Understanding the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions to improve cognitive function in older adults with MCI and identifying the best intervention may help inform ideas for future RCT studies and clinical decision-making.
The main focus of this study was to assess the comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive function in older adults with MCI and to rank the interventions.
RCT studies until September 2022 were searched from six databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and CINAHL. The risk of bias in eligible trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Both pairwise and network meta-analyses were used, and pooled effect sizes were reported using SMD and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
A total of 28 RCT studies were included in this study, pooling 18 categories of nonpharmacological interventions. MBE (mind–body exercise) (SMD (standard mean difference): 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.41, P = 0.004), DTE (dual-task exercise) (SMD: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.09–1.13, P = 0.02), PE (physical exercise) (SMD: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.04–1.12, P = 0.03) may be effective in improving cognitive function in older adults with MCI. Acupressure + CT (cognitive training) was the top-ranked intervention among all interventions. No greater benefits of MA (mindful awareness) on cognitive function were found.
Overall, nonpharmacological interventions significantly improved cognitive function in older adults with MCI. Acupressure + CT(cognitive training) was the most effective intervention for managing cognitive impairment. Future studies with high quality and large sample size RCT studies are needed to confirm our results.
With the extension of life expectancy, chronic health problems related to aging have become a priority for the cause of healthy aging. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a heterogenous clinical syndrome, is common among the elderly over 60 years old , with an estimated prevalence of 16–20% . It is characterized by subjective cognitive dysfunction and no significant impairment of instrumental activities in daily life (ADL) . MCI is considered the intermediate stage from normal aging to dementia, and patients with MCI are at high risk of dementia . It is reported that about 5–17% of patients with mild cognitive impairment are diagnosed with clinical dementia yearly . Dementia is a serious social issue. The extended care of dementia patients will cause a significant burden on the family, the community and the national healthcare system . Consequently, developing approaches to improve cognitive function in older adults is the focus of work in research.
As no strong evidence exists that medicine is effective for dementia-related cognitive impairment , the management of MCI is emerging as a global public health challenge. Nonpharmacological interventions are emerging as a research hotspot, which focus on cognitive compensation and lifestyle changes. Early nonpharmacological interventions for MCI patients can improve cognitive function, improve quality of life, and delay their progression to dementia . The effectiveness of multiple nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive function in patients with MCI has been proved in previous randomized controlled trials, such as physical exercise, cognitive training and Taiji [9, 10]. These interventions have been free of adverse effects compared to pharmacological therapies and are widely used in the adjunctive treatment of cognitive function in patients with MCI. However, although previous conventional pairwise meta-analyses have investigated the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions for cognitive function in patients with MCI [11, 9], it does not allow for indirect comparisons of data. The optimal option for nonpharmacological interventions for MCI is still unclear, making decision-making difficult for physicians.
Network meta‐analysis (NMA) is a statistical method that compares one intervention with another based on head to head data from randomized controlled studies and ranks them. The advantages of network models are that they integrate direct and indirect evidence and analyze the efficacy of these interventions rather than simply investigating whether each intervention is more effective than placebo or usual care. Hence, this systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the comparative effects of nonpharmacological interventions for global cognitive function and to rank the interventions for adults aged 60 years and over with MCI.
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Network Meta-Analyses (PRISMA-NMA) was used to guide this systematic review and network meta-analysis. A PRISMA checklist was provided in the supplementary file. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CDR 42022369607).
The eligible criteria in this review was described via the PICOS framework
P: patients with MCI (amnestic MCI and non-amnestic MCI) and 60 years old and above. Patients with psychiatric, traumatic brain injury, neurological diseases, and alcohol abuse were excluded. I: nonpharmacological interventions, such as exercise, cognitive training, and Taiji. C: the control group can be inactive or active. O: studies are required to report nonpharmacological interventions’ effects on global cognitive function. S: this review only included randomized controlled studies.
Studies were excluded for four reasons: (1) full text was inaccessible; (2) necessary data were not acquired; (3) repeated published literature; (4) published in non-English languages.
