Skip to main content
Log in

Predicting care intensity in geriatric home care patients: a comparison of different measures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Dependency in older ages is increasing. Many older persons receive care while living in the community. We aimed to identify the predictive value of four clinical measurements to predict home care intensity in older patients following discharge from hospital to home care over 90 days.

Methods

We included 425 inpatients from the “Frailty Department–Local Palliative Care Network” of the local social health authority (ASST) Lecco, Italy (mean age 75.4 years, SD 14.5; female 75.5%). Changes in Health, End-stage disease, and Signs and Symptoms, light version (CHESS-Lite), activities of daily living (ADL), frailty, and the Service Urgency Algorithm. Receiver operative curves were used to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) for predicting Home Care Intensity coefficient (ratio of the number of days when any home care was provided 90 days post-discharge). The interRAI Contact Assessment Instrument was used to calculate these measures.

Results

Analysis was stratified using six different home care intensity score cut-offs. CHESS-Lite had a higher AUC for predicting home care intensity at all cut-off levels but was best for predicting the highest level of home care intensity (≥ 0.8) where the AUC was 0.71 (0.64–0.79). The frailty index also had an acceptable AUC. ADL had the lowest AUC.

Conclusions

Health instability measured with CHESS-Lite has a high predictive value for identifying home care intensity in geriatric patients after discharge from hospital to home, especially in persons with higher home care intensity scores. Geriatric patients with high health instability should be focused on at discharge to prioritize assessment and initiate timely services for home care support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kingston A, Wohland P, Wittenberg R et al (2017) Is late-life dependency increasing or not? A comparison of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS). Lancet 390:1676–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Genet N, Boerma WG, Kringos DS et al (2011) Home care in Europe: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res 11:207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Onder G, Palmer K, Navickas R et al (2015) Time to face the challenge of multimorbidity. A European perspective from the joint action on chronic diseases and promoting healthy ageing across the life cycle (JA-CHRODIS). Eur J Intern Med 26:157–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Palmer K, Marengoni A, Forjaz MJ et al (2018) Multimorbidity care model: recommendations from the consensus meeting of the joint action on chronic diseases and promoting healthy ageing across the life cycle (JA-CHRODIS). Health Policy 122:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. http://www.Interrai.Org/contact-assessment.Html

  6. Searle SD, Mitnitski A, Gahbauer EA et al (2008) A standard procedure for creating a frailty index. BMC Geriatr 8:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hirdes JPC-TN, Poss JW, Gray L et al (2010) InterRAI Contact Assessment (CA) form and user’s manual: a screening level assessment for emergency de-partment and intake from community/hospital. Version 9.2., Inter-RAI, Washington, DC

  8. Lee JS, Chau PP, Hui E et al (2009) Survival prediction in nursing home residents using the minimum data set subscales: adl self-performance hierarchy, cognitive performance and the changes in health, end-stage disease and symptoms and signs scales. Eur J Pub Health 19:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Onder G, Carpenter I, Finne-Soveri H et al (2012) Assessment of nursing home residents in Europe: the Services and Health for Elderly in Long TERm care (SHELTER) study. BMC Health Serv Res 12:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scaccabarozzi G, Lovaglio PG, Limonta F et al (2019) Monitoring the Italian home palliative care services. Healthcare (Basel). 7:4. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7010004

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Scaccabarozzi G, Lovaglio PG, Limonta F et al (2017) Quality assessment of palliative home care in Italy. J Eval Clin Pract 23:725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopman-Rock M, van Hirtum H, de Vreede P et al (2019) Activities of daily living in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments. Aging Clin Exp Res 31:917–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to Dr. Paolo Pizzol for his assistance in processing data from the interRAI and Massimo Re for his assistance in processing data from the management data of the Frailty Department. The authors are also extremely grateful to medical, nursing, and management staff of hospital units and Frailty Department thanks to which it was possible to carry out the project.

Funding

There is no funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Palmer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Informed consent

This study is based on administrative anonymized data and informed consent is not required according to Italian law.

Ethical approval

This study is based on administrative anonymized data and ethical approval is not required according to Italian law.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scaccabarozzi, G., Palmer, K., Onder, G. et al. Predicting care intensity in geriatric home care patients: a comparison of different measures. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 281–287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01427-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01427-9

Keywords

Navigation