How Can We Influence the Performance of Drug Challenge in Future Treatment
Drug provocation tests are assumed to be the gold standard of drug allergy workup by ensuring the most objective results in clinical observation irrespective of the underlying mechanism of the reaction. Despite its some disadvantages, it is still one of the cornerstones of the drug allergy diagnosis. In this review, new methods for improving diagnostic accuracy of drug provocation tests will be discussed. In this sense, extended challenges are recently shown to have better outcome especially in diagnosing non-immediate reactions due to antibiotics. In children with non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions, provocation tests are becoming to take place of skin tests with promising results. Furthermore, drug provocation tests have been shown to prevent unnecessary desensitization protocols in newly developed drugs such as biological agents. These new data on diagnostic performance of drug provocation test seem to influence the future treatments in patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions.
KeywordsDrug provocation tests Extended provocation Drug allergy Non-immediate reactions Beta-lactams
Compliance With Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Aslı Gelincik declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Gülfem E. Celik declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as• Of importance •• Of major importance
- 2.Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters; American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology; Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Drug allergy: an updated practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2010;105(4):259–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.•Brockow K, Garvey LH, Aberer W, Atanaskovic-Markovic M, Barbaud A, Bilo MB, et al. Skin test concentrations for systemically administered drugs—an ENDA/EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group position paper. Allergy. 2013;68(6):702–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12142. Principals of drug skin tests are mentioned in detail in this review.
- 6.•Aberer W, Bircher A, Romano A, Blanca M, Campi P, Fernandez J, et al. Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations. Allergy. 2003;58(9):854–63. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00279.x. Principals of DPTs are outlined in this review.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.•Soyer O, Sahiner UM, Sekerel BE. Pro and contra: provocation tests in drug hypersensitivity. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(7):1437. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18071437. Overview of considerations in DPT.
- 9.••Gomes ER, Brockow K, Kuyucu S, Saretta F, Mori F, Blanca-Lopez N, et al. Drug hypersensitivity in children: report from the pediatric task force of the EAACI Drug Allergy Interest Group. Allergy. 2016;71(2):149–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12774. Significance of DPT in pediatric population and its value without prior skin testing in non-immediate mild cutaneous reactions in children are outlined.
- 10.Demir S, Gelincik A, Akdeniz N, Aktas-Cetin E, Olgac M, Unal D, et al. Usefulness of in vivo and in vitro diagnostic tests in the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones and in the evaluation of cross-reactivity: a comprehensive study including the latest quinolone gemifloxacin. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2017;9(4):347–59. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2017.9.4.347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.••Alvarez-Cuesta E, Madrigal-Burgaleta R, Angel-Pereira D, Urena-Tavera A, Zamora-Verduga M, Lopez-Gonzalez P, et al. Delving into cornerstones of hypersensitivity to antineoplatic and biological agents: value of diagnostic tools prior to desensitization. Allergy. 2015;70(7):784–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12620. This study presented the importance of DPT in preventing unnecessary desensitizations for hypersensitivity reactions due to chemotherapeutic drugs and biological agents.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Çapanoglu M, Vezir E, Misirlioglu ED, Guvenir H, Buyuktiryaki B, Toyran M, et al. Additional provocation testing in patients with negative provocation test results with β-lactam antibiotics. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016;116(1):82–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2015.10.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Lezmi G, Alrowaishdi F, Bados-Albiero A, Scheinmann P, de Blic J, Ponvert C. Non-immediate-reading skin tests and prolonged challenges in non-immediate hypersensitivity to beta-lactams in children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.12826.
- 24.Mill C, Primeau MN, Medoff E, Lejtenyi C, O'Keefe A, Netchiporouk E, et al. Assessing the diagnostic properties of a graded oral provocation challenge for the diagnosis of immediate and nonimmediate reactions to amoxicillin in children. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(6):e160033. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.0033.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar