Abstract
Background
Many older community-dwelling subjects may be frail and/or disoriented, putting them at risk of adverse outcomes. We investigated the prevalence of frailty and spatiotemporal disorientation among patients aged > 65 years collecting regular medication at a community pharmacy.
Methods
Prospective, cross-sectional study of geriatric evaluation in 218 community pharmacies in France. Regular customers aged > 65 years attending the pharmacy to receive ≥ 1 prescription drug were eligible. Spatio-temporal disorientation was assessed using a 4-item screening test; subjects were considered disoriented if they had ≥ 1 incorrect answers. Frailty was evaluated using the Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGA) grid. Subjects were considered as not frail (score < 8), or frail/very frail (score of 8 or more).
Results
4090 subjects were included, average age 77.5 ± 7.6 years, 60.1% females. Overall, 1025 (25%) were frail/very frail, and 384 (9.4%) were disoriented in space or time. On average, subjects were taking 5.4 ± 3.5 medications per day. Among non-frail patients, 116/3065 (3.8%) were disoriented, of whom 87 (87/116, 75%) managed their medication alone. Among frail/very frail patients, 268/1025 (26.1%) were disoriented, of whom 46 (46/268, 16.8%) managed their medication alone. The majority of patients (77.9%) collected their medication alone at the pharmacy, but significantly fewer frail patients came to collect their drugs alone (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
It is feasible for community pharmacists to detect disorientation and frailty among older patients. A quarter of subjects were frail/very frail, and 3.2% were disoriented yet managing their drugs alone. Additional social support should be envisaged for these subjects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al (2013) Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 381:752–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9
Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J et al (2004) Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:255–263. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.3.m255
Fairhall N, Langron C, Sherrington C et al (2011) Treating frailty—a practical guide. BMC Med 9:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-83
Ng TP, Feng L, Nyunt MS et al (2015) Nutritional, physical, cognitive, and combination interventions and frailty reversal among older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 128:e1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.017
Puts MTE, Toubasi S, Andrew MK et al (2017) Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies. Age Ageing 46:383–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afw247
Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA et al (2012) Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:1487–1492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x
O’Keeffe E, Mukhtar O, O’Keeffe ST (2011) Orientation to time as a guide to the presence and severity of cognitive impairment in older hospital patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 82:500–504. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2010.214817
Ferrario E, Seccia L, Massaia M et al (1998) Mini-mental state examination and wechsler memory scale subtest of logical memory: correlation in an over 70-year-old population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 26:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4943(98)80025-3
Sweet JJ, Suchy Y, Leahy B et al (1999) Normative clinical relationships between orientation and memory: age as an important moderator variable. Clin Neuropsychol 13:495–508. https://doi.org/10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT495
Castelino RL, Hilmer SN, Bajorek BV et al (2010) Drug Burden Index and potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older people: the impact of Home Medicines Review. Drugs Aging 27:135–148. https://doi.org/10.2165/11531560-000000000-00000
Rhalimi M, Rauss A, Housieaux E (2018) Drug-related problems identified during geriatric medication review in the community pharmacy. Int J Clin Pharm 40:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-017-0571-y
Oubaya N, Drame M, Novella JL et al (2017) Screening for frailty in community-dwelling elderly subjects: predictive validity of the modified SEGA instrument. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 73:177–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2017.07.026
Oubaya N, Mahmoudi R, Jolly D et al (2014) Screening for frailty in elderly subjects living at home: validation of the Modified Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGAm) instrument. J Nutr Health Aging 18:757–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-014-0541-1
Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H et al (2008) The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical practice. J Nutr Health Aging 12:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02982161
Aguayo GA, Donneau AF, Vaillant MT et al (2017) Agreement between 35 published frailty scores in the general population. Am J Epidemiol 186:420–434. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwx061
Buckinx F, Reginster JY, Gillain S et al (2017) Prevalence of frailty in nursing home residents according to various diagnostic tools. J Frailty Aging 6:122–128. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.20
Avila-Funes JA, Amieva H, Barberger-Gateau P et al (2009) Cognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of the phenotype of frailty for adverse health outcomes: the three-city study. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:453–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02136.x
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the participants, investigators, students, and internship supervisors from the six French regions involved in this study, as well as the members of the Scientific Committee. The authors also thank the funding organizations and their representatives (CARSAT Hauts-de-France, Agence National d’Appui à la Performance, Centre Hospitalier Bertinot Juel–Chaumont-en-Vexin) and Mr Joseph Debray for his constant support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Statement of human rights, ethics approval
Authorization was obtained from the Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest II) on January 13, 2017 (N° ID-RCB 2016-A017751-46, Ref. CPP 2016/107).
Informed consent
In accordance with the recommendations of the Ethics Committee, an information leaflet was given to each patient.
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed are those of the authors. The funders had no role in the design, methods, data collection, analysis, or preparation of this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rhalimi, M., Housieaux, E., Mary, A. et al. Role of the community pharmacist in detecting frailty and spatio-temporal disorientation among community-dwelling older people in France. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 1645–1650 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01673-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01673-2