The number of older patients admitted to emergency departments (ED) increases continuously. The Identification of Seniors at Risk (ISAR) score is currently recommended to screen patients in German ED, but its appropriateness is being criticized. ISAR scores and clinical characteristics from 98 emergency admissions (EA), 80 from acute geriatrics (AG) and 89 from a geriatric rehabilitation (GR) unit were compared retrospectively. No significant differences were found between groups, being the ISAR score positive in 87.7% of EA, 94.9% of AG and 94.4% of GR cases. None of positively identified geriatric patients in the EA was transferred to the geriatric ward of competence. EA patients showed significantly higher number of functional impairments (p = 0.001) and higher BI score (p < 0.0001) compared to AG and GR groups. A higher ISAR score threshold and additional functional information might be needed to better select patients in need of prompt treatment by a geriatric team.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Conroy S, Nickel C, Mooijaart SP (2018) Urgent care. In: Roller-Wirnsberger RE, Singler K, Polidori MC (eds) Learning geriatric medicine, Springer, New York
McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S et al. (1998) Screening for geriatric problems in the emergency department: reliability and validity. Identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) Steering Committee. Acad Emerg Med 5:883–893
McCusker J, Bellavance F, Cardin S et al. (1999) Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: the ISAR screening tool. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:1229–1237
Thiem U, Greuel HW, Reingräber A et al. (2012) Consensus for the identification of geriatric patients in the emergency care setting in Germany. Z Gerontol Geriat 45:310–314
Carpenter CR, Shelton E, Fowler S et al. (2015) Risk factors and screening instruments to predict adverse outcomes for undifferentiated older emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 22:1–21
Singler K, Heppner HJ, Skutetzky A et al. (2014) Predictive validity of the identification of seniors at risk screening tool in a German emergency department setting. Gerontology 60:413–419
Hwang U, Carpenter C (2016) Assessing geriatric vulnerability for post emergency department adverse outcomes: challenges abound while progress is slow. EMJ 33:2–3
Yao J-L, Fang J, Lou Q-Q et al. (2015) A systematic review of the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) tool for the prediction of adverse outcome in elderly patients seen in the emergency department. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:4778–4786
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 14:61–65
Di Bari M, Salvi F, Roberts AT et al. (2011) Prognostic stratification of elderly patients in the emergency department: a comparison between the “Identification of Seniors at risk” and the “Silver Code”. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67:544–550
Edmans J, Bradshaw L, Gladman JRF et al. (2013) The identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) score to predict clinical outcomes and health service costs in older people discharged from UK acute medical units. Age Ageing 42:747–753
Galvin R, Gilleit Y, Wallace E et al. (2017) Adverse outcomes in older adults attending emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) screening tool. Age Ageing 46:179–186
This study was presented at the 2018 German Gerontology and Geriatrics Conference.
Conflict of interest
All the above listed authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Cologne as well as by the Ethics Committee of the Clinic Wartenberg.
Statement of human and animal rights
The authors declare agreement with the statement of human and animals rights.
Being based on a retrospective data analysis there was no need for informed consent.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Heppner HJ and Polidori MC are equal supervisors.
About this article
Cite this article
Weinrebe, W., Schiefer, Y., Weckmüller, K. et al. Does the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) score effectively select geriatric patients on emergency admission?. Aging Clin Exp Res 31, 1839–1842 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-018-1105-8
- Emergency admission
- Geriatric patients
- Selection for acute geriatric treatment