We systematically searched six electronic databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO and CINAHL, from inception until September 2022. The retrieval strategy adopted the combination of subject terms and free words to acquire better retrieval results. The specific retrieval strategy was shown in the supplemental file. In addition, we retrieved reference sections of all studies identified to access all relevant literature. Based on the available studies, we classified the interventions into 18 categories: (1) health education (HE), (2) usual care (care with nursing staff, UC), (3) as usual, (4) stretching, (5) social activity, (6) physical exercise (single-format exercise, PE), (7) multicomponent intervention (MI), (8) risk factor modification (RFM), (9) cognitive training (CT), (10) mind–body exercise (MBE), (11) dual-task exercise (DTE), (12) multicomponent exercise (ME), (13) multicomponent exercise combined cognitive training (ME + CT), (14) acupressure, (15) acupressure combined cognitive training (acupressure + CT), (16) visual art therapy, (17) mindful awareness (MA), and (18) music.
This review followed the literature screening process. After removing duplicate literature, researchers (XY L, GP W) independently read the title and abstract according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and then reviewed the remaining literature. Finally, qualified literature was screened out. The original author would be contacted if essential data were missing or the full text was unavailable. Disputes during the screening process were discussed with a third researcher (YJ C).
Two review authors (XY L, GP W) independently assessed the risk of bias in included studies using Cochrane’s ‘Risk of bias’ tool, which included five domains: selection bias (random sequence generation and allocation sequence concealment), performance bias (blinding of participants and personnel), detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment), attrition bias (incomplete outcome data), reporting bias (selective reporting) and other bias. Each domain can be rated as “low risk of bias,” “high risk of bias” or “unclear risk of bias”. Differences of opinion were resolved by consulting a third review author (YJ C). In addition, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to assess the quality of the evidence, which can be of high, moderate, low or very low.
Data extraction was performed by two review authors (XY L and GP W). A unified Excel form was used to extract information, including the first author, year, country, age, gender (female), study site, treatment strategy, number of tread patients and study duration.
A pairwise meta-analysis of comparisons reported in two or more was done by RevMan 5.4 software. The mean change and standard deviation were used to analyze cognitive function changes. If these were not reported, we would calculate them based on means and standard deviation for baseline and post-intervention. The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions described the calculation methods. The random-effects model was used in pairwise meta-analysis. Due to different assessment tools, the pooled effect size was reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and a corresponding 95% confidence interval.
We performed a Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis to combine direct and indirect evidence using Stata 15.1 software. Comparative relationships between interventions were analyzed by drawing a network geometry plot. The consistency hypothesis test was analyzed across global consistency and local consistency. If P > 0.05, the consistency model is used. SMD and corresponding 95% confidence interval were reported to assess the comparative effectiveness of interventions. τ2 assessed heterogeneity among all comparisons. An τ2 of 0.04 was considered a low heterogeneity; 0.16, a moderate heterogeneity; and 0.36, a large heterogeneity . The surface under the cumulative ranking curve analysis (SUCRA) was used to estimate the ranked probability of comparing efficacy between different interventions. SUCRA values range from 0% to 100%, and higher SUCRA values indicate better intervention performance . A comparison-adjusted funnel plot was also produced to explore small-study effects and publication bias. Data points were symmetrically distributed around the centerline, and the auxiliary correction line was perpendicular to the center line, indicating no published deviation in this review.
In this review, a total of 3636 studies were initially retrieved (Fig. 1). After the removal of duplicates, 2012 studies were left for examination. One hundred and one studies remained after reading titles and abstracts. Finally, 28 studies were enrolled in this review based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The characteristics of the studies are summarized in Table 1. A total of 28 randomized controlled studies (21 two-arm trials, 5 three-arm trials, and 2 four-arm trials) were included in this review, which was from ten countries, with 13 from China [14, 29,30,31,16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26], 4 from Japan [27,28,29,30], 3 from Korea [31,32,33], 2 from Spain [34, 35], 2 from Brazil [36, 37], and 1 each from America , Tanzania , Singapore , and Turkey . Of these, the earliest study was published in 2010. Fifteen studies investigated the effects of HE, 4 studies investigated the impact of UC, 4 studies investigated the effects of as usual, 3 studies investigated the effects of stretching, 6 studies investigated the impact of PE, 5 studies investigated the effects of MI, 5 studies investigated the effects of CT, 6 studies investigated the impact of MBE, 3 studies investigated the effects of DTE, 6 studies investigated the effects of ME, and 1 study investigated the impact of social activity, acupressure, RFM, acupressure + CT, ME + CT, visual art therapy, MA and music, respectively. Inactive control groups included health education, as usual, and usual care. Health education was the most frequently investigated intervention and was included in 15 studies. Duration time of the studies ranged from 6 weeks to 24 months, and 12 weeks in six studies, 6 months in six studies, 3 months in four studies, 1 year in three studies, 6 weeks in two studies, 40 weeks in two studies, 16 weeks in one study, 8 weeks in one study, 10 weeks in one study, 20 weeks in one study and 24 months in one study. Of a total of 3319 patients over 60 years, there were 1924 females. They were drawn from the community in 16 studies, hospitals in 3, and aged service institutions in 9 studies.
Risk of bias
The risk of bias in these enrolled studies is shown in Fig. 2. Regarding these studies, 82% (23/28) studies did not report the method of random sequence generation. 82% (23/28) of studies did not describe allocation concealment methods. All participants and those delivering the intervention were aware of the group allocation, and it was difficult for them to be blinded. Only 21% (6/28) of the studies had a low risk of performance and detection bias. Nearly half of the proportion (32%, 9/28) in these studies was at a high risk of attrition bias, while 61% (11/28) were at low risk of reporting bias. We cannot judge if other biases exist due to insufficient information.
In the pairwise meta-analysis, we used a random-effects model to assess the direct comparative effects of nonpharmaceutical interventions on cognitive function. The results were presented in a forest plot (Fig. 3). Only interventions on MI (5 studies), CT (5 studies), ME (6 studies), MBE (6 studies), DTE (3 studies), and PE (6 studies) were reported in two or more studies. Pooled results showed that the improvement of MBE (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.41, P = 0.004), DTE (SMD: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.09–1.13, P = 0.02), PE (SMD: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.04–1.12, P = 0.03) was better in intervention group than that of control group. We further analyzed the certainty of evidence (Supplementary File) for all outcomes. Evidence certainty was considered low regarding CT vs HE, acupressure + CT vs HE, visual art therapy vs HE, MA vs HE, music vs HE, RFM vs HE, acupressure vs acupressure + CT, music vs MBE, as usual vs MBE, PE vs MBE, DTE vs stretching, ME + CT vs ME, ME vs as usual, social activity vs CT and RFM vs MI, which was closely related to the quality of the original study. While the certainty of evidence for PE vs HE, acupressure vs HE, acupressure + CT vs CT, ME vs CT, ME + CT vs CT, CT vs UC, acupressure vs CT, DTE vs as usual, DTE vs PE and ME vs UC was considered moderate, the certainty of evidence for other outcomes was considered very low.
In the network meta-analysis, the network geometry plot is displayed in Fig. 4, representing the interactions among the studies included in this network meta-analysis. The nodes in the network geometry plot represented different interventions, and the nodes and connections were weighted according to the number of studies containing direct comparative interventions. The larger the node, the more times it occurs in the corresponding direct comparison. The thicker the connection, the greater is the number of direct pairwise comparisons. In terms of consistency, we simultaneously applied global and local consistency analyses to evaluate the consistency between the direct and indirect evidence correctly. No statistical differences were found (global consistency test: Chi-square = 1.84, P = 0.9974; local consistency test: all P > 0.05). The network forest plot (Supplementary file) displayed the effect sizes of all interventions. The pooled effect of each study in the comparison set was expressed in blue, which displayed the result of the inconsistent model. In contrast, the pooled total effects of interventions in the comparison set were expressed in red, which displayed the result of a consistent model. The P value displayed in the lower-left corner of the figure was 0.999, >0.5. This also meant that the consistency model was supported. Table 2 summarizes this network meta-analysis's results in improving global cognitive function in older patients with MCI. These results indicated that cognitive function in elderly MCI participants was significantly improved in acupressure + CT compared with that in CT (SMD: 1.66, 95%CI: 0.24–3.08), ME + CT (SMD: 1.89, 95%CI: 0.02–3.77), social activity (SMD: 1.93, 95%CI: 0.06–3.81), UC (SMD: 2.07, 95%CI: 0.49–3.65), ME (SMD: 2.39, 95%CI: 0.89–3.90), MI (SMD: 2.53, 95%CI: 0.93–4.14), DTE (SMD: 2.80, 95%CI: 1.01–4.58), PE (SMD: 2.80, 95%CI: 1.19–4.42), music (SMD: 3.01, 95%CI: 1.04–4.99), RFM (SMD: 3.16, 95%CI: 0.96–5.36), MBE (SMD: 3.07, 95%CI: 1.40–4.74), MA (SMD: 1.66, 95%CI: 0.24–3.08), HE (SMD: 3.33, 95%CI: 1.48–5.19), visual art therapy (SMD: 3.38, 95%CI: 1.93–4.82) and as usual (SMD: 3.69, 95%CI: 1.59–5.80). Compared to MA, there were significant improvements in acupressure + CT (SMD: 1.66, 95%CI: 0.24–3.08), acupressure (SMD: 1.90, 95%CI: 0.49–3.31), CT (SMD: 1.71, 95%CI: 0.69–2.74), ME + CT (SMD: 1.48, 95%CI: 0.01–2.96), UC (SMD: 1.31, 95%CI: 0.14–2.47), ME (SMD: 0.98, 95%CI: 0.24–1.72), MI (SMD: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.14–1.55). Compared to HE, there were significant improvements in acupressure + CT (SMD: 3.33, 95%CI: 1.48–5.19), acupressure (SMD: 1.86, 95%CI: 0.03–3.69), CT (SMD: 1.67, 95%CI: 0.13–3.21). Compared to MBE, there were significant improvements in acupressure + CT (SMD: 3.07, 95%CI: 1.40–4.74), CT (SMD: 1.41, 95%CI: 0.09–2.72). We ranked the superiority of all interventions by SCURA. As shown in Fig. 5, the probability of acupressure + CT being the best intervention mode was 93.6%. The surface area of SCURA for the intervention mode acupressure + CT reached nearly 100%, which also supported that this intervention mode was optimal. Acupressure + CT was followed by acupressure, CT, ME + CT, social activity, UC, ME, MI, DTE, PE, music, RFM, MBE, visual art therapy, stretching, HE, MA, and as usual. Publication bias for included studies was detected by comparison-adjusted funnel plot (Fig. 6), which was basically symmetrical. The adjusted auxiliary line was almost perpendicular to the centerline, indicating a limited small sample effect and publication bias in included studies.
This systematic review and network meta-analysis was performed based on 28 randomized controlled studies to evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive function in adults aged over 60 years with MCI. The interventions included CT, PE, MI, RFM, MBE, DTE, ME, MA, ME + CT, stretching, social activity, acupressure, acupressure + CT, visual art therapy, and music. To the best of our knowledge, this review was the most comprehensive network meta-analysis of nonpharmacological interventions for older adults with MCI.
Summary of evidence
In the pairwise meta-analysis, the pooled effect size showed that nonpharmacological interventions could significantly improve cognitive function for patients with MCI, which was consistent with previous evidence . Improvements in cognitive performance for the MBE [31, 43,44,45, 16, 18, 22], DTE [45, 16, 18, 33] and PE [41, 31, 32, 33, 21, 22] group were more significant than that of the control groups. However, this result must be viewed with caution because of the limited number of studies and the large heterogeneity. In addition, since some of the intervention types, including stretching, social activity, acupressure, RFM, acupressure + CT, ME + CT, visual art therapy, MA and music, were reported in only one study, we could not judge their pooled direct effects on cognitive function in elderly MCI patients. However, they proved to be significant in the original research. This was a common inherent limitation of pairwise meta-analysis.
With the deepening of medical research, interventions have gradually diversified. In the face of multiple interventions, pairwise meta-analysis cannot provide effective methodological support for selecting optimal interventions due to the limitation of pairwise comparisons. Network meta-analysis combined all direct and indirect evidence, thus improving precision and fully respecting randomization . This meant that multiple intervention approaches for the metric of interest could be compared simultaneously and ranked for superiority, even if not all possible comparisons have been made. Although previous studies synthesized the results of cognitive interventions for patients with MCI, most of them focused on directly comparing the interventions with usual care or as usual [11, 47] and did not take into account the special characteristics of the elderly individuals. Our study used network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions, and the intervention type of acupressure + CT was ranked as the most effective intervention in this review.
Acupressure was an important part of traditional Chinese medicine, which was guided by traditional Chinese medical theory, based on the doctrine of meridians and acupoints, with massage as the primary treatment used to prevent and treat diseases. Acupressure can relax muscles, relieve fatigue, regulate body functions, and improve human immunity, unblocking meridians, balance yin and yang, and prolong life . Acupressure acts as a complementary and alternative medical therapy. It was reported that acupressure could be an effective approach to improve sleep quality, psychological distress and physical function and relieve pain in the elderly [48,49,50]. However, there were limited studies using acupressure to improve cognitive function in individuals with cognitive impairment. A previous study noted that acupressure was effective in improving cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury compared to a placebo group . The mechanism of action of acupressure to improve cognitive function remained unclear. From a traditional Chinese medicine perspective, Qi deficiency may be the cause of MCI in the elderly . Acupressure can stimulate the relevant meridians to maintain the balance of Qi in the body . From the perspective of modern medicine, this may be related to acupressure stimulating the transmission of signals in nerve pathways. The stress and cognitive functioning model may explain this conjecture. This model stated that stress can affect cognition in a variety of ways and that chronic exposure to stress can lead to neuronal loss, particularly in the hippocampus . Recent studies have also pointed to stress-induced cortisol arousal as a potential marker of cognitive impairment . In other words, acupressure works by relieving individual stress to reduce its damage to brain function. Acupressure is noninvasive and can be performed by laypersons regardless of equipment conditions, which is cost-effective for older adults with MCI and can be taught to caregivers.
CT has attracted considerable attention as a safe, relatively inexpensive, and scalable intervention. CT refers to repeated standardized exercises in specific cognitive areas to establish or restore cognitive reserves, compensate for brain damage and improve cognitive function .Nerves are plastic, which means that they can be stimulated by external environment, experience and other factors to have neural structure and function remodeling. Animal and human studies have shown that the sensory system of the cerebral cortex can be improved by learning and practicing tasks, while brain changes in cortical areas mediate cognitive improvement, and task-specific training also increases gray matter volume and delays cognitive decline . There have been numerous studies exploring the effects of CT on cognitive function in older adults, with mixed results [58, 59], but few studies have demonstrated CT to be effective in individuals with low baseline cognitive levels . Our network meta-analysis found that CT's effect on improving cognitive function was significant only when compared to the MBE, HE, MA, and as-usual group. This suggested that the advantages of CT in elderly individuals with MCI were not prominent. A recent study also noted that CT has shown no significant benefit in improving cognitive function in older adults and that other more rational practices should be adopted to enhance cognitive performance . In recent years, there have been various forms of CT. Advances in computer science and information and communication technology have increased the availability and accessibility of computerized CT. For example, virtual reality can provide intervention in a flexible and real world-like environment and promote visual spatial functions through learning and empathy results . Computer-based CT is more engaging and immersive than traditional cognitive training, complete with pictures, sounds, actions and feedback. The different forms of CT may also be responsible for the differences in results, but they were not further analyzed in this study. Previous studies have reported that interventions delivered using technology showed better results in improving cognitive function and mobility compared to traditional cognitive training, possibly related to the real-time feedback and motivational factors received from the training system . Acupressure + CT was one of this study’s most effective interventions to improve cognitive function. To our knowledge, this was the first network meta-analysis showing improved cognitive function after acupressure + CT. Further studies on acupressure + CT as adjunctive therapy for older adults with MCI are warranted because the mechanism of action behind it remains unknown.
The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions in improving the mental health of individuals has been widely recognized [19, 20, 63]. Recently, studies have found that mindfulness training can benefit cognitive function . The mechanism behind this may be related to enhanced immune regulation, changes in gene expression and activity, and reduced levels of inflammatory markers . Moreover, recent studies suggest that mindfulness training may play a role in improving cognitive function by modulating the intestinal microbiome . However, due to the limited number and sample of studies and their generally low quality, the results of cognitive improvement were inconclusive. In our network meta-analysis, the effects of MA were not satisfactory among all the interventions in this study, which was consistent with the results of other reviews. It was reported that there was no significant difference in the effect of mindfulness-based interventions on improving cognitive function compared to the active control group [66, 67]. Therefore, high-quality studies comparing mindfulness training with other interventions are still needed to determine the effectiveness and priority of mindfulness training.
Although the sample size for indirect comparisons was limited, consistency analysis showed that the results of direct and indirect comparisons were consistent, implying that the results of this study are plausible.
Despite the strengths of this network meta-analysis, there are also limitations. (1) Due to the limited number of studies, only 6 of the 18 nonpharmacological interventions were analyzed for direct comparison. (2) Only 15% of the studies had more than 100 participants per group, which may introduce bias. (3) The methodological quality of the included studies was overall low and characterized by a high risk of bias. (4) Although the SUCRA allows comparison of the effectiveness between interventions, it also has limitations, and results should be interpreted cautiously. SUCRA did not show whether the difference between interventions was clinically significant. (5) We grouped the interventions into 18 categories based on published studies. However, we did not further analyze the effectiveness of the different interventions in each category. For example, we categorized treatments with three or more simultaneous interventions as MI, but did not specifically analyze the differences and it is undeniable that heterogeneity exists between these interventions.
