Advertisement

The association between hand grip strength and rehabilitation outcome in post-acute hip fractured patients

  • Avital HershkovitzEmail author
  • Beloosesky Yichayaou
  • Ayelet Ronen
  • Gal Maydan
  • Natalia Kornyukov
  • Arie Burstin
  • Shai Brill
Original Article
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Various factors have been shown to affect the rehabilitation outcome of hip fractured patients. Considering the decrease in muscle mass with aging and its impact on mobility, we hypothesized that a relationship exists between hand grip strength and rehabilitation outcome.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 373 post-hip fracture patients, admitted for rehabilitation. Muscle strength was measured by hand grip dynamometer. Main outcome measures: functional independence measure motor functional independence measure, motor functional independence measure effectiveness and length of stay). A favorable functional gain was defined as a motor Functional Independence Measure effectiveness score > 0.5. The Spearman correlation assessed the associations between hand grip strength and outcome measures. A multiple linear regression model tested whether hand grip strength was an independent predictor of discharge motor Functional Independence Measure scores and length of stay

Results

Significant correlations were found between hand grip strength and functional outcomes. A significant independent association was found between hand grip strength and discharge motor Functional Independence Measure score after adjustment for confounding demographic and clinical variables. High hand grip strength on admission was significantly associated with a greater chance of achieving a favorable functional gain (OR 1.064, 95% CI, 1.01–1.13; p = 0.032). Hand grip strength was not found to be associated with length of stay.

Conclusion

Hand grip strength is independently associated with rehabilitation outcome in post-acute frail hip fractured patients. Initial screening for hand grip strength on admission may help identify patients who require an intensive resistance exercise program.

Keywords

Hand grip strength Rehabilitation outcomes Older people Frail Hip fracture 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Mrs. Phyllis Curchack Kornspan for her editorial services.

Author contributions

AH initiated the study, helped write the manuscript, was involved in data collection, and review of the literature. CA was involved with data collection and review of the literature. SB assisted in editing the manuscript and review of the literature. RN helped write the manuscript, review of the literature and was involved in data collection.

Compliance with ethical standard

Conflict of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest. This work was not supported by any funding sources.

Statement of human and animal rights

This study was approved by the hospital’s Institutional Review Board (human and animals rights) #0198-18-RMC.

Informed consent

For this type of retrospective study informed consent is not necessary.

