Qualitative patterns at Raven’s colored progressive matrices in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

Abstract

Background

Visuo-spatial and problem-solving abilities are commonly impaired in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Conversely, subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) do not exhibit overt involvement of cognitive domains other than memory. Consequently, a detection of an impairment at the Raven’s colored progressive matrices (RCPM) could be useful to discriminate aMCI from AD and to mark the progression from one condition to another.

Aim of the study

To describe the pattern of errors at RCPM in subjects suffering from AD as compared with that of aMCI.

Methods

Fifteen patients with AD, 15 subjects with aMCI and 31 Healthy Controls (HC) received the RCPM. The errors were classified as: (1) difference (D); (2) inadequate individuation (II); (3) repetition of the pattern (RP); (4) incomplete correlation (IC).

Results

No difference approached significance between aMCI subjects and HC. AD patients always exhibited a higher number of errors as compared with HC. AD patients showed higher number of errors as compared with aMCI only on RP and IC errors.

Conclusions

The results suggest that the visuo-spatial and problem-solving impairment that characterize AD, and probably subtend the progression from aMCI to dementia, do not affect to the same extent all cognitive dimensions explored by RCPM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. 1.

    Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC et al (1999) Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 56:303–308

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Raven JC (1938) Standard progressive matrices: sets A, B, C, D and E. H.K. Lewis, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e Taratura Italiana di Test Neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 8:62–65

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Carlesimo GA, Caltagirone C, Gainotti G, the Group for the Standardization of the Mental Deterioration Battery (1996) The mental deterioration battery: normative data, diagnostic reliability and qualitative analyses of sognitive impairment. Eur Neurol 36:378–384

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Gainotti G, Marra C, Villa G et al (1998) Sensitivity and specificity of some neuropsychological markers of Alzheimer dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 12:152–162

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Belacchi C, Scalisi TG, Cannoni C (2011) CPM—coloured progressive matrices. Standardizzazione Italiana. Prato: Giunti OS Organizzazioni Speciali

  7. 7.

    McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M et al (1984) Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology 34:939–944

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Musicco M, Caltagirone C, Sorbi S et al (2004) Italian Neurological Society guidelines for the diagnosis of dementia: revision I. Neurol Sci 25:154–182

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHigh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 12:189–198

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Measso G, Zappala G, Cavarzeran F et al (1993) Raven’s colored progressive matrices: a normative study of a random sample of healthy adults. Acta Neurol Scand 88:70–74

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I et al (2000) The FAB: frontal Assessment Battery at bed-side. Neurology 55:1621–1626

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Iavarone A, Ronga B, Pellegrino L et al (2004) The frontal assessment battery (FAB): normative data from an Italian sample and performances of patients with Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Funct Neurol 19:191–195

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Raven J, Raven JC, Court JH (1998) Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford Psychologists Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    van Herwegen J, Farran E, Annaz D (2011) Item and error analysis on Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices in Williams Syndrome. Res Dev Disabil 32:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Dr. Camillo Marra for his helpful information about psychometric properties of the MDB.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferdinando Ivano Ambra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

None of the authors received any funding for this work.

Ethical approval

All procedure performed in studies involving human participant were in accordance with 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendment or comparable ethical standard.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ambra, F.I., Iavarone, A., Ronga, B. et al. Qualitative patterns at Raven’s colored progressive matrices in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Clin Exp Res 28, 561–565 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0438-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Cognitive assessment
  • Dementia
  • Mild cognitive impairment
  • Neuropsychology
  • Raven’s progressive matrices