Implications for clinical practice
With regard to the treatment of mild cognitive impairment, the safety of nonpharmacological interventions contrasts with that of pharmacological treatments. Medications inevitably produce side effects that even counteract the therapeutic benefits they provide. Hence, healthcare workers, especially community caregivers, should be encouraged to apply promising nonpharmacological interventions to patients with MCI during usual care. In addition, family caregivers are expected to be essential intervention implementers because most nonpharmacological interventions are easy to learn and conduct. Future studies with larger sample sizes and multiple arms of nonpharmacological interventions are needed to determine the effectiveness of cognitive function in older adults with MCI.
We conducted a comprehensive analysis of the effectiveness of 18 different nonpharmacological interventions on cognitive function in adults aged over 60 years with MCI. The results of this network meta-analysis suggested that acupressure + CT was the optimal nonpharmacological intervention to improve cognitive function in older adults significantly. Therefore, healthcare workers should select appropriate interventions based on older adults’ preferences and cognitive levels to improve cognitive function and reduce caregivers' burden.
Salinas-Rodríguez A, Palazuelos-González R, Rivera-Almaraz A et al (2021) Longitudinal association of sarcopenia and mild cognitive impairment among older Mexican adults. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 12:1848–1859. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12787
Anderson ND (2019) State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr 24:78–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852918001347
Dunne RA, Aarsland D, O’Brien JT et al (2021) Mild cognitive impairment: the Manchester consensus. Age Ageing 50:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa228
McWhirter L, Ritchie C, Stone J et al (2020) Functional cognitive disorders: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry 7:191–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30405-5
Gómez-Ramírez J, Ávila-Villanueva M, Fernández-Blázquez M (2020) Selecting the most important self-assessed features for predicting conversion to mild cognitive impairment with random forest and permutation-based methods. Sci Rep 10:20630. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77296-4
Burks HB, des Bordes JKA, Chadha R et al (2021) Quality of life assessment in older adults with dementia: a systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 50:103–110. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515317
WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee (2019) Risk reduction of cognitive decline and dementia: WHO guidelines. World Health Organization, Geneva
Marotta N, Calafiore D, Curci C, et al (2022) Integrating virtual reality and exergaming in cognitive rehabilitation of patients with Parkinson disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. https://doi.org/10.23736/s1973-9087.22.07643-2
Gates NJ, Vernooij RW, Di Nisio M et al (2019) Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:Cd012279. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012279.pub2
Law CK, Lam FM, Chung RC et al (2020) Physical exercise attenuates cognitive decline and reduces behavioural problems in people with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic review. J Physiother 66:9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphys.2019.11.014
Biazus-Sehn LF, Schuch FB, Firth J et al (2020) Effects of physical exercise on cognitive function of older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 89:104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104048
da Costa BR, Juni P (2014) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls. Eur Heart J 35:3336–3345. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu424
Dias S, Caldwell DM (2019) Network meta-analysis explained. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 104:F8–F12. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018-315224
Gong LL, Tao FY (2021) The effect of biopsychosocial holistic care models on the cognitive function and quality of life of elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized trial. Ann Palliat Med 10:5600–5609. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-966
Lam LC, Chan WC, Leung T et al (2015) Would older adults with mild cognitive impairment adhere to and benefit from a structured lifestyle activity intervention to enhance cognition?: a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE 10:e0118173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118173
Lam LCW, Chau RCM, Wong BML et al (2012) A 1-year randomized controlled trial comparing mind body exercise (Tai Chi) with stretching and toning exercise on cognitive function in older chinese adults at risk of cognitive decline. J Am Med Directors Assoc 13:568.e15-568.e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2012.03.008
Li L, Liu M, Zeng H et al (2021) Multi-component exercise training improves the physical and cognitive function of the elderly with mild cognitive impairment: a six-month randomized controlled trial. Ann Palliat Med 10:8919–8929
Liu CL, Cheng FY, Wei MJ et al (2022) Effects of exergaming-based tai chi on cognitive function and dual-task gait performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized control trial. Front Aging Neurosci 14:761053. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.761053
Sun J, Zeng H, Pan L et al (2021) Acupressure and cognitive training can improve cognitive functions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Front Psychol 12:726083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.726083
Sun Y, Li Y, Wang J et al (2021) Effectiveness of smartphone-based mindfulness training on maternal perinatal depression: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 23:e23410. https://doi.org/10.2196/23410
