Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Urologists may hesitate to offer transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) because of increased morbidity in elderly patients.

Aims

We aimed to compare data on postoperative outcomes of elderly men undergoing bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) as compared to thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP).

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for different patients characteristics.

Results

Between 2017 and 2020, 275 men were included in the analysis. Propensity score retrieved 65 patients in each group. Median age was 78 (4) years in B-TURP group and 78 (6) in ThuVEP group. Median prostate volume was 63 (35) ml and 54 (24) ml in B-TURP group and ThuVEP group, respectively. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in ThuVEP group (p = 0.006). Median operation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay were similar in both groups (55 min, 2 and 3 days). Overall, 84.6% of men had no complications, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.234). Only one patient in B-TURP group experienced a Clavien grade IIIb complication. By 1 year, there were a statistically significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score (p = 0.000) in favor of B-TURP group and in maximal urine flow rate (p = 0.000) in favor of ThuVEP group.

Discussion and conclusions

Both procedures showed excellent functional improvements one year after surgery with a low rate of major complications in men aged ≥ 75 years with small-to-medium sized prostates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the Mendeley Data repository (persistent web link to datasets: Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/6hhb9768j3.1. http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/6hhb9768j3.1).

References

  1. Bushman W (2009) Etiology, epidemiology, and natural history. Urol Clin North Am 36:403–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2009.07.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Girman CJ, Jacobsen SJ, Guess HA et al (1995) Natural history of prostatism: relationship among symptoms, prostate volume and peak urinary flow rate. J Urol 153:1510–1515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Egan KB (2016) The epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence and incident rates. Urol Clin North Am 43:289–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2016.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Platz EA, Smit E, Curhan GC et al (2002) Prevalence of and racial/ethnic variation in lower urinary tract symptoms and non-cancer prostate surgery in U.S. men. Urology 59:877–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01673-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobsen SJ, Guess HA, Panser L et al (1993) A population-based study of health care-seeking behavior for treatment of urinary symptoms. The Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men. Arch Fam Med 2:729–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett ATK et al (1989) Transurethral prostatectomy: Immediate and postoperative complications. Cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 141:243–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alexander CE, Scullion MMF, Omar MI et al (2020) Reprint—bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: a cochrane review. Can Urol Assoc J 14:423–430. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.6464

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Castellani D, Pirola GM, Pacchetti A et al (2020) State of the art of thulium laser enucleation and vapoenucleation of the prostate: a systematic review. Urology 136:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oelke M, Bachmann A, Descazeaud A et al (2013) EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol 64:118–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Culkin DJ, Exaire EJ, Green D et al (2014) Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in urological practice: ICUD/AUA review paper. J Urol 192:1026–1034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dellabella M, Castellani D (2018) Anatomical control of adenoma technique: an accurate surgical approach to thulium laser enucleation of the prostate. Urology 113:252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.11.037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nesbit RM (1951) Transurethral prostatic resection: a discussion of some principles and problems. J Urol 66:362–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)74350-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bach T, Wölbling F, Gross AJ et al (2017) Prospective assessment of perioperative course in 2648 patients after surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol 35:285–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1866-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang Z, Liu T, Wang X (2016) Comparison of thulium laser enucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in a randomized prospective trial with 5-year follow-up. Lasers Med Sci 31:1797–1802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-016-2052-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bozzini G, Seveso M, Melegari S et al (2017) Thulium laser enucleation (ThuLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate in saline (TURis): a randomized prospective trial to compare intra and early postoperative outcomes. Actas Urol Esp 41:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2016.06.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Z, Wang X, Liu T (2013) Thulium laser enucleation versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial with 18-month follow-up. Urology 81:396–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nordling J (2002) The aging bladder-a significant but underestimated role in the development of lower urinary tract symptoms. Exp Gerontol 37:991–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott MC, Winters ME (2015) Congestive heart failure. Emerg Med Clin North Am 33:553–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emc.2015.04.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Castellani D, Di Rosa M, Gasparri L et al (2020) Thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) in men at high cardiovascular risk and on antithrombotic therapy: a single-center experience. J Clin Med 9:917. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9040917

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Castellani D, Pirola GM, Gasparri L et al (2019) Are outcomes of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate different in men aged 75 and over? A propensity score analysis. Urology 132:170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.06.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Orimo H, Ito H, Suzuki T et al (2006) Reviewing the definition of “elderly.” Geriatr Gerontol Int 6:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2006.00341.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization (2015) Significant loss of functional ability, and care dependence. In: World Rep. Aging Heal. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186463/9789240694811_eng.pdf;jsessionid=2342855AC115632C5C15C1B21BAC57F9?sequence=1. Accessed 8 Feb 2021

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by GP, ER, MG, GMP, and LG. MDR performed statistical analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by DC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. AA and MD supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Castellani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Human/animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Ethical approval

The study has been approved by a IRCCS INRCA Ethical Board (DGEN 421/2017).

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castellani, D., Di Rosa, M., Pace, G. et al. Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 1757–1763 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01868-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-021-01868-1

Keywords

Navigation