Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Instrumental evaluation of gait smoothness and history of falling in older persons: results from an exploratory case–control study

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gait smoothness, perceived when a person walks continuously and uninterruptedly, is associated with an undisrupted gait pattern, good sensorimotor control, and a lower risk of falling. The spectral arc length (SPARC) is a quantitative metric proposed for the evaluation of movement smoothness from the signal obtained by wearable sensors. In this small exploratory case–control study, older persons with and without a history of injurious falls underwent a turn-test while wearing an accelerometer: gait smoothness was estimated by calculating SPARC during the straight and turning phases. Cases seemed to exhibit lower SPARC values during the turning phase, in comparison with control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data availability

Data are available upon request to the corresponding authors. Each request will be evaluated by all co-authors and the local ethical committee.

References

  1. Montero-Odasso MM (2016) Falls as a geriatric syndrome: mechanisms and risk identification. In: Duque G, Kiel DP, eds. Osteoporosis in Older Persons. Springer International Publishing; https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25976-5_10

  2. Thomas E, Battaglia G, Patti A et al (2019) Physical activity programs for balance and fall prevention in elderly: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000016218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Creaby MW, Cole MH (2018) Gait characteristics and falls in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 57:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.07.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Figueiredo AI, Balbinot G, Brauner FO et al (2020) SPARC metrics provide mobility smoothness assessment in oldest-old with and without a history of falls: a case control study. Front Physiol 11:540. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00540

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brach JS, McGurl D, Wert D et al (2011) Validation of a measure of smoothness of walking. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66:136–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glq170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rispens SM, van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M et al (2015) Identification of fall risk predictors in daily life measurements: gait characteristics’ reliability and association with self-reported fall history. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29:54–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314532031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Schooten KS, Pijnappels M, Rispens SM, et al. (2016) Daily-life gait quality as predictor of falls in older people: a 1-year prospective cohort study. Glasauer S, ed. PLOS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158623

  8. Melendez-Calderon A, Shirota C, Balasubramanian S (2021) Estimating movement smoothness from inertial measurement units. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.558771

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Balasubramanian S, Melendez-Calderon A, Burdet E (2012) A robust and sensitive metric for quantifying movement smoothness. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59:2126–2136. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2011.2179545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beauchet O, Allali G, Sekhon H et al (2017) Guidelines for assessment of gait and reference values for spatiotemporal gait parameters in older adults: the biomathics and canadian gait consortiums initiative. Front Hum Neurosci 11:353. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck Y, Herman T, Brozgol M et al (2018) SPARC: a new approach to quantifying gait smoothness in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 15:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0398-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Balasubramanian S. SPARC. Published online October 22, 2021. Accessed December 3, 2021. https://github.com/siva82kb/SPARC/blob/3650934f5bc9ad21c7d59dcdb6ccd249c462b3e4/scripts/smoothness.py

  13. Pinto C, Schuch CP, Balbinot G et al (2019) Movement smoothness during a functional mobility task in subjects with Parkinson’s disease and freezing of gait - an analysis using inertial measurement units. J Neuroengineering Rehabil 16:110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0579-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen TY, Peronto CL, Edwards JD (2012) Cognitive function as a prospective predictor of falls. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 67:720–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs052

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hase K, Stein RB (1999) Turning strategies during human walking. J Neurophysiol 81:2914–2922. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.81.6.2914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taylor MJD, Dabnichki P, Strike SC (2005) A three-dimensional biomechanical comparison between turning strategies during the stance phase of walking. Hum Mov Sci 24:558–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.07.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the work: AZ, NFL, AM. Data collection: DL, CF, AZ. Data analysis: AZ, NFL. Interpretation of the results: AZ, AM, NFL. Drafting the article: AZ. Critical revision of the manuscript: all co-authors. Final approval of the manuscript: all co-authors. All the authors fulfill the ICMJE criteria for authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Zucchelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that no organizations have attempted to influence the study or the writing of the manuscript. They have had no financial relationships in the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in influencing the submitted work and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. BTS-bioengineering had no role in the design of the study, the collection or the analysis of data, the interpretation of the results, nor the drafting of the article.

Statement of human and animal rights

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia (Brescia, Italy). An informed consent form was signed by all study participants. This study was carried out in keeping with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

The informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zucchelli, A., Lucente, D., Filippini, C. et al. Instrumental evaluation of gait smoothness and history of falling in older persons: results from an exploratory case–control study. Aging Clin Exp Res 35, 1357–1361 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02403-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-023-02403-0

Keywords

Navigation