References

  1. 1.
    Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R et al (2008) Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury 39:1157–1163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness: Clinical Guideline 124 - Hip Fracture. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg124/resources/hip-fracture-management-35109449902789). Accessed 11 Jul 2017
  3. 3.
    Zuckerman JD (1996) Hip fracture. N Engl J Med 6:1519–1525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beloosesky Y, Weiss A, Manasian M et al (2010) Handgrip strength of the elderly after hip fracture repair correlates with functional outcome. Disabil Rehabil 32:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, De Toma E et al (2014) Handgrip strength but not appendicular lean mass is an independent predictor of functional outcome in hip-fracture women: a short-term prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95:1719–1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Monaco M, Castiglioni C, De Toma E et al (2015) Handgrip strength is an independent predictor of functional outcome in hip-fracture women: a prospective study with 6-month follow-up. Medicine 94:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Visser M, Harris TB, Fox KM et al (2000) Change in muscle mass and muscle strength after a hip fracture: relationship to mobility recovery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M434–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savino E, Martini E, Lauretani F et al (2013) Handgrip strength predicts persistent walking recovery after hip fracture surgery. Am J Med 126:1068–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sherrington C, Lord SR (2005) Reliability of simple portable tests of physical performance in older people after hip fracture. Clin Rehabil 19:496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bohannon RW (2001) Dynamometer measurements of hand-grip strength predict multiple outcomes. Percept Mot Skills 93:323–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bohannon RW (2008) Hand-grip dynamometry predicts future outcomes in aging adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 31:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Hao Q et al (2019) Sarcopenia and hospital-related outcomes in the old people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 31:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS et al (1987) A uniform national data system for medical rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer MJ (ed) Rehabilitation outcomes: analysis and measurement. Brookes Publishing Company, Buffalo, NY, pp 137–147Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHuge PR (1975) “Mini-Mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rolland Y, Pillard F, Lauwers-Cances V et al (2004) Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture and cognitive impairment. Disabil Rehabil 26:425–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heruti RJ, Lusky A, Barell V et al (1999) Cognitive status at admission: does it affect the rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients with hip fracture? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:432–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koh GC, Chen CH, Petrella R et al (2013) Rehabilitation impact indices and their independent predictors: a systematic review. BMJ Open 3:e003483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beaupre LA, Binder EF, Cameron ID et al (2013) Maximising functional recovery following hip fracture in frail seniors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 27:771–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mukka S, Knutsson B, Krupic F et al (2017) The influence of cognitive status on outcome and walking ability after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a prospective cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27:653–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McGilton KS, Chu CH, Naglie G et al (2016) Factors influencing outcomes of older adults after undergoing rehabilitation for hip fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 64:1601–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Foley D et al (1999) Midlife hand grip strength as a predictor of old age disability. JAMA 281:558–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cooper R, Kuh D, Hardy R et al (2010) Objectively measured physical capability levels and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c4467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walrand S, Guillet C, Salles J et al (2011) Physiopathological mechanism of sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med 27:365–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nilwik R, Snijders T, Leenders M et al (2013) The decline in skeletal muscle mass with aging is mainly attributed to a reduction in type II muscle fiber size. Exp Gerontol 48:492–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Degens H (2007) Age-related skeletal muscle dysfunction: causes and mechanisms. Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 7:246–252Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB et al (2006) The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:1059–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M et al (2009) Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr 90:1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Visser M, Goodpaster BH, Kritchevsky SB et al (2005) Muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle fat infiltration as predictors of incident mobility limitations in well-functioning older persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 60:324–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tosato M, Marzetti E, Cesari M et al (2017) Measurement of muscle mass in sarcopenia: from imaging to biochemical markers. Aging Clin Exp Res 29:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen L, Nelson DR, Zhao Y et al (2013) Relationship between muscle mass and muscle strength, and the impact of comorbidities: a population-based, cross-sectional study of older adults in the United States. BMC Geriatr 13:74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hayashida I, Tanimoto Y, Takahashi Y et al (2014) Correlation between muscle strength and muscle mass, and their association with walking speed, in community-dwelling elderly Japanese individuals. PLoS One 9:e111810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim KE, Jang SN, Lim S (2012) Relationship between muscle mass and physical performance: is it the same in older adults with weak muscle strength? Age Ageing 41:799–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Woods JL, Iuliano-Burns S, King SJ et al (2011) Poor physical function in elderly women in low-level aged care is related to muscle strength rather than to measures of sarcopenia. Clin Interv Aging 6:67–76Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Beaudart C, Locquet M, Reginster JY et al (2018) Quality of life in sarcopenia measured with the SarQoL®: impact of the use of different diagnosis definitions. Aging Clin Exp Res 30:307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Host HH, Sinacore DR, Bohnert KL et al (2007) Training-induced strength and functional adaptations after hip fracture. Phys Ther 87:292–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sylliaas H, Brovold T, Wyller TB et al (2012) Prolonged strength training in older patients after hip fracture: a randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 41:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee SY, Yoon BH, Beom J et al (2017) Effect of lower-limb progressive resistance exercise after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Am Med Dir Assoc 18:1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fiatarone Singh MA (2014) Exercise, nutrition and managing hip fracture in older persons. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 17:12–24Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    American College of Sports Medicine (2009) Position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 41:687–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avital Hershkovitz
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Beloosesky Yichayaou
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ayelet Ronen
    • 1
  • Gal Maydan
    • 1
  • Natalia Kornyukov
    • 1
  • Arie Burstin
    • 1
  • Shai Brill
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Beit Rivka Geriatric Rehabilitation CenterPetach TikvaIsrael
  2. 2.Rabin Medical CenterBeilinson HospitalPetah TikvaIsrael
  3. 3.Sackler School of MedicineTel-Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations