Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 14 January 2016

Abstract

Proximal humeral fractures are common in the setting of osteoporosis and they represent a problem not only for increased mortality risk factors, but also in terms of costs and management. Their increased incidence has resulted in an evolution of treatment options, but currently there is no scientific evidence that defines the best treatment to choose. The choice of treatment depends on a variety of factors, such as fracture dislocation, fracture classification, bone quality, patient’s age, functional requirements and general medical conditions. The debate about the treatment is still open, both for the decision between surgical and conservative treatment, and between different types of surgical techniques; nowadays it remains unclear whether surgery will produce better outcomes in function and quality of life in elderly osteoporotic patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bahrs C, Bauer M, Blumenstock G, Eingartner C, Bahrs SD, Tepass A, Weise K, Rolauffs B (2013) The complexity of proximal humeral fractures is age and gender specific. J Orthop Sci

  2. Launonen AP, Lepola V, Flinkkilä T, Strandberg N, Ojanperä J, Rissanen P, Malmivaara A, Mattila VM, Elo P, Viljakka T, Laitinen M (2012) Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7(13):167. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fjalestad T, Hole MØ, Hovden IA, Blücher J, Strømsøe K (2012) Surgical treatment with an angular stable plate for complex displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Trauma 26(2):98–106. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821c2e15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Okike K, Lee OC, Makanji H, Harris MB, Vrahas MS (2012) Factors associated with the decision for operative versus non-operative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly. Injury 44(4):448–455. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2012.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brunner A, Weller K, Thormann S, Jöckel JA, Babst R (2010) Closed reduction and minimally invasive percutaneous fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the Humerusblock. J Orthop Trauma 24(7):407–413. doi:10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181c81b1c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Benetos IS, Karampinas PK, Mavrogenis AF, Romoudis P, Pneumaticos SG, Vlamis J (2012) External fixation for displaced 2-part proximal humeral fractures. Orthopedics 35(12):e1732–e1737. doi:10.3928/01477447-20121120-17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar V, Datir S, Venkateswaran B (2010) Intramedullary nailing for displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 18(3):324–327

    Google Scholar 

  8. Verbeek PA, van den Akker-Scheek I, Wendt KW, Diercks RL (2012) Hemiarthroplasty versus angle stable locking compression plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: design of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 13:16. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-16

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garrigues GE, Johnston PS, Pepe MD, Tucker BS, Ramsey ML, Austin LS (2012) Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Orthopedics 35(5):e703–e708. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120426-25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyle MJ, Youn SM, Frampton CM, Ball CM (2013) Functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared with hemiarthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(1):32–37. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.03.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(7):1025–1033. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Olerud P, Ahrengart L, Ponzer S, Saving J, Tidermark J (2011) Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(5):747–755. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fjalestad T, Hole MØ, Jørgensen JJ, Strømsøe K, Kristiansen IS (2010) Health and cost consequences of surgical versus conservative treatment for a comminuted proximal humeral fracture in elderly patients. Injury 41(6):599–605. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.10.056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Handoll HH, Ollivere BJ, Rollins KE (2012) Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD000434. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub3

  15. Bastian JD, Hertel R (2009) Osteosynthesis and hemiarthroplasty of fractures of the proximal humerus: outcomes in a consecutive case series. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(2):216–219. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2008.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Mazzotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cadossi, M., Mazzotti, A., Capra, C. et al. Proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res 25 (Suppl 1), 85–87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0078-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-013-0078-x

Keywords

Navigation