Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comorbidity and low use of new antiplatelets in acute coronary syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the use of the new generation P2Y12 inhibitors (Ticagrelor and Prasugrel) with aspirin is the recommended therapy in acute NSTE-ACS patients, their current use in clinical practice remains quite low and might be related, among several variables, with increased comorbidity burden. We aimed to assess the prevalence of these treatments and whether their use could be associated with comorbidity.

Method

A multicentric prospective registry was conducted at 8 Cardiac Intensive Care Units (October 2017–April 2018) in patients admitted with non ST elevation myocardial infarction. Antithrombotic treatment was recorded and the comorbidity risk was assessed using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. We created a multivariate model to identify the independent predictors of the use of new inhibitors of P2Y12.

Results

A total of 629 patients were included, median age 67 years, 23.2% women, 359 patients (57.1%) treated with clopidogrel and 40.6% with new P2Y12 inhibitors: ticagrelor (228 patients, 36.2%) and prasugrel (30 patients, 4.8%). Among the patients with very high comorbidity (Charlson Score > 6) clopidogrel was the drug of choice (82.6%), meanwhile in patients with low comorbility (Charlson Score 0–1) was the ticagrelor or prasugrel (63.6%). Independent predictors of the use of ticagrelor or prasugrel were a low Charlson Comorbidity Index, a low CRUSADE score and the absence of prior bleeding.

Conclusion

Antiplatelet treatment with Ticagrelor or Pasugrel was low in patients admitted with NSTE-ACS. Comorbidity calculated with Charlson Comorbidity Index was a powerful predictor of the use of new generation P2Y12 inhibitors in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

NSTE-ACS:

Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

NAAs:

P2Y12-inhibitor antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor and prasugrel)

CICUs:

Cardiac intensive care units

References

  1. Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR et al (2001) Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 345:494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Steinhubl SR, Berger PB, Mann JT et al (2002) Early and sustained dual oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:2411–2420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matetzky S, Shenkman B, Guetta V et al (2004) Clopidogrel resistance is associated with increased risk of recurrent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 109:3171–3175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH et al (2007) Prasugrel versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wallentin L, Becker RC, Budaj A et al (2009) Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. N Engl J Med 361:1045–1057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann F-J, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A et al (2018) ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention 14:1435–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferlini M, Musumeci G, Grieco N et al (2018) The paradox of clopidogrel use in patients with acute coronary syndromes and diabetes insight from the diabetes: and acute coronary syndrome registry. Coron Artery Dis 29:309–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Almendro-Delia M, García-Alcántara Á, de la Torre-Prados MV et al (2017) Safety and efficacy of prasugrel and ticagrelor in acute coronary syndrome. Results of a « real world » multicenter registry. Rev Espanola Cardiol Engl Ed 70:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sachdev M, Sun JL, Tsiatis AA et al (2004) The prognostic importance of comorbidity for mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:576–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chirinos JA, Veerani A, Zambrano JP et al (2007) Evaluation of comorbidity scores to predict all-cause mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 117:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fassa A-A, Urban P, Radovanovic D et al (2010) Impact of comorbidities on clinical presentation, management and outcome of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovasc Med 13:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  12. Radovanovic D, Seifert B, Urban P et al (2014) Validity of charlson comorbidity index in patients hospitalised with acute coronary syndrome. Insights from the nationwide amis plus registry 2002–2012. Heart Br Card Soc. 100:288–294

    Google Scholar 

  13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL et al (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 40:373–383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA et al (2018) 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTSThe Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J 39:213–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blin P, Dureau-Pournin C, Benichou J et al (2018) Secondary prevention of acute coronary events with antiplatelet agents (SPACE-AA): one-year real-world effectiveness and safety cohort study in the French nationwide claims database. Atherosclerosis 281:98–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Alexopoulos D, Xanthopoulou I, Deftereos S et al (2016) Contemporary antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: 1-year outcomes from the GReek AntiPlatElet (GRAPE) Registry. J Thromb Haemost JTH 14:1146–1154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Beigel R, Iakobishvili Z, Shlomo N et al (2017) Real-World Use of Novel P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: a Treatment Paradox. Cardiology 136:21–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ariza-Solé A, Sánchez-Salado JC, Lorente V et al (2014) Is it possible to separate ischemic and bleeding risk in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes? Int J Cardiol 171:448–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lorente V, Ariza-Solé A, Jacob J et al (2019) Criteria for admitting elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome to critical care units from Spanish hospital emergency departments: a LONGEVO-SCA cohort study. Emerg Rev Soc Espanola Med Emerg 31:154–160

    Google Scholar 

  20. Subherwal S, Bach RG, Chen AY et al (2009) Baseline risk of major bleeding in non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: the CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA Guidelines) Bleeding Score. Circulation 119:1873–1882

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S et al (2017) Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual-patient datasets from clinical trials. Lancet 389:1025–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Baber U, Mehran R, Giustino G et al (2016) Coronary Thrombosis and Major Bleeding After PCI With Drug-Eluting Stents: risk Scores From PARIS. J Am Coll Cardiol 67:2224–2234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, Lorente V et al (2014) Efficacy of bleeding risk scores in elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes. Rev Espanola Cardiol Engl Ed 67:463–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alonso Salinas GL, Sanmartín Fernández M et al (2016) Frailty predicts major bleeding within 30 days in elderly patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Int J Cardiol 222:590–593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spencer FA, Moscucci M, Granger CB et al (2007) Does comorbidity account for the excess mortality in patients with major bleeding in acute myocardial infarction? Circulation 116:2793–2801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Montalescot G, Bolognese L, Dudek D et al (2013) Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 369:999–1010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ariza-Solé A, Formiga F, Bardají A et al (2018) Clinical characteristics and prognosis of very elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor: insights from the LONGEVO-SCA Registry. Rev Espanola Cardiol Engl Ed. 72:263–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raposeiras-Roubín S, Faxén J, Íñiguez-Romo A et al (2018) Development and external validation of a post-discharge bleeding risk score in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the BleeMACS score. Int J Cardiol 254:10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sim DS, Jeong MH, Kim HS et al (2018) Utility of GRACE and ACUITY-HORIZONS risk scores to guide dual antiplatelet therapy in Korean patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing drug-eluting stenting. J Cardiol 72:411–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaime Aboal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

Authors declare all the procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed consent

Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aboal, J., Llaó, I., García García, C. et al. Comorbidity and low use of new antiplatelets in acute coronary syndrome. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 1525–1531 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01348-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01348-7

Keywords

Navigation