Wang L, Wu B, Tao H et al (2020) Effects and mediating mechanisms of a structured limbs-exercise program on general cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 110:103706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103706
Xu Z, Sun W, Zhang D et al (2021) Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for depressive symptoms in mild cognitive impairment: systematic review with network meta-analysis. Aging Ment Health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1998356
Xue B, Xiao A, Luo X et al (2021) The effect of a game training intervention on cognitive functioning and depression symptoms in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 30:e1887. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1887
Yang QH, Lyu X, Lin QR et al (2022) Effects of a multicomponent intervention to slow mild cognitive impairment progression: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud 125:104110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104110
Young KW, Ng P, Kwok T et al (2017) The effects of holistic health group interventions on improving the cognitive ability of persons with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging 12:1543–1552. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.S142109
Yu L, Liu F, Nie P et al (2021) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of Baduanjin exercise on cognition and memory in patients with mild cognitive impairment. Clin Rehabil 35:492–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520969661
Bae S, Lee S, Lee S et al (2019) The effect of a multicomponent intervention to promote community activity on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med 42:164–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2018.11.011
Doi T, Verghese J, Makizako H et al (2017) Effects of cognitive leisure activity on cognition in mild cognitive impairment: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:686–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.013
Suzuki T, Shimada H, Makizako H et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial of multicomponent exercise in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. PLoS ONE 8:e61483. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061483
Suzuki T, Shimada H, Makizako H et al (2012) Effects of multicomponent exercise on cognitive function in older adults with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol 12:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-128
Choi W, Lee S (2019) Virtual Kayak paddling exercise improves postural balance, muscle performance, and cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. J Aging Phys Act. https://doi.org/10.1123/jap2018-0020
Hong SG, Kim JH, Jun TW (2018) Effects of 12-week resistance exercise on electroencephalogram patterns and cognitive function in the elderly with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Clin J Sport Med 28:500–508. https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0000000000000476
Park H, Park JH, Na HR et al (2019) Combined intervention of physical activity, aerobic exercise, and cognitive exercise intervention to prevent cognitive decline for patients with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Clin Med 8:940. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8070940
Carcelén-Fraile MDC, Llera-DelaTorre AM, Aibar-Almazán A et al (2022) Cognitive stimulation as alternative treatment to improve psychological disorders in patients with mild cognitive impairment. J Clin Med 11:3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11143947
Gómez-Soria I, Brandín-de la Cruz N, Cuenca Zaldívar JN et al (2022) Effectiveness of personalized cognitive stimulation in older adults with mild possible cognitive impairment: a 12-month follow-up cognitive stimulation in mild cognitive impairment. Clin Gerontol 45:878–890. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2021.1937764
de Oliveira Silva F, Ferreira JV, Plácido J et al (2019) Three months of multimodal training contributes to mobility and executive function in elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment, but not in those with Alzheimer’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Maturitas 126:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.04.217
Langoni CDS, Resende TL, Barcellos AB et al (2019) Effect of exercise on cognition, conditioning, muscle endurance, and balance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. J Geriatr Phys Ther 42:E15–E22. https://doi.org/10.1519/jpt.0000000000000191
Li F, Harmer P, Fitzgerald K et al (2022) A cognitively enhanced online Tai Ji Quan training intervention for community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a feasibility trial. BMC Geriatr 22:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02747-0
Masika GM, Yu DSF, Li PWC (2021) Can visual art therapy be implemented with illiterate older adults with mild cognitive impairment? A pilot mixed-method randomized controlled trial. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 34:76–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988720901789
Ghafoor U, Lee JH, Hong KS et al (2019) Effects of acupuncture therapy on MCI patients using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Front Aging Neurosci 11:237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00237
Bademli K, Lok N, Canbaz M et al (2019) Effects of Physical Activity Program on cognitive function and sleep quality in elderly with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Perspect Psychiatr Care 55:401–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12324
Xu Z, Zhang D, Lee ATC et al (2020) A pilot feasibility randomized controlled trial on combining mind-body physical exercise, cognitive training, and nurse-led risk factor modification to reduce cognitive decline among older adults with mild cognitive impairment in primary care. PeerJ 8:e9845. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9845
Doi T, Verghese J, Makizako H et al (2017) Effects of cognitive leisure activity on cognition in mild cognitive impairment: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Directors Assoc 18:686–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2017.02.013
