverde R. Allergic contact dermatitis with systemic symptoms caused by VenaSeal. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:185–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Sinha KR, Duckwiler G, Rootman DB. Urticarial reaction following endovascular embolization of an orbital arteriovenous malformation (AVM) with n-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA) glue. Interv Neuroradiol. 2017;23(6):666–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Meding B, Ringdahl A. Allergic contact dermatitis from the earmolds of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 1992;13(2):122–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Sood A, Taylor JS. Allergic contact dermatitis from hearing aid materials. Dermatitis. 2004;15(1):48–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Di Berardino F, Pigatto P, Ambrosetti U, Cesarani A. Allergic contact dermatitis to hearing aids: literature and case reports. Contact Dermatitis. 2009;60(5):291–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Gautschi O, Schlett C, Fournier JY, Cadosch D. Laboratory confirmed polymethyl-methacrylate (Palacos®)-hypersensitivity after cranioplasty. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112:915–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Ródenas-Herranz T, Navarro-Triviño FJ, Linares-González L, Ruiz-Villaverde R, Brufau-Redondo C, Mercader-García P. Acrylate allergic contact dermatitis caused by hair prosthesis fixative. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82:62–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Sato M, Inomata N, Aihara M. A case of contact dermatitis syndrome caused by Dermabond®, followed by contact dermatitis caused by false eyelash glue and Aron Alpha® glue: possibility of cross-reactions among cyanoacrylates. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;77(6):414–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lucidarme N, Aerts O, Roelandts R, Goossens A. Hydroxyethyl acrylate: a potential allergen in cosmetic creams? Contact Dermatitis. 2008;59(5):321–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mukaijo J, Inomata N, Higashihira M, Koh N, Togashi Y, Asai C, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by 2-hydroxyethyl acrylate in a moisturizing face pack in a handmade acrylic accessory enthusiast. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79:383–5.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dermatology Department, University Hospital Complex of Toledo, Carretera de Cobisa s/n, 45071, Toledo, Spain

    María-Elena Gatica-Ortega

  2. Dermatology Department, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain

    María-Antonia Pastor-Nieto

  3. Alcalá de Henares University, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

    María-Antonia Pastor-Nieto

Authors
  1. María-Elena Gatica-Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. María-Antonia Pastor-Nieto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María-Elena Gatica-Ortega.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

María-Elena Gatica-Ortega declares that she has no conflict of interest and María-Antonia Pastor-Nieto declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Contact Dermatitis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gatica-Ortega, ME., Pastor-Nieto, MA. The Present and Future Burden of Contact Dermatitis from Acrylates in Manicure. Curr Treat Options Allergy 7, 291–311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-020-00272-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40521-020-00272-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation