Skip to main content

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the Barthel Index

Aging Clinical and Experimental Research volume 30, pages 489–497 (2018)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Barthel Index is one of the most employed questionnaires for the evaluation of functionality, but there is no information on its psychometric properties.

Objective

The aim was to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Spanish version of the Barthel Index.

Methods

The data employed in this paper were obtained from four Spanish cohorts of elderly people of 60 years or older. We collected data on age, gender, education level, comorbidities, and questionnaires regarding functionality, health-related quality of life, depression, and social support.

Results

The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were greater than 0.70. The confirmatory factor analysis provided satisfactory fit indexes and factor loadings. The correlation coefficients between the Barthel Index and the other questionnaires were lower than the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Known-groups validity showed significant differences in the Barthel Index according to age, number of comorbidities, and gender. The standardized effect size and the standardized response mean were between 0.68 and 1.81.

Discussion

This version of the Barthel Index has good reliability, its structural validity has been confirmed, and the questionnaire can discriminate between groups and detect changes at follow-up points.

Conclusions

This questionnaire can be used in the evaluation of functionality and basic activities of daily living in elderly people with different conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Cabañero-Martínez MJ, Cabrero-García J, Richart-Martínez M, Muñoz-Mendoza CL (2009) The Spanish versions of the Barthel Index (BI) and the Katz Index (KI) of activities of daily living (ADL): a structured review. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 1:e77–e84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Millán-Calenti JC, Tubío J, Pita-Fernández S, González-Abraldes I, Lorenzo T, Fernández-Arruty T, Maseda A (2010) Prevalence of functional disability in activities of daily living (AdL), instrumental activities of daily living (IAdL) and associated factors, as predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 50:306–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Torres Moreno B, Núñez González E, Pérez Hernández de G, Simón Turriate JP, Alastuey Giménez C, Díaz Melián J, Corujo Rodríguez E, González Bermúdez MD, Fernández Duque O (2009) Barthel and Charlson indexes for the prognosis of mortality and institutionalization in hospitalized geriatric patients. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 44:209–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McDowell I, Newell C (1996). Measuring health. A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965) Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61–65

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sainsbury A, Seebass G, Bansal A, Young JB (2005) Reliability of the Barthel Index when used with older people. Age Ageing 34:228–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baztán JJ, Pérez del Molin J, Alarcón T, San Cristóbal E, Izquierdo G, Manzarbeitia I (1993) Índice de Barthel: instrumento válido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 28:32–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. González N, Aguirre U, Orive M, Zabala J, García-Gutiérrez S, Las Hayas C, Navarro G, Quintana JM (2014) Health-related quality of life and functionality in elderly men and women before and after a fall-related wrist fracture. Int J Clin Pract 68:919–928

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orive M, Aguirre U, García-Gutiérrez S, Las Hayas C, Bilbao A, González N, Zabala J, Navarro G, Quintana JM (2015) Changes in health-related quality of life and activities of daily living after hip fracture because of a fall in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study. Int J Clin Pract 69:491–500

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. León-Salas B, Ayala A, Blaya-Nováková V, Avila-Villanueva M, Rodríguez-Blázquez C, Rojo-Pérez F, Fernández-Mayoralas G, Martínez-Martín P, Forjaz MJ, Spanish Research Group on Quality of Life and Aging (2015) Quality of life across three groups of older adults differing in cognitive status and place of residence. Geriatr Gerontol Int 15:627–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:433–441

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez-Mayoralas G, Giraldez-Garcia C, Forjaz M J, Rojo-Perez F, Martinez-Martin P, Prieto-Flores ME, Spanish Research Group on Quality of Life and Aging (2012) Design, measures and sample characteristics of the CadeViMa-Spain survey on quality of life in community-dwelling older adults. Int Psychogeriatr 24:425–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary test of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 9:179–186

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN (2005) Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:1038–1046

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I (2006) The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7:44

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bilbao A, Quintana JM, Escobar A, Las Hayas C, Orive M (2011) Validation of a proposed WOMAC short form for patients with hip osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcome 9:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 16:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martínez-Martín P, Fernández-Mayoralas G, Frades-Payo B, Rojo-Pérez F, Petidier R, Rodríguez-Rodríguez V, Forjaz MJ, Prieto-Flores ME, de Pedro Cuesta J (2009) Validation of the functional independence scale. Gac Sanit 23:49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 67:361–370

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, de Gruy FV, Kaplan BH (1988) The Duke-UNC functional social support questionnaire: measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care 26:709–723

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of test. Psychometrika 16:297–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mulaik SA (1989) Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull 105:430–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fontana C, Estany J, Pujol J, Segarra I, Jordán Y (2002) Concordancia entre índices de dependencia en las actividades de la vida diaria. Experiencia de aplicación en la población geriátrica de ámbito rural. Enferm Clin 12:47–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Forjaz MJ, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Ayala A, Rodriguez-Rodriguez V, de Pedro-Cuesta J, Garcia-Gutierrez S, Prados-Torres A (2015) Chronic conditions, disability, and quality of life in older adults with multimorbidity in Spain. Eur J Intern Med 26:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD (1999) Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 52:861–873

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health- related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46:1417–1432

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112:155–159

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hsueh IP, Lin JH, Jeng JS, Hsieh CL (2002) Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, five item Barthel Index, and ten item Barthel Index in patients with stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 73:188–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Galeoto G, Lauta A, Palumbo A, Castiglia SF, Mollica R, Santilli V, Sacchetti ML (2015) The Barthel Index: Italian translation, adaptation and validation. Int J Neurol Neurother 2:028

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moura JS, Amendola F, Martins MR, de Campos Oliveira MA (2010) Validation of the Barthel Index in elderly patients attended in outpatient clinics, in Brazil. Acta Paul de Enferm 23:218–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Laake K, Laake P, Ranhoff AH, Sveen U, Wyller TB, Bautz-Holter E (1995) The Barthel ADL Index: factor structure depends on the category of patient. Age Aging 24:393–397

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Bennekom CA, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM (1996) Responsiveness of the rehabilitation activities profile and the Barthel Index. J Clin Epidemiol 49:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, van Kan GA, Ousset PJ, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Ritz P, Duveau F, Soto ME, Provencher V, Nourhashemi F, Salvà A, Robert P, Andrieu S, Rolland Y, Touchon J, Fitten JL, Vellas B, IANA, IAGG (2013) Cognitive frailty: rational and definition from an (IANA/IAGG) international consensus group. J Nutr Health Aging 17:726–734

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Panza F, Seripa D, Solfrizzi V, Tortelli R, Greco A, Pilotto A, Logroscino G (2015) Targeting cognitive frailty: clinical and neurobiological roadmap for a single complex phenotype. J Alzheimer Dis 47:793–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support provided by the Biostatistics Research Group (Biostit), supported by the Department of Education, Linguistics Policy and Culture of the Basque Government (Ref: IT620-13). We gratefully thank the doctors of the Emergency Departments and all of the interviewers from the participating hospitals (Araba University Hospital (Santiago Hospital + Txagorritxu Hospital), Basurto University Hospital, and Cruces University Hospital), for their invaluable collaboration in patient recruitment. We are also grateful to the participants who voluntarily participated in this study and to the Research Committee of the Galdakao-Usansolo Hospital.

OFF (Older Falls Fracture)-IRYSS group: Jose María Quintana Lópeza,k,l, Susana García Gutiérreza,k,l, Carlota Las Hayas Rodríguezb,k,l, Jon Zabala Echenagusiac, Miren Orive Calzadaa,k,l, Nerea González Hernándeza,k,l, Urko Aguirre Larracoecheaa,k,l, Ane Anton Ladislaoa,k,l, Iratxe Lafuente Guerrero a,k,l, Amaia Bilbao Gonzálezd,k,l, Luis Angel Sanado Lampreavee, Ignacio Javier Gamilla Iglesiase, Elena Urrutia Sanzberroe, Rocío Fernández Albae, Ana Iribas Garnicae, Elena Urrutia Sanze, Juan Carlos Arenaza Merinof, Lander Larrea Azkorrag, Celestino Gómez Calatravah, Francisco Rivasi, Gemma Navarro Rubioj.

aUnidad de investigación. Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo. Galdakao (Bizkaia); bDepartamento de Personalidad, evaluación y tratamiento. Universidad de Deusto. Bilbao (Bizkaia); cServicio de traumatología. Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo. Galdakao (Bizkaia), Universidad del País Vasco (UPV). Leioa (Bizkaia); dUnidad de investigación. Hospital Universitario Basurto. Basurto (Bizkaia); eServicio de traumatología. Hospital Universitario Araba. Vitoria-Gasteiz (Araba); fServicio de traumatología. Hospital Universitario Basurto (Bizkaia); gServicio de traumatología. Hospital Universitario Cruces. Barakaldo (Bizkaia); hServicio de traumatología. Hospital Universitario Donostia. San Sebastián-Donostia (Gipuzkoa); iUnidad de epidemiología. Hospital Costa del Sol. Marbella (Málaga); jUnidad de epidemiología. Corporació Parc Tauli Clinic. Sabadell (Barcelona); kRed de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas-REDISSEC; lCentro de investigación en Cronicidad (Kronikgune). Bilbao (Bizkaia).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Research Unit, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Bº Labeaga, 46A, 48960, Galdakao, Bizkaia, Spain

    Nerea González, Miren Orive, Susana Garcia-Gutierrez & Jose Maria Quintana

  2. Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain

    Amaia Bilbao

  3. National School of Public Health, Institute of Health Carlos III, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain

    Maria Joao Forjaz & Alba Ayala

  4. Basque Foundation for Health Innovation and Research (BIOEF), Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain

    Carlota Las Hayas

Authors
  1. Nerea González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amaia Bilbao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Joao Forjaz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alba Ayala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miren Orive
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Susana Garcia-Gutierrez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Carlota Las Hayas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jose Maria Quintana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

OFF (Older Falls Fracture)-IRYSS group

Contributions

All of the authors contributed to the critical revision of the paper and approved the final version. Nerea González drafted the manuscript and incorporated the revisions of coauthors. Amaia Bilbao conducted the statistical analysis. Miren Orive and Carlota Las Hayas enrolled the participants. Susana García-Gutiérrez, Jose M. Quintana, Joao Forjaz, and Alba Ayala contributed to the design of the study and helped interpret the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nerea González.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by a grants from the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI08/90417); Department of Health of the Basque Country (2008111016); Asociación para la promoción de la Investigación clínica del Hospital de Galdakao-GOSIKER (BIOEF11/033); KRONIKGUNE- Centro de Investigación en Cronicidad (KRONIK 11/005); and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Disclosure of potential conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

This study was approved by the Ethics Committees and/or Review Boards of the participating institutions and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

González, N., Bilbao, A., Forjaz, M.J. et al. Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the Barthel Index. Aging Clin Exp Res 30, 489–497 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0809-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-017-0809-5

Keywords

  • Barthel Index
  • Functionality
  • Validity
  • Reliability
  • Responsiveness