Lam LC, Chau RC, Wong BM et al (2011) Interim follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing Chinese style mind body (Tai Chi) and stretching exercises on cognitive function in subjects at risk of progressive cognitive decline. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 26:733–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2602
Lam LC, Chau RC, Wong BM et al (2012) A 1-year randomized controlled trial comparing mind body exercise (Tai Chi) with stretching and toning exercise on cognitive function in older Chinese adults at risk of cognitive decline. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13:568.e515–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2012.03.008
Seitidis G, Nikolakopoulos S, Hennessy EA et al (2022) Network meta-analysis techniques for synthesizing prevention science evidence. Prev Sci 23:415–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01289-6
Zeng H, Liu M, Wang P et al (2016) The effects of acupressure training on sleep quality and cognitive function of older adults: a 1-year randomized controlled trial. Res Nurs Health 39:328–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21738
Chen IH, Yeh TP, Yeh YC et al (2019) Effects of acupressure on sleep quality and psychological distress in nursing home residents: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc 20:822–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2019.01.003
Tseng YT, Chen IH, Lee PH et al (2021) Effects of auricular acupressure on depression and anxiety in older adult residents of long-term care institutions: a randomized clinical trial. Geriatr Nurs 42:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.08.003
Zokaei N, MacKellar C, Čepukaitytė G et al (2017) Cognitive training in the elderly: bottlenecks and new avenues. J Cogn Neurosci 29:1473–1482. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01080
McFadden KL, Healy KM, Dettmann ML et al (2011) Acupressure as a non-pharmacological intervention for traumatic brain injury (TBI). J Neurotrauma 28:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1515
Deng X, Teng J, Nong X et al (2021) Characteristics of TCM constitution and related biomarkers for mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 17:1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.S290692
Smith CA, Collins CT, Levett KM et al (2020) Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:Cd009232. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009232.pub2
McEwen BS, Sapolsky RM (1995) Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol 5:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-x
Law R, Clow A (2020) Stress, the cortisol awakening response and cognitive function. Int Rev Neurobiol 150:187–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.irn.2020.01.001
Gates NJ, Rutjes AW, Di Nisio M et al (2020) Computerised cognitive training for 12 or more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:Cd012277. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub3
Bahar-Fuchs A, Martyr A, Goh AM et al (2019) Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:cd013069. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013069.pub2
Li BY, He NY, Qiao Y et al (2019) Computerized cognitive training for Chinese mild cognitive impairment patients: a neuropsychological and fMRI study. Neuroimage Clin 22:101691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101691
Loetscher T (2021) Cognitive training interventions for dementia and mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease—a cochrane review summary with commentary. NeuroRehabilitation 48:385–387. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-218001
Sala G, Gobet F (2019) Cognitive training does not enhance general cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 23:9–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.004
Kang JM, Kim N, Lee SY et al (2021) Effect of cognitive training in fully immersive virtual reality on visuospatial function and frontal-occipital functional connectivity in predementia: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 23:e24526. https://doi.org/10.2196/24526
Ge S, Zhu Z, Wu B et al (2018) Technology-based cognitive training and rehabilitation interventions for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr 18:213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0893-1
Xia R, Wan M, Lin H et al (2022) Effects of mind-body exercise Baduanjin on cognition in community-dwelling older people with mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2022.2099909
Hölzel BK, Lazar SW, Gard T et al (2011) how does mindfulness meditation work? Proposing mechanisms of action from a conceptual and neural perspective. Perspect Psychol Sci 6:537–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611419671
Khine WWT, Voong ML, Ng TKS et al (2020) Mental awareness improved mild cognitive impairment and modulated gut microbiome. Aging (Albany NY) 12:24371–24393. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.202277
Berk L, van Boxtel M, van Os J (2017) Can mindfulness-based interventions influence cognitive functioning in older adults? A review and considerations for future research. Aging Ment Health 21:1113–1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1247423
Whitfield T, Barnhofer T, Acabchuk R et al (2022) The effect of mindfulness-based programs on cognitive function in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rev 32:677–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09519-y
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest to declare.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., Wang, G. & Cao, Y. Association of nonpharmacological interventions for cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 35, 463–478 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-022-02333-3
- Mild cognitive impairment
- Nonpharmacological interventions
- Systematic review
- Network meta-analysis