Abstract
Reconstruction of bone defects is a challenge for all orthopedic surgeons worldwide; to overcome this problem there are different options: the use of autografts, allografts and bone substitutes (BSs) to enhance and accelerate bone repair. Autografts have excellent biological properties but are associated with morbidity of the donor site and are restricted in volume. Allografts are available in adequate quantity but concerns still remain about the risk of infections, moreover they do not have osteogenetic properties. Bone substitutes have different indications and are very attractive for orthopedic surgeons. The present paper briefly reviews the advantages and disadvantages of autografts, allografts and BSs for bone reconstruction.
References
Miron RJ, Zhang YF (2012) Osteoinduction: a review of old concepts with new standards. J Dent Res 91(8):736–744. doi:10.1177/0022034511435260
Bhatt RA, Rozental TD (2012) Bone graft substitutes. Hand Clin 28(4):457–468. doi:10.1016/j.hcl.2012.08.001
Pape HC, Evans A, Kobbe P (2010) Autologous bone graft: properties and techniques. J Orthop Trauma 24(suppl 1):S36–S40. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cec4a1
Fernandez-Bances I, Perez-Basterrechea M, Perez-Lopez S, Nunez batalla D, Fernandez Rodriguez MA, Alvarez-Viejo M, Ferrero-Gutierrez A, Menendez–Menendez Y, Garcia-Gala JM, Escudero D, Paz Aparicio J, Carnero Lopez S, Lopez Fernandez P, Gonzales Suarez D, Otero Hernandez J (2013) Repair of long-bone pseudoarthrosis with autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell combined with allogenic bone graft. Cytotherapy 15(5):571–577. doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2013.01.004
Khan SN, Cammisa FP Jr, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM (2005) The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(1):77–86
Palmer W, Crawford-Sykes A, Rose RE (2008) Donor site morbidity following iliac crest bone graft. West Indian Med J 57(5):490–492
Goff T, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV (2013) Use of bone graft substitutes in the management of tibial plateau fractures. Injury 44(suppl 1):S86–S94. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(13)70019-6
Zimmermann G, Moghaddam A (2011) Allograft bone matrix versus synthetic bone graft substitutes. Injury 42(suppl 2):S16–S21. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.199
Zwingenberger S, Nich C, Valladares RD, Yao Z, Stiehler M, Goodman SB (2012) Recommendations and considerations for the use of biologics in orthopedic surgery. BioDrugs 26(4):245–256. doi:10.2165/11631680-000000000-00000
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chiarello, E., Cadossi, M., Tedesco, G. et al. Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res 25 (Suppl 1), 101–103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0088-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0088-8