Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical impact of recovery room on post-operative walking performance in elderly patients submitted to hip surgery: a real-world analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Strategies aimed at favouring functional recovery after surgery for hip fracture may be of clinical importance.

Aims

To test the clinical utility of a recovery room (RR) in terms of postoperative walking performance in an elderly population submitted to hip fracture surgery.

Methods

Postoperative walking performance at rollator was assessed in 242 consecutive orthogeriatric patients able to follow the institutional physiotherapy protocol starting on day 1 after hip surgery. Group 1 (n = 186, age 86.0 ± 9.3 years, 24.7% male) was admitted to the RR for postoperative monitoring, whereas Group 2 (n = 56, age 85.2 ± 5.7 years, 23.2% male) was directly admitted to the ward. The best performance observed during the first three postoperative days was considered.

Results

Group 1 showed a better walking performance than Group 2, with a 50% lower probability of walking < 5 m (relative risk 0.51, p = 0.0005) and a two-fold higher probability of walking > 10 m (relative risk 2.10, p = 0.0005). Multivariable analysis confirmed a favourable independent effect of the RR stay on walking performance (β = 0.205, p = 0.005).

Discussion

Admission to the RR in elderly patients submitted to hip fracture surgery could have an independent beneficial effect on postoperative walking functional recovery. This beneficial effect could probably depend on the possibility of ensuring a more rapid management of postoperative issues

Conclusions

These findings support the clinical utility of a RR implementation in facilities where hip surgery in elderly subjects is routinely performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Middleton M, Wan B, da Assunçāo R (2017) Improving hip fracture outcomes with integrated orthogeriatric care: a comparison between two accepted orthogeriatric models. Age Ageing 46:465–470

  2. Vermeiren S, Vella-Azzopardi R, Beckwée D et al (2016) Gerontopole brussels study group. Frailty and the prediction of negative health outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc 17:1163.e1–1163.e17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Devereaux PJ, Sessler DI (2015) Cardiac complications in patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 373:2258–2269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandhu A, Sanders S, Geraci SA (2013) Prognostic value of cardiac troponins in elderly patients with hip fracture—a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 24:1145–1149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown CA, Starr AZ, Nunley JA (2012) Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010–2050. J Orthop Trauma 26:117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leal J, Gray AM, Prieto-Alhambra D et al (2016) REFReSH study group. Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 27:549–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rozell JC, Hasenauer M, Donegan DJ et al (2016) Recent advances in the treatment of hip fractures in the elderly. F1000Res 5

  8. Conti D, Ballo P, Buoncristiano U et al (2014) Clinical utility of an undersized nurse-operated recovery room in the postoperative course: results from an Italian community setting. J Perianesth Nurs 29:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Conti D, Ballo P, Boccalini R et al (2014) The effect of patient sex on the incidence of early adverse effects in a population of elderly patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 42:455–459

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mazzola P, Ward L, Zazzetta S et al (2017) Association between preoperative malnutrition and postoperative delirium after hip fracture surgery in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 65:1222–1228

  11. Imbelloni LE, Gomes D, Braga RL et al (2014) Clinical strategies to accelerate recovery after surgery orthopedic femur in elderly patients. Anesth Essays Res 8:156–161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sabharwal S, Wilson H (2015) Orthogeriatrics in the management of frail older patients with a fragility fracture. Osteoporos Int 26:2387–2399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwenk M, Schmidt M, Pfisterer M et al (2011) Rollator use adversely impacts on assessment of gait and mobility during geriatric rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 43:424–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Popov DC, Peniche Ade C (2009) Nurse interventions and the complications in the post-anesthesia recovery room. Rev Esc Enferm USP 43:953–961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Plante A, Ro E, Rowbottom JR (2012) Hemodynamic and related challenges monitoring and regulation in the postoperative period. Anesthesiol Clin 30:527–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Imbelloni LE, Teixeira DM, Coelho TM et al (2014) Implementation of a perioperative management protocol for patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Rev Col Bras Cir 41:161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zerah L, Cohen-Bittan J, Raux M et al (2017) Association between cognitive status before surgery and outcomes in elderly patients with hip fracture in a dedicated orthogeriatric care pathway. J Alzheimers Dis 56:145–156

  18. Aitken H, O’Sullivan E (2007) The international relations committee of the association of anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 62S:72–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mizuno J, Hanaoka K, Merckx P et al (2007) Anesthesiologists in France. Masui 56:345–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Leykin Y, Pellis T, Ambrosio C et al (2007) A recovery room-based acute pain service. Minerva Anestesiol 73:201–206

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gruppo di Studio SIAARTI per la Sicurezza in Anestesia e Terapia Intensiva (2010) Raccomandazioni per l’area di recupero e l’assistenza post-anestesiologica. Rome. http://www.siaarti.it/Ricerca/Raccomandazioni-per-l%E2%80%99area-di-recupero-e-l%E2%80%99assistenza-post-anestesiologica.aspx. Accessed 8 Aug 2017

  22. Oldmeadow LB, Edwards ER, Kimmel LA et al (2006) No rest for the wounded: early ambulation after hip surgery accelerates recovery. ANZ J Surg 76:607–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Siu AL, Penrod JD, Boockvar KS et al (2006) Early ambulation after hip fracture: effects on function and mortality. Arch Intern Med 166:766–771

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pashikanti L, Von Ah D (2012) Impact of early mobilization protocol on the medical–surgical inpatient population: an integrated review of literature. Clin Nurse Spec 26:87–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Duccio Conti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conti, D., Ballo, P., Salucci, L. et al. Clinical impact of recovery room on post-operative walking performance in elderly patients submitted to hip surgery: a real-world analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res 30, 999–1003 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0860-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0860-2

Keywords

Navigation