Functional capacity improves in-line with neuromuscular performance after 12 weeks of non-linear periodization strength training in the elderly
While it is accepted that resistance training can improve functional capacity in older individuals, the neuromuscular source of this improvement has yet to be identified.
This study investigated the link between improved neuromuscular performance and functional capacity after a 12-week resistance training period in untrained healthy older individuals.
Fifteen older men and women (60–71 years) adhered to a 4-week control period, followed by 12 weeks of non-linear resistance training for the lower limbs. Maximum dynamic leg press strength (1-RM), maximum isometric knee extension torque and rate of torque development (RTD) were evaluated at − 4, 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and muscle activity was assessed at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Functional capacity tests (chair rise, stair ascent and descent, and timed up and go) were performed at − 4, 0, and 12 weeks.
No changes occurred during the control period, but the group increased their 1-RM strength (from 142 ± 53 to 198 ± 43 kg, p = 0.001), which was accompanied by an increase in vastus lateralis activation (p = 0.008) during the intervention. Increase was observed at all RTD time intervals at week 8 (p < 0.05). Significant improvements in all the functional capacity tests were observed at week 12 (p < 0.05).
Despite the expected increase in strength, RTD, muscle activity, and functional capacity, there was no significant relationship between the changes in neuromuscular performance and functional capacity. While resistance training elicits various positive improvements in healthy older individuals, actual strength gain did not influence the gain in functional capacity.
The present study highlights the exact cause that improved the functional capabilities during resistance training are currently unknown.
KeywordsStrength training Rate of torque development Aging Timed up and go Chair rise
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval was obtained from the local Human Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 25995714.0.0000.0121), and the protocol was written in accordance with the standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 15.Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF et al (2000) Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M221–M231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Rhea MR, Phillips WT, Burkett LN et al (2002) A comparison of linear and daily undulating periodized programs with equated volume and intensity for local muscular endurance. J Strength Cond Res 17:82–87Google Scholar
- 21.Siri WE (1961) Body composition from fluid spaces and density: analysis of methods. Nutrition 9:480–492Google Scholar
- 23.Brown LE, Weir JP (2001) ASEP procedures recommendations: Accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. J Exerc Physiol Online 4:1–21Google Scholar
- 27.Cadore EL, Rodríguez-Mañas L, Sinclair A et al (2013) Effects of different exercise interventions on risk of falls, gait ability, and balance in physically frail older adults: a systematic review. Rejuvenation Res 16:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2012.1397 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Jacobson BH, Thompson B, Wallace T et al (2011) Independent static balance training contributes to increased stability and functional capacity in community-dwelling elderly people: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 25:549–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510392390 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Jiménez J, Lluch G, Martínez I et al (2011). Sarcopenia: implications of physical exercise in its pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Andal J Sports Med 4:158–166Google Scholar