Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Post-surgical rehabilitative approach to fragility fractures

  • Review
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength predisposing to an increased risk of fracture. The most frequent sites of fragility fractures are the hip, the distal radius, the spine, the proximal humerus, and the ankle. In most cases, a surgical approach with subsequent rehabilitative treatment is required. The general aims of rehabilitation are to increase functioning and improve patients’ activities, participation level, and quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. (2001) NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis. JAMA 285:785–795

  2. Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Reginster JY, Borgstrom F, Rizzoli R, European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cieza A, Schwarzkopf S, Sigl T, Stucki G, Melvin J, Stoll T, Woolf A, Kostanjsek N, Walsh N (2004) ICF core sets for osteoporosis. J Rehabil Med (44 Suppl):81–86

  4. Tarantino U, Capone A, Planta M, D’Arienzo M, Letizia Mauro G, Impagliazzo A, Formica A, Pallotta F, Patella V, Spinarelli A, Pazzaglia U, Zarattini G, Roselli M, Montanari G, Sessa G, Privitera M, Verdoia C, Corradini C, Feola M, Padolino A, Saturnino L, Scialdoni A, Rao C, Iolascon G, Brandi ML, Piscitelli P (2010) The incidence of hip, forearm, humeral, ankle, and vertebral fragility fractures in Italy: results from a 3-year multicenter study. Arthr Res Ther 12(6):R226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Parker MJ, Handoll HHG (2006) Replacement arthroplasty versus internal fixation for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 Art. No.: CD000086. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000086.pub2

  6. Pietri M, Lucarini S (2007) The orthopaedic treatment of fragility fractures. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 4(2):108–116

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Meyer HE, Tverdal A, Falch JA, Pedersen JI (2000) Factors associated with mortality after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 11(3):228–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hagsten B, Svensson O, Gardulf A (2006) Health-related quality of life and self-reported ability concerning ADL and IADL after hip fracture: a randomized trial. Acta Orthop 77(1):114–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Di Monaco R, Tappero R, Cavanna A (2006) Muscle mass and functional recovery in women with hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85(3):209–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zimmerman S, Hawkes WG, Hebel JR, Fox KM, Lydick E, Magaziner J (2006) The lower extremity gain scale: a performance-based measure to assess recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(3):430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Latham NK, Jette DU, Warren RL, Wirtalla C (2006) Pattern of functional change during rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(1):111–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Patterson BM, Cornell CN, Carbone B, Levine B, Chapman D (1992) Protein depletion and metabolic stress in elderly patients who have a fracture of the hip. J Bone Jt Surg Am 74(2):251–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Iolascon G, Cervone M, Gimigliano R, Di Pietro G, Gimigliano F (2011) Neuropsychiatric disorders in hip fracture. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 8(3):49–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Munin MC, Rudy TE, Glynn NW, Crossett LS, Rubash HE (1998) Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. JAMA 279(11):847–852

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chilov M, Cameron ID, March LM (2003) Evidence-based guidelines for fixing broken hips: an update. Med J Aust 179:489–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2002) Prevention and management of hip fracture in older people. A national clinical guideline. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Edinburgh. Guideline 71. http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/71/index.html. Accessed 31 May 2013

  17. Bonner FJ Jr, Sinaki M, Grabois M, Shipp KM, Lane JM, Lindsay R, Gold DT, Cosman F, Bouxsein ML, Weinstein JN, Gallagher RM, Melton LJ III, Salcido RS, Gordon SL (2003) Health professional’s guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14(Suppl 2):S1-22

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scioscia TN, Ziran BH (2003) Use of a vertical transarticular pin for stabilization of severe ankle fractures. Am J Orthop 32:46–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Gimigliano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gimigliano, F., Iolascon, G., Riccio, I. et al. Post-surgical rehabilitative approach to fragility fractures. Aging Clin Exp Res 25 (Suppl 1), 23–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0094-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0094-x

Keywords

Navigation