Skip to main content
Log in

SPRINTT and the involvement of stakeholders: strategy and structure

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current healthcare systems are built around the traditional paradigm of patients suffering from a single acute illness. They are, therefore, largely unprepared to face the increasing demands for health services arising from the expansion of an older population with specific medical needs related to multiple chronic disorders. As a consequence, the medical conditions of a large and growing segment of the older European population are not efficiently managed by the available healthcare services. In the context of an aging population, policy makers such as the European Commission and European Institutions, such as the European Medicines Agency (EMA), devote time and resources to study and accompany the need of the aging population. The EMA recognizes the importance of making sure that the needs of the Elderly are considered during development, approval, and use of new medicines, and, therefore, engages with healthcare professional organisations. The Sarcopenia and Physical Frailty in Older People: Multicomponent Intervention Strategies (SPRINTT) is the obvious result of these strategies. The present article describes the SPRINTT workpackage activities aimed at engaging the scientific discussion on the physical frailty and sarcopenia with the EMA as one of its interlocutor, acknowledging the need to collaborate on this topic to foster a productive dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eurostat newsrelease. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7012459/3-29092015-AP-EN.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2016

  2. EMA (2011) EMA geriatric medicines strategy. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2011/02/WC500102291.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2016

  3. EMA (2013) Proposal for the development of a points to consider for baseline characterisation of frailty status. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Other/2013/06/WC500144373.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2016

  4. EMA (2015) Points to consider on frailty: Evaluation instruments for baseline characterisation of clinical trial populations. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2015/12/WC500199243.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2016

  5. Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, Patel K, Wong JB, Leslie LK, Lau J (2014) A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med 12:1692–1701. doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Boer P, Cesario A, Ignaszewski C (2015) Dialogue Platform Model. EU-Open. http://www.eu-open.it/the-dialogue-platform-model/?lang=en. Accessed 29 June 2016

  7. Teunissen GJ, Visse MA, de Boer WI, Abma TA (2013) Structuring patient advocates’ appraisal and evaluation of health research and quality of care. J Participat Med 5:e16

    Google Scholar 

  8. MySPRINTT webpage Dialogue Platform. http://www.mysprintt.eu/dialogue-platform. Accessed 29 June 2016

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the members of the Dialogue Platform [8] for their contribution as volunteer advisors to the project and its activities. The present work was funded by a grant from the Innovative Medicines Initiative-Joint Undertaking (IMI-JU 115621).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Régis Le Lain.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Le Lain, R., Ignaszewski, C., Klingmann, I. et al. SPRINTT and the involvement of stakeholders: strategy and structure. Aging Clin Exp Res 29, 65–67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0706-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0706-3

Keywords

Navigation