Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of aging on spatial hearing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Aging has several effects on auditory processing with the most important effect known as speech perception impairment in noise.

Aims

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of aging on spatial hearing using quick speech in noise (QSIN) and binaural masking level difference (BMLD) tests and speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) questionnaire.

Methods

The study was carried out on 34 elderly people, aged 60–75 years, with normal peripheral hearing and 34 young participants, aged 18–25 years. Using SSQ questionnaire and QSIN and BMLD tests, the spatial auditory processing ability was compared between the two groups.

Results

Comparison of mean scores using independent t test showed that there was a significant difference in the mean scores of QSIN, BMLD tests and SSQ questionnaire between the two groups (p < 0.001). Sex was not found to have any effect on the results (p > 0.05).

Discussion

Structural and neurochemical changes that occur in different parts of the central nervous system by aging affect various aspects of spatial auditory processing, such as localization, the precedence effect, and speech perception in noise.

Conclusions

Lower scores of older adults with normal hearing in SSQ questionnaire and behavioral tests, compared with younger participants, may be considered as their weak performance in spatial auditory processing. The results of the present study reconfirm the effects of aging on spatial auditory processing, such as localization and speech perception in noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Musiek FE, Chermak GD (2007) Handbook of (Central) auditory processing disorder. Plural Publishing, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yalçinkaya F, Keith R (2008) Understanding auditory processing disorders. Turk J Pediatr 50:34–45

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bear M, Connors B, Paradiso MA (2007) Neuroscience: exploring the brain, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Konig R, Heil P, Budinger E et al (2005) The auditory cortex: a synthesis of human and animal research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pickles J (2008) An introduction to the physiology of hearing, 3rd edn. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scott S (2005) Auditory processing speech, space and auditory objects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15:197–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. King A, Schnupp J (2007) The auditory cortex. Curr Biol 17:236–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Peelle J, Johnsrude I, Davis M (2010) Hierarchical processing for speech in human auditory cortex and beyond. Front Hum Neurosci 4:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  9. Langers D, Backes W, Dijk P (2007) Representation of lateralization and tonotopy in primary versus secondary human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 34:264–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi JE, Moon IJ, Kim EY et al (2017) Sound localization and speech perception in noise of pediatric cochlear implant recipients: bimodal fitting versus bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear 38:426–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lotfi Y, Moosavi A, Abdollahi FZ et al (2016) Effects of an auditory lateralization raining in children suspected to central auditory processing disorder. J Audiol Otol 20:102–108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Reeder RM, Cadieux J, Firszt JB (2015) Quantification of speech in noise and sound localisation abilities in children with unilateral hearing loss and comparison to normal hearing peers. Audiol Neurotol 20:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Palomaki KJ, Tiitinen H, Makinen V et al (2005) Spatial processing in human auditory cortex: the effects of 3D, ITD, and ILD stimulation techniques. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 24:364–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Yper LN, Vermeire K, De Vel EF et al (2015) Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study. Clin Neurophysiol 126:772–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Allen K, Carlile S, Alais D (2008) Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1562–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Arbogast TL, Mason CR, Kidd G Jr (2005) The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 117:2169–2180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cameron S, Dillon H (2007) Development of the listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S). Ear Hear 28:196–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cameron S, Glyde H, Dillon H (2011) Listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LiSN-S): normative and retest reliability data for adolescents and adults up to 60 years of age. J Am Acad Audiol 22:697–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tyler RS, Perreau AE, Ji H (2009) Validation of the spatial hearing questionnaire. Ear Hear 30:466–474

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Galvin KL, Noble W (2013) Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers. Cochlear Implants Int 14:135–141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Delphi M, Lotfi Y, Moossavi A et al (2017) Reliability of interaural time difference-based localization training in elderly individuals with speech-in-noise perception disorder. Iran J Med Sci 42:437–442

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Noble W, Gatehouse S (2006) Effects of bilateral versus unilateral hearing aid fittings on abilities measured by the Speech, Spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol 45:172–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lovett RE, Kitterick PT, Huang S et al (2012) The developmental trajectory of spatial listening skills in normal-hearing children. J Speech Lang Hearing Res 55:865–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song PL, Li HJ, Wang NY (2011) Benefits of spatial hearing to speech recognition in young people with normal hearing. Chin Med J (Engl) 124:4269–4274

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson S, Kraus N (2010) Objective neural indices of speech-in-noise perception. Trends Amplif 14:73–83

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pichora Fuller MK, Levitt H (2012) Speech comprehension training and auditory and cognitive processing in older adults. Am J Audiol 21:351–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T et al (2012) Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci 32(41):14156–14164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin JS, Jerger JF (2005) Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev 42:25–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Besser J, Festen JM, Goverts ST et al (2015) Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies. Ear Hear 36:24–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Noble W, Tyler RS, Dunn CC et al (2009) Younger- and older-age adults with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants: speech and spatial hearing self-ratings and performance. Otol Neurotol Off Publ Am Otol Soc Am Neurotol Soc Eur Acad Otol Neurotol 30:921–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Katz J, Chasin M, English K et al (2015) Handbook of clinical audiology. Wolters Kluwer Health, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Creavin ST, Wisniewski S, Noel-Storr AH et al (2016) Mini-mental state examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 13:CD011145

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lotfi Y, Nazeri AR, Asgari A et al (2016) Iranian version of speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale: a psychometric study. Acta Med Iran 54:756–764

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shayanmehr S, Tahaei AA, Fatahi J et al (2015) Development, validity and reliability of persian quick speech in noise test with steady noise. Auditory Vestib Res 24:234–244

    Google Scholar 

  36. Heidari A, Moossavi A, Yadegari F et al (2018) Effects of age on speech-in-noise identification: subjective ratings of hearing difficulties and encoding of fundamental frequency in older adults. J Audiol Otol 22:134–139

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK (2010) Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Int J Audiol 49:733–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Clarke Cox L, McCoy SL, Tun A et al (2008) Monotic auditory processing disorder tests in the older adult population. J Am Acad Audiol 19:293–308

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Duncan KR, Aarts NL (2006) A comparison of the HINT and Quick SIN tests. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol 30(2):86–94

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grose JH, Poth EA, Peters RW (1994) Masking level differences for tones and speech in elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms. J Speech Hear Res 37:422–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Atcherson SR, Nagaraj NK, Kennett SE et al (2015) Overview of central auditory processing deficits in older adults. Semin Hear 36:150–161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Abel SM, Giguere C, Consoli A et al (2000) The effect of aging on horizontal plane sound localization. J Acoust Soc Am 108:743–752

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Anderson S, Parbery-Clark A, White-Schwoch T et al (2012) Aging affects neural precision of speech encoding. J Neurosci 32:14156–14164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Kubo T, Sakashita T, Kusuki M et al (1998) Sound lateralization and speech discrimination in patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Oto Laryngol Suppl 538:63–69

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Gallun FJ, Diedesch AC, Kampel SD et al (2013) Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment. Fron Neurosci 7:25–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to appreciate Yas Elderly Care Center and Health Home of Tehran Municipality, and all other participants of the current study for their cooperation.

Funding

The study was supported by Grant no. 97-02-32-38674 from Tehran University of Medical Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ghassem Mohammadkhani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article is based on a PhD dissertation by Majid Ashrafi. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, coded as IR TUMS FNM REC 1397 025.

Informed consent

All patients were informed about the nature of the study and a written informed consent was obtained.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adel Ghahraman, M., Ashrafi, M., Mohammadkhani, G. et al. Effects of aging on spatial hearing. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 733–739 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01233-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01233-3

Keywords